Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lie He
dblp:225/5245
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 50% Learning theory · 24% Reinforcement learning · 16% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 81% Computational complexity · 19% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 23 heaviest of 23, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
1.0 | 2 | 2021 | RelaySum for Decentralized Deep Learning on Heterogeneous Data · NeurIPS 2021 Learning from History for Byzantine Robust Optimization · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics
high-dimensional estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Leveraging Sparsity for Sample-Efficient Preference Learning: A Theoretical Perspective · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
preference learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Leveraging Sparsity for Sample-Efficient Preference Learning: A Theoretical Perspective · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
reward modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Leveraging Sparsity for Sample-Efficient Preference Learning: A Theoretical Perspective · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Leveraging Sparsity for Sample-Efficient Preference Learning: A Theoretical Perspective · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics
sparse estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Leveraging Sparsity for Sample-Efficient Preference Learning: A Theoretical Perspective · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
decentralized learning |
0.8 | 2 | 2021 | RelaySum for Decentralized Deep Learning on Heterogeneous Data · NeurIPS 2021 COLA: Decentralized Linear Learning · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
collaborative learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CoBo: Collaborative Learning via Bilevel Optimization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated and distributed training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CoBo: Collaborative Learning via Bilevel Optimization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
bilevel optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CoBo: Collaborative Learning via Bilevel Optimization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
0.7 | 2 | 2022 | Learning from History for Byzantine Robust Optimization · ICML 2021 Byzantine-Robust Learning on Heterogeneous Datasets via Bucketing · ICLR 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
conditional stochastic optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Debiasing Conditional Stochastic Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
convergence analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Debiasing Conditional Stochastic Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Debiasing Conditional Stochastic Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Debiasing Conditional Stochastic Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Byzantine-Robust Learning on Heterogeneous Datasets via Bucketing · ICLR 2022 |
Distributed systems
distributed machine learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Byzantine-Robust Learning on Heterogeneous Datasets via Bucketing · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
communication-efficient training |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | RelaySum for Decentralized Deep Learning on Heterogeneous Data · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
data heterogeneity |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | RelaySum for Decentralized Deep Learning on Heterogeneous Data · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › model aggregation
robust aggregation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning from History for Byzantine Robust Optimization · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
distributed optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | COLA: Decentralized Linear Learning · NeurIPS 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
personalization |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | CoBo: Collaborative Learning via Bilevel Optimization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Privacy and data protection
data ownership |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | COLA: Decentralized Linear Learning · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic gradient descent · 1.5alternating optimization · 1.5byzantine-robust aggregation · 1.1bucketing · 1.1minimax optimal rate analysis · 0.9l1-regularized estimator · 0.9variance reduction · 0.7stochastic extrapolation · 0.7worker momentum · 0.5stochastic optimization · 0.5robust aggregation · 0.5gradient clipping · 0.5decentralized training · 0.3communication efficiency · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Leveraging Sparsity for Sample-Efficient Preference Learning: A Theoretical PerspectiveabstractThis paper considers the sample-efficiency of preference learning, which models and predicts human choices based on comparative judgments. The minimax optimal estimation error rate $\Theta(d/n)$ in classical estimation theory requires that the number of samples $n$ scales linearly with the dimensionality of the feature space $d$. However, the high dimensionality of the feature space and the high cost of collecting human-annotated data challenge the efficiency of traditional estimation methods. To remedy this, we leverage sparsity in the preference model and establish sharp error rates. We show that under the sparse random utility model, where the parameter of the reward function is $k$-sparse, the minimax optimal rate can be reduced to $\Theta(k/n \log(d/k))$. Furthermore, we analyze the $\ell_{1}$-regularized estimator and show that it achieves near-optimal rate under mild assumptions on the Gram matrix.
Experiments on synthetic data and LLM alignment data validate our theoretical findings, showing that sparsity-aware methods significantly reduce sample complexity and improve prediction accuracy. Yunzhen Yao, Lie He, Michael Gastpar |
ICML | 2 |
| 2024 | CoBo: Collaborative Learning via Bilevel OptimizationabstractCollaborative learning is an important tool to train multiple clients more effectively by enabling communication among clients. Identifying helpful clients, however, presents challenging and often introduces significant overhead. In this paper, we model **client-selection** and **model-training** as two interconnected optimization problems, proposing a novel bilevel optimization problem for collaborative learning.
