Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kehan Lyu
dblp:223/7700
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Vision and language · 50% Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Memory systems · 77% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 12% Storage systems · 12% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Meta CLIP 2: A Worldwide Scaling Recipe · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language pretraining |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Meta CLIP 2: A Worldwide Scaling Recipe · NeurIPS 2025 |
Memory systems
DRAM |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Nonblocking Memory Refresh · ISCA 2018 |
Memory systems › DRAM
DRAM refresh |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Nonblocking Memory Refresh · ISCA 2018 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
error correction |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Nonblocking Memory Refresh · ISCA 2018 |
Storage systems › data representation › data encoding › error correction coding
reed-solomon codes |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Nonblocking Memory Refresh · ISCA 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
contrastive pre-training · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Meta CLIP 2: A Worldwide Scaling RecipeabstractContrastive Language-Image Pretraining (CLIP) is a popular foundation model, supporting from zero-shot classification, retrieval to encoders for multimodal large language models (MLLMs). Although CLIP is successfully trained on billion-scale image-text pairs from the English world, scaling CLIP's training further to learning from the worldwide web data is still challenging: (1) no curation method is available to handle data points from non-English world; (2) the English performance from existing multilingual CLIP is worse than its English-only counterpart, i.e., "curse of multilinguality" that is common in LLMs. Here, we present Meta CLIP 2, the first recipe training CLIP from scratch on worldwide web-scale image-text pairs. To generalize our findings, we conduct rigorous ablations with minimal changes that are necessary to address the above challenges and present a recipe enabling mutual benefits from English and non-English world data.
In zero-shot ImageNet classification, Meta CLIP 2 ViT-H/14 surpasses its English-only counterpart by 0.8% and mSigLIP by 0.7%, and surprisingly sets new state-of-the-art without system-level confounding factors (e.g., translation, bespoke architecture changes) on multilingual benchmarks, such as CVQA with 57.4%, Babel-ImageNet with 50.2% and XM3600 with 64.3% on image-to-text retrieval. Code and model are available at https://github.com/facebookresearch/MetaCLIP. Yung-Sung Chuang, Ching-Feng Yeh, Kehan Lyu, Ramya Raghavendra, James R. Glass, Lifei Huang, Jason Weston, Luke Zettlemoyer, Xinlei Chen, Zhuang Liu 0003, Saining Xie, Scott Yih, Shang-Wen Li 0001, Hu Xu 0001 |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2018 | Nonblocking Memory RefreshabstractSince its inception half a century ago, DRAM has required dynamic/active refresh operations that block read requests and decrease performance. We propose refreshing DRAM in the background without stalling read accesses to refreshing memory blocks, similar to the static/background refresh in SRAM. Our proposed Nonblocking Refresh works by refreshing a portion of the data in a memory block at a time and uses redundant data, such as Reed-Solomon codes, in the block to compute the block's refreshing/unreadable data to satisfy read requests. For proof of concept, we apply Nonblocking Refresh to server memory systems, where every memory block already contains redundant data to provide hardware failure protection. In this context, Nonblocking Refresh can utilize server memory system's existing per-block redundant data in the common-case when there are no hardware faults to correct, without requiring any dedicated redundant data of its own. Our evaluations show that on average across five server memory systems with different redundancy and failure protection strengths, Nonblocking Refresh improves performance by 16.2% and 30.3% for 16gb and 32gb DRAM chips, respectively. Kate Nguyen, Kehan Lyu, Xianze Meng, Vilas Sridharan, Xun Jian 0002 |
ISCA | 2 |