Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michal Augoff

dblp:223/8001 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › mass spectrometry data analysis
automated peak picking
0.312018
NMRNet: a deep learning approach to automated peak picking of protein NMR spectra · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural biology
NMR spectroscopy
0.312018
NMRNet: a deep learning approach to automated peak picking of protein NMR spectra · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology
structural bioinformatics
0.312018
NMRNet: a deep learning approach to automated peak picking of protein NMR spectra · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
protein structure determination
0.112018
NMRNet: a deep learning approach to automated peak picking of protein NMR spectra · Bioinform. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deep learning · 0.3convolutional neural network · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 NMRNet: a deep learning approach to automated peak picking of protein NMR spectra
abstract
Motivation: Automated selection of signals in protein NMR spectra, known as peak picking, has been studied for over 20 years, nevertheless existing peak picking methods are still largely deficient. Accurate and precise automated peak picking would accelerate the structure calculation, and analysis of dynamics and interactions of macromolecules. Recent advancement in handling big data, together with an outburst of machine learning techniques, offer an opportunity to tackle the peak picking problem substantially faster than manual picking and on par with human accuracy. In particular, deep learning has proven to systematically achieve human-level performance in various recognition tasks, and thus emerges as an ideal tool to address automated identification of NMR signals. Results: We have applied a convolutional neural network for visual analysis of multidimensional NMR spectra. A comprehensive test on 31 manually annotated spectra has demonstrated top-tier average precision (AP) of 0.9596, 0.9058 and 0.8271 for backbone, side-chain and NOESY spectra, respectively. Furthermore, a combination of extracted peak lists with automated assignment routine, FLYA, outperformed other methods, including the manual one, and led to correct resonance assignment at the levels of 90.40%, 89.90% and 90.20% for three benchmark proteins. Availability and implementation: The proposed model is a part of a Dumpling software (platform for protein NMR data analysis), and is available at https://dumpling.bio/. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Piotr Klukowski, Michal Augoff, Maciej Zieba, Maciej Drwal, Adam Gonczarek, Michal J. Walczak
Bioinform.2