Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lie He

dblp:225/5245 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 50% Learning theory · 24% Reinforcement learning · 16%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 81% Computational complexity · 19%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 23 heaviest of 23, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training
1.022021
RelaySum for Decentralized Deep Learning on Heterogeneous Data · NeurIPS 2021
Learning from History for Byzantine Robust Optimization · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics
high-dimensional estimation
0.912025
Leveraging Sparsity for Sample-Efficient Preference Learning: A Theoretical Perspective · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
preference learning
0.912025
Leveraging Sparsity for Sample-Efficient Preference Learning: A Theoretical Perspective · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
reward modeling
0.912025
Leveraging Sparsity for Sample-Efficient Preference Learning: A Theoretical Perspective · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.912025
Leveraging Sparsity for Sample-Efficient Preference Learning: A Theoretical Perspective · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics
sparse estimation
0.912025
Leveraging Sparsity for Sample-Efficient Preference Learning: A Theoretical Perspective · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
decentralized learning
0.822021
RelaySum for Decentralized Deep Learning on Heterogeneous Data · NeurIPS 2021
COLA: Decentralized Linear Learning · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
collaborative learning
0.812024
CoBo: Collaborative Learning via Bilevel Optimization · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated and distributed training
0.812024
CoBo: Collaborative Learning via Bilevel Optimization · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization
bilevel optimization
0.812024
CoBo: Collaborative Learning via Bilevel Optimization · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
0.722022
Learning from History for Byzantine Robust Optimization · ICML 2021
Byzantine-Robust Learning on Heterogeneous Datasets via Bucketing · ICLR 2022
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
conditional stochastic optimization
0.712023
Debiasing Conditional Stochastic Optimization · NeurIPS 2023
Mathematical optimization
convergence analysis
0.712023
Debiasing Conditional Stochastic Optimization · NeurIPS 2023
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity
0.712023
Debiasing Conditional Stochastic Optimization · NeurIPS 2023
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization
0.712023
Debiasing Conditional Stochastic Optimization · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.612022
Byzantine-Robust Learning on Heterogeneous Datasets via Bucketing · ICLR 2022
Distributed systems
distributed machine learning
0.612022
Byzantine-Robust Learning on Heterogeneous Datasets via Bucketing · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
communication-efficient training
0.512021
RelaySum for Decentralized Deep Learning on Heterogeneous Data · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
data heterogeneity
0.512021
RelaySum for Decentralized Deep Learning on Heterogeneous Data · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › model aggregation
robust aggregation
0.512021
Learning from History for Byzantine Robust Optimization · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
distributed optimization
0.312018
COLA: Decentralized Linear Learning · NeurIPS 2018
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
personalization
0.212024
CoBo: Collaborative Learning via Bilevel Optimization · NeurIPS 2024
Privacy and data protection
data ownership
0.112018
COLA: Decentralized Linear Learning · NeurIPS 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic gradient descent · 1.5alternating optimization · 1.5byzantine-robust aggregation · 1.1bucketing · 1.1minimax optimal rate analysis · 0.9l1-regularized estimator · 0.9variance reduction · 0.7stochastic extrapolation · 0.7worker momentum · 0.5stochastic optimization · 0.5robust aggregation · 0.5gradient clipping · 0.5decentralized training · 0.3communication efficiency · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Leveraging Sparsity for Sample-Efficient Preference Learning: A Theoretical Perspective
abstract
This paper considers the sample-efficiency of preference learning, which models and predicts human choices based on comparative judgments. The minimax optimal estimation error rate $\Theta(d/n)$ in classical estimation theory requires that the number of samples $n$ scales linearly with the dimensionality of the feature space $d$. However, the high dimensionality of the feature space and the high cost of collecting human-annotated data challenge the efficiency of traditional estimation methods. To remedy this, we leverage sparsity in the preference model and establish sharp error rates. We show that under the sparse random utility model, where the parameter of the reward function is $k$-sparse, the minimax optimal rate can be reduced to $\Theta(k/n \log(d/k))$. Furthermore, we analyze the $\ell_{1}$-regularized estimator and show that it achieves near-optimal rate under mild assumptions on the Gram matrix. Experiments on synthetic data and LLM alignment data validate our theoretical findings, showing that sparsity-aware methods significantly reduce sample complexity and improve prediction accuracy.
