Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shobhit Verma
dblp:224/0704
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Reconstructing scenes with mirror and glass surfaces · ACM Trans. Graph. 2018 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction › surface reconstruction
planar surface reconstruction |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Reconstructing scenes with mirror and glass surfaces · ACM Trans. Graph. 2018 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction › non-lambertian surface reconstruction
reflective surface reconstruction |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Reconstructing scenes with mirror and glass surfaces · ACM Trans. Graph. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
plane segmentation · 0.3apriltag fiducial · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Reconstructing scenes with mirror and glass surfacesabstractPlanar reflective surfaces such as glass and mirrors are notoriously hard to reconstruct for most current 3D scanning techniques. When treated naïvely, they introduce duplicate scene structures, effectively destroying the reconstruction altogether. Our key insight is that an easy to identify structure attached to the scanner---in our case an AprilTag---can yield reliable information about the existence and the geometry of glass and mirror surfaces in a scene. We introduce a fully automatic pipeline that allows us to reconstruct the geometry and extent of planar glass and mirror surfaces while being able to distinguish between the two. Furthermore, our system can automatically segment observations of multiple reflective surfaces in a scene based on their estimated planes and locations. In the proposed setup, minimal additional hardware is needed to create high-quality results. We demonstrate this using reconstructions of several scenes with a variety of real mirrors and glass. Thomas Whelan, Michael Goesele, Steven Lovegrove, Julian Straub, Simon Green, Richard Szeliski, Steven Butterfield, Shobhit Verma, Richard A. Newcombe |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 8 |