Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yova Kementchedjhieva
dblp:225/7708
· DBLP profile ↗
18ranked-venue papers
4as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 18 · 4 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
11 papers |
Vision and language · 27% Information extraction and text analysis · 17% Representation and self-supervised learning · 12% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 27 heaviest of 31, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
image captioning evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SPECS: Specificity-Enhanced CLIP-Score for Long Image Caption Evaluation · EMNLP 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual question answering
multilingual visual question answering |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CVQA: Culturally-diverse Multilingual Visual Question Answering Benchmark · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal benchmark |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CVQA: Culturally-diverse Multilingual Visual Question Answering Benchmark · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CVQA: Culturally-diverse Multilingual Visual Question Answering Benchmark · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
bilingual lexicon induction |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Lost in Evaluation: Misleading Benchmarks for Bilingual Dictionary Induction · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 A Discriminative Latent-Variable Model for Bilingual Lexicon Induction · EMNLP 2018 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
image captioning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Smallcap: Lightweight Image Captioning Prompted with Retrieval Augmentation · CVPR 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › image captioning › neural image captioning
retrieval-augmented image captioning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Smallcap: Lightweight Image Captioning Prompted with Retrieval Augmentation · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word embedding |
0.7 | 2 | 2018 | A Discriminative Latent-Variable Model for Bilingual Lexicon Induction · EMNLP 2018 Why is unsupervised alignment of English embeddings from different algorithms so hard? · EMNLP 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › dialogue analysis
conversation analysis |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Dynamic Forecasting of Conversation Derailment · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › dialogue analysis
conversation derailment forecasting |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Dynamic Forecasting of Conversation Derailment · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
metalinguistic reasoning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | PuzzLing Machines: A Challenge on Learning From Small Data · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
natural language understanding |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | PuzzLing Machines: A Challenge on Learning From Small Data · ACL 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
benchmark validity |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Lost in Evaluation: Misleading Benchmarks for Bilingual Dictionary Induction · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models › multilingual evaluation
cross-lingual evaluation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Lost in Evaluation: Misleading Benchmarks for Bilingual Dictionary Induction · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A systematic comparison of methods for low-resource dependency parsing on genuinely low-resource languages · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
distribution matching |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Comparing Unsupervised Word Translation Methods Step by Step · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Adversarial Removal of Demographic Attributes Revisited · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › knowledge discovery from text
knowledge base population |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Uncovering Probabilistic Implications in Typological Knowledge Bases · ACL (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › dependency parsing
low-resource dependency parsing |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A systematic comparison of methods for low-resource dependency parsing on genuinely low-resource languages · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › bilingual lexicon induction
unsupervised bilingual lexicon induction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Comparing Unsupervised Word Translation Methods Step by Step · NeurIPS 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › bilingual lexicon induction
unsupervised word translation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Comparing Unsupervised Word Translation Methods Step by Step · NeurIPS 2019 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
linguistic typology |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Uncovering Probabilistic Implications in Typological Knowledge Bases · ACL (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation › word embedding
cross-lingual embedding alignment |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Why is unsupervised alignment of English embeddings from different algorithms so hard? · EMNLP 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation › word embedding
cross-lingual word embedding |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Discriminative Latent-Variable Model for Bilingual Lexicon Induction · EMNLP 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
discriminative latent variable model |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Discriminative Latent-Variable Model for Bilingual Lexicon Induction · EMNLP 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation matching › feature alignment
embedding alignment |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Why is unsupervised alignment of English embeddings from different algorithms so hard? · EMNLP 2018 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Why is unsupervised alignment of English embeddings from different algorithms so hard? · EMNLP 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