Yunzhen Yao, Lie He, Michael Gastpar
ICML2
2024 CoBo: Collaborative Learning via Bilevel Optimization
abstract
Collaborative learning is an important tool to train multiple clients more effectively by enabling communication among clients. Identifying helpful clients, however, presents challenging and often introduces significant overhead. In this paper, we model **client-selection** and **model-training** as two interconnected optimization problems, proposing a novel bilevel optimization problem for collaborative learning. We introduce **CoBo**, a *scalable* and *elastic*, SGD-type alternating optimization algorithm that efficiently addresses these problem with theoretical convergence guarantees. Empirically, **CoBo** achieves superior performance, surpassing popular personalization algorithms by 9.3% in accuracy on a task with high heterogeneity, involving datasets distributed among 80 clients.
Diba Hashemi, Lie He, Martin Jaggi
NeurIPS2
2023 Debiasing Conditional Stochastic Optimization
abstract
In this paper, we study the conditional stochastic optimization (CSO) problem which covers a variety of applications including portfolio selection, reinforcement learning, robust learning, causal inference, etc. The sample-averaged gradient of the CSO objective is biased due to its nested structure, and therefore requires a high sample complexity for convergence. We introduce a general stochastic extrapolation technique that effectively reduces the bias. We show that for nonconvex smooth objectives, combining this extrapolation with variance reduction techniques can achieve a significantly better sample complexity than the existing bounds. Additionally, we develop new algorithms for the finite-sum variant of the CSO problem that also significantly improve upon existing results. Finally, we believe that our debiasing technique has the potential to be a useful tool for addressing similar challenges in other stochastic optimization problems.
Lie He, Shiva Prasad Kasiviswanathan
NeurIPS1
2022 Byzantine-Robust Learning on Heterogeneous Datasets via Bucketing
Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Lie He, Martin Jaggi
ICLR2
2021 Learning from History for Byzantine Robust Optimization
abstract
Byzantine robustness has received significant attention recently given its importance for distributed and federated learning. In spite of this, we identify severe flaws in existing algorithms even when the data across the participants is identically distributed. First, we show realistic examples where current state of the art robust aggregation rules fail to converge even in the absence of any Byzantine attackers. Secondly, we prove that even if the aggregation rules may succeed in limiting the influence of the attackers in a single round, the attackers can couple their attacks across time eventually leading to divergence. To address these issues, we present two surprisingly simple strategies: a new robust iterative clipping procedure, and incorporating worker momentum to overcome time-coupled attacks. This is the first provably robust method for the standard stochastic optimization setting.
Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Lie He, Martin Jaggi
ICML2
2021 RelaySum for Decentralized Deep Learning on Heterogeneous Data
abstract
In decentralized machine learning, workers compute model updates on their local data.Because the workers only communicate with few neighbors without central coordination, these updates propagate progressively over the network.This paradigm enables distributed training on networks without all-to-all connectivity, helping to protect data privacy as well as to reduce the communication cost of distributed training in data centers.A key challenge, primarily in decentralized deep learning, remains the handling of differences between the workers' local data distributions.To tackle this challenge, we introduce the RelaySum mechanism for information propagation in decentralized learning.RelaySum uses spanning trees to distribute information exactly uniformly across all workers with finite delays depending on the distance between nodes.In contrast, the typical gossip averaging mechanism only distributes data uniformly asymptotically while using the same communication volume per step as RelaySum.We prove that RelaySGD, based on this mechanism, is independent of data heterogeneity and scales to many workers, enabling highly accurate decentralized deep learning on heterogeneous data.
Thijs Vogels, Lie He, Anastasia Koloskova, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Tao Lin 0004, Sebastian U. Stich, Martin Jaggi
NeurIPS2
2018 COLA: Decentralized Linear Learning
abstract
Decentralized machine learning is a promising emerging paradigm in view of global challenges of data ownership and privacy. We consider learning of linear classification and regression models, in the setting where the training data is decentralized over many user devices, and the learning algorithm must run on-device, on an arbitrary communication network, without a central coordinator. We propose COLA, a new decentralized training algorithm with strong theoretical guarantees and superior practical performance. Our framework overcomes many limitations of existing methods, and achieves communication efficiency, scalability, elasticity as well as resilience to changes in data and allows for unreliable and heterogeneous participating devices.
Lie He, Yatao Bian, Martin Jaggi
NeurIPS1