Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michal Augoff
dblp:223/8001
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › mass spectrometry data analysis
automated peak picking |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | NMRNet: a deep learning approach to automated peak picking of protein NMR spectra · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural biology
NMR spectroscopy |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | NMRNet: a deep learning approach to automated peak picking of protein NMR spectra · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
structural bioinformatics |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | NMRNet: a deep learning approach to automated peak picking of protein NMR spectra · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
protein structure determination |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | NMRNet: a deep learning approach to automated peak picking of protein NMR spectra · Bioinform. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep learning · 0.3convolutional neural network · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | NMRNet: a deep learning approach to automated peak picking of protein NMR spectraabstractMotivation: Automated selection of signals in protein NMR spectra, known as peak picking, has been studied for over 20 years, nevertheless existing peak picking methods are still largely deficient. Accurate and precise automated peak picking would accelerate the structure calculation, and analysis of dynamics and interactions of macromolecules. Recent advancement in handling big data, together with an outburst of machine learning techniques, offer an opportunity to tackle the peak picking problem substantially faster than manual picking and on par with human accuracy. In particular, deep learning has proven to systematically achieve human-level performance in various recognition tasks, and thus emerges as an ideal tool to address automated identification of NMR signals. Results: We have applied a convolutional neural network for visual analysis of multidimensional NMR spectra. A comprehensive test on 31 manually annotated spectra has demonstrated top-tier average precision (AP) of 0.9596, 0.9058 and 0.8271 for backbone, side-chain and NOESY spectra, respectively. Furthermore, a combination of extracted peak lists with automated assignment routine, FLYA, outperformed other methods, including the manual one, and led to correct resonance assignment at the levels of 90.40%, 89.90% and 90.20% for three benchmark proteins. Availability and implementation: The proposed model is a part of a Dumpling software (platform for protein NMR data analysis), and is available at https://dumpling.bio/. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Piotr Klukowski, Michal Augoff, Maciej Zieba, Maciej Drwal, Adam Gonczarek, Michal J. Walczak |
Bioinform. | 2 |