Abstract DLV2 is an AI tool for knowledge representation and reasoning that supports answer set programming (ASP) – a logic-based declarative formalism, successfully used in both academic and industrial applications. Given a logic program modeling a computational problem, an execution of DLV2 produces the so-called answer sets that correspond one-to-one to the solutions to the problem at hand. The computational process of DLV2 relies on the typical ground & solve approach, where the grounding step transforms the input program into a new, equivalent ground program, and the subsequent solving step applies propositional algorithms to search for the answer sets. Recently, emerging applications in contexts such as stream reasoning and event processing created a demand for multi-shot reasoning: here, the system is expected to be reactive while repeatedly executed over rapidly changing data. In this work, we present a new incremental reasoner obtained from the evolution of DLV2 toward iterated reasoning. Rather than restarting the computation from scratch, the system remains alive across repeated shots, and it incrementally handles the internal grounding process. At each shot, the system reuses previous computations for building and maintaining a large, more general ground program, from which a smaller yet equivalent portion is determined and used for computing answer sets. Notably, the incremental process is performed in a completely transparent fashion for the user. We describe the system, its usage, its applicability, and performance in some practically relevant domains.

Automating acts on touch surfaces opens a range of possibilities for researching and experimenting with hybrid AI approaches. In this paper, we propose a delta robot capable of playing match-3 games and ball-sorting puzzles by acting on mobile phones. The robot recognizes objects of different colors and shapes through a vision module, is capable of making strategic decisions based on declarative models of the game's rules and of the game playing strategy, and features an effector that executes moves on physical devices. Our solution integrates multiple AI methods, including vision processing and answer set programming. Helpful and reusable infrastructure is provided: the vision task is facilitated, while robot motion control is inherently simplified by the usage of a delta robot layout. We illustrate the components of our robotic application and how they were integrated. Then, we briefly showcase how recognition and general knowledge can be modeled and implemented, by overviewing the implementation of representative games. We argue that our application provides potential for KR and robotics to be combined in creative ways, and offers itself as a general controlled environment where to experiment with forms of hybrid reasoning, while relieving from implementation details.

Abstract Automated compliance checking, i.e. the task of automatically assessing whether states of affairs comply with normative systems, has recently received a lot of attention from the scientific community, also as a consequence of the increasing investments in Artificial Intelligence technologies for the legal domain (LegalTech). The authors of this paper deem as crucial the research and implementation of compliance checkers that can directly process data in RDF format, as nowadays more and more (big) data in this format are becoming available worldwide, across a multitude of different domains. Among the automated technologies that have been used in recent literature, to the best of our knowledge, only two of them have been evaluated with input states of affairs encoded in RDF format. This paper formalizes a selected use case in these two technologies and compares the implementations, also in terms of simulations with respect to shared synthetic datasets.

Declarative methods such as Answer Set Programming show potential in cutting down development costs in commercial videogames and real-time applications in general. Many shortcomings, however, prevent their adoption, such as performance and integration gaps. In this work we illustrate our ThinkEngine, a framework in which a tight integration of declarative formalisms within the typical game development workflow is made possible in the context of the Unity game engine. ThinkEngine allows to wire declarative AI modules to the game logic and to move the computational load of reasoning tasks outside the main game loop using an hybrid deliberative/reactive architecture. In this paper, we illustrate the architecture of the ThinkEngine and its role both at design and run-time. Then we show how to program declarative modules in a proof-of-concept game, and report about performance and related work.

DLV2 is an AI tool for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning which supports Answer Set Programming (ASP) – a logic-based declarative formalism, successfully used in both academic and industrial applications. Given a logic program modelling a computational problem, an execution of DLV2 produces the so-called answer sets that correspond one-to-one to the solutions. The computational process relies on the typical Ground&Solve approach where the grounding step transforms the input program into a new, equivalent ground program, and the subsequent solving step applies propositional algorithms to search for the answer sets. Recently, emerging applications in contexts such as stream reasoning and event processing demand for multi-shot reasoning: here, the system is expected to be reactive while repeatedly executed over rapidly changing data. In this work, we present a new incremental reasoner obtained from the evolution of DLV2 towards multi-shot reasoning. Rather than restarting the computation from scratch, the system remains alive and incrementally handles the internal grounding process: in a completely transparent fashion for the user, at each shot, it reuses previous computations for building and maintaining a large, more general ground program, from which a smaller yet equivalent portion is determined and used for computing answer sets. We describe the system, its usage, its applicability and performance in some practically relevant domains.

Abstract The repeated execution of reasoning tasks is desirable in many applicative scenarios, such as stream reasoning and event processing. When using answer set programming in such contexts, one can avoid the iterative generation of ground programs thus achieving a significant payoff in terms of computing time. However, this may require some additional amount of memory and/or the manual addition of operational directives in the declarative knowledge base at hand. We introduce a new strategy for generating series of monotonically growing propositional programs. The proposedovergrounded programs with tailoring(OPTs) can be updated and reused in combination with consecutive inputs. With respect to earlier approaches, ourtailored simplificationtechnique reduces the size of instantiated programs. A maintained OPT slowly grows in size from an iteration to another while the update cost decreases, especially in later iterations. In this paper we formally introduce tailored embeddings, a family of equivalence-preserving ground programs which are at the theoretical basis of OPTs and we describe their properties. We then illustrate an OPT update algorithm and report about our implementation and its performance.

Abstract Repeated executions of reasoning tasks for varying inputs are necessary in many applicative settings, such as stream reasoning. In this context, we propose an incremental grounding approach for the answer set semantics. We focus on the possibility of generating incrementally larger ground logic programs equivalent to a given non-ground one; so calledovergrounded programscan be reused in combination with deliberately many different sets of inputs. Updating overgrounded programs requires a small effort, thus making the instantiation of logic programs considerably faster when grounding is repeated on a series of inputs similar to each other. Notably, the proposed approach works “under the hood”, relieving designers of logic programs from controlling technical aspects of grounding engines and answer set systems. In this work we present the theoretical basis of the proposed incremental grounding technique, we illustrate the consequent repeated evaluation strategy and report about our experiments.