We introduce **CoBo**, a *scalable* and *elastic*, SGD-type alternating optimization algorithm that efficiently addresses these problem with theoretical convergence guarantees. Empirically, **CoBo** achieves superior performance, surpassing popular personalization algorithms by 9.3% in accuracy on a task with high heterogeneity, involving datasets distributed among 80 clients. Diba Hashemi, Lie He, Martin Jaggi |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | Debiasing Conditional Stochastic OptimizationabstractIn this paper, we study the conditional stochastic optimization (CSO) problem which covers a variety of applications including portfolio selection, reinforcement learning, robust learning, causal inference, etc. The sample-averaged gradient of the CSO objective is biased due to its nested structure, and therefore requires a high sample complexity for convergence. We introduce a general stochastic extrapolation technique that effectively reduces the bias. We show that for nonconvex smooth objectives, combining this extrapolation with variance reduction techniques can achieve a significantly better sample complexity than the existing bounds. Additionally, we develop new algorithms for the finite-sum variant of the CSO problem that also significantly improve upon existing results. Finally, we believe that our debiasing technique has the potential to be a useful tool for addressing similar challenges in other stochastic optimization problems. Lie He, Shiva Prasad Kasiviswanathan |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Byzantine-Robust Learning on Heterogeneous Datasets via Bucketing
Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Lie He, Martin Jaggi |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2021 | Learning from History for Byzantine Robust OptimizationabstractByzantine robustness has received significant attention recently given its importance for distributed and federated learning. In spite of this, we identify severe flaws in existing algorithms even when the data across the participants is identically distributed. First, we show realistic examples where current state of the art robust aggregation rules fail to converge even in the absence of any Byzantine attackers. Secondly, we prove that even if the aggregation rules may succeed in limiting the influence of the attackers in a single round, the attackers can couple their attacks across time eventually leading to divergence. To address these issues, we present two surprisingly simple strategies: a new robust iterative clipping procedure, and incorporating worker momentum to overcome time-coupled attacks. This is the first provably robust method for the standard stochastic optimization setting. Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Lie He, Martin Jaggi |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | RelaySum for Decentralized Deep Learning on Heterogeneous DataabstractIn decentralized machine learning, workers compute model updates on their local data.Because the workers only communicate with few neighbors without central coordination, these updates propagate progressively over the network.This paradigm enables distributed training on networks without all-to-all connectivity, helping to protect data privacy as well as to reduce the communication cost of distributed training in data centers.A key challenge, primarily in decentralized deep learning, remains the handling of differences between the workers' local data distributions.To tackle this challenge, we introduce the RelaySum mechanism for information propagation in decentralized learning.RelaySum uses spanning trees to distribute information exactly uniformly across all workers with finite delays depending on the distance between nodes.In contrast, the typical gossip averaging mechanism only distributes data uniformly asymptotically while using the same communication volume per step as RelaySum.We prove that RelaySGD, based on this mechanism, is independent of data heterogeneity and scales to many workers, enabling highly accurate decentralized deep learning on heterogeneous data. Thijs Vogels, Lie He, Anastasia Koloskova, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Tao Lin 0004, Sebastian U. Stich, Martin Jaggi |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2018 | COLA: Decentralized Linear LearningabstractDecentralized machine learning is a promising emerging paradigm in view of global challenges of data ownership and privacy. We consider learning of linear classification and regression models, in the setting where the training data is decentralized over many user devices, and the learning algorithm must run on-device, on an arbitrary communication network, without a central coordinator. We propose COLA, a new decentralized training algorithm with strong theoretical guarantees and superior practical performance. Our framework overcomes many limitations of existing methods, and achieves communication efficiency, scalability, elasticity as well as resilience to changes in data and allows for unreliable and heterogeneous participating devices. Lie He, Yatao Bian, Martin Jaggi |
NeurIPS | 1 |