CLIP · 1.5representational similarity · 0.9large language model · 0.9multimodal large language model benchmarking · 0.8generative adversarial network · 0.7retrieval augmentation · 0.7cross-attention · 0.7GPT-2 · 0.7pretrained language encoder · 0.5f1 evaluation · 0.5dynamic training · 0.5deep neural models · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SPECS: Specificity-Enhanced CLIP-Score for Long Image Caption EvaluationabstractAs interest grows in generating long, detailed image captions, standard evaluation metrics become increasingly unreliable.N-gram-based metrics though efficient, fail to capture semantic correctness.Representational Similarity (RS) metrics, designed to address this, initially saw limited use due to high computational costs, while today, despite advances in hardware, they remain unpopular due to low correlation to human judgments.Meanwhile, metrics based on large language models (LLMs) show strong correlation with human judgments, but remain too expensive for iterative use during model development.We introduce SPECS (Specificity-Enhanced CLIP-Score), a reference-free RS metric tailored to long image captioning.SPECS modifies CLIP with a new objective that emphasizes specificity: rewarding correct details and penalizing incorrect ones.We show that SPECS matches the performance of open-source LLMbased metrics in correlation to human judgments, while being far more efficient.This makes it a practical alternative for iterative checkpoint evaluation during image captioning model development. Xiaofu Chen, Israfel Salazar, Yova Kementchedjhieva |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2024 | CVQA: Culturally-diverse Multilingual Visual Question Answering BenchmarkabstractVisual Question Answering~(VQA) is an important task in multimodal AI, which requires models to understand and reason on knowledge present in visual and textual data. However, most of the current VQA datasets and models are primarily focused on English and a few major world languages, with images that are Western-centric. While recent efforts have tried to increase the number of languages covered on VQA datasets, they still lack diversity in low-resource languages. More importantly, some datasets extend the text to other languages, either via translation or some other approaches, but usually keep the same images, resulting in narrow cultural representation. To address these limitations, we create CVQA, a new Culturally-diverse Multilingual Visual Question Answering benchmark dataset, designed to cover a rich set of languages and regions, where we engage native speakers and cultural experts in the data collection process. CVQA includes culturally-driven images and questions from across 28 countries in four continents, covering 26 languages with 11 scripts, providing a total of 9k questions. We benchmark several Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on CVQA, and we show that the dataset is challenging for the current state-of-the-art models. This benchmark will serve as a probing evaluation suite for assessing the cultural bias of multimodal models and hopefully encourage more research efforts towards increasing cultural awareness and linguistic diversity in this field. Chenyang Lyu, Haryo Akbarianto Wibowo, Santiago Góngora, Aishik Mandal, Sukannya Purkayastha, Jesús-Germán Ortiz-Barajas, Emilio Villa-Cueva, Jinheon Baek, Soyeong Jeong, Injy Hamed, Zheng Wei Lim, Paula Mónica Silva, Jocelyn Dunstan, Mélanie Jouitteau, David Le Meur, Joan Nwatu, Ganzorig Batnasan, Munkh-Erdene Otgonbold, Munkhjargal Gochoo, Guido Ivetta, Luciana Benotti, Laura Alonso Alemany, Hernán Maina, Jiahui Geng, Tiago Timponi Torrent, Frederico Belcavello, Marcelo Viridiano, Jan Christian Blaise Cruz, Dan John Velasco, Oana Ignat, Zara Burzo, Chenxi Whitehouse, Artem Abzaliev, Teresa Clifford, Grainne Caulfield, Teresa Lynn, Christian Salamea Palacios, Vladimir Araujo, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Mihail Mihaylov, Israel Abebe Azime, Henok Biadglign Ademtew, Bontu Fufa Balcha, Naome A. Etori, David Ifeoluwa Adelani, Rada Mihalcea, Atnafu Lambebo Tonja, Maria Camila Buitrago Cabrera, Gisela Vallejo, Holy Lovenia, Ruochen Zhang 0001, Marcos Estecha-Garitagoitia, Mario Rodríguez-Cantelar, Toqeer Ehsan, Rendi Chevi, Muhammad Farid Adilazuarda, Ryandito Diandaru, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Fajri Koto, Tatsuki Kuribayashi, Haiyue Song, Aditya Khandavally, Thanmay Jayakumar, Raj Dabre, Mohamed Fazli Mohamed Imam, Kumaranage Ravindu Yasas Nagasinghe, Alina Dragonetti, Luis Fernando D'Haro, Olivier Niyomugisha, Jay Gala, Pranjal A. Chitale, Fauzan Farooqui, Thamar Solorio, Alham Fikri Aji |
NeurIPS | 41 |
| 2024 | Cultural Adaptation of RecipesabstractAbstract Building upon the considerable advances in Large Language Models (LLMs), we are now equipped to address more sophisticated tasks demanding a nuanced understanding of cross-cultural contexts. A key example is recipe adaptation, which goes beyond simple translation to include a grasp of ingredients, culinary techniques, and dietary preferences specific to a given culture. We introduce a new task involving the translation and cultural adaptation of recipes between Chinese- and English-speaking cuisines. To support this investigation, we present CulturalRecipes, a unique dataset composed of automatically paired recipes written in Mandarin Chinese and English. This dataset is further enriched with a human-written and curated test set. In this intricate task of cross-cultural recipe adaptation, we evaluate the performance of various methods, including GPT-4 and other LLMs, traditional machine translation, and information retrieval techniques. Our comprehensive analysis includes both automatic and human evaluation metrics. While GPT-4 exhibits impressive abilities in adapting Chinese recipes into English, it still lags behind human expertise when translating English recipes into Chinese. This underscores the multifaceted nature of cultural adaptations. We anticipate that these insights will significantly contribute to future research on culturally aware language models and their practical application in culturally diverse contexts. Yong Cao 0001, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Ruixiang Cui, Antonia Karamolegkou, Li Zhou 0010, Megan Dare, Lucia Donatelli, Daniel Hershcovich |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 2 |
| 2024 | Do Vision and Language Models Share Concepts? A Vector Space Alignment StudyabstractAbstract Large-scale pretrained language models (LMs) are said to “lack the ability to connect utterances to the world” (Bender and Koller, 2020), because they do not have “mental models of the world” (Mitchell and Krakauer, 2023). If so, one would expect LM representations to be unrelated to representations induced by vision models. We present an empirical evaluation across four families of LMs (BERT, GPT-2, OPT, and LLaMA-2) and three vision model architectures (ResNet, SegFormer, and MAE). Our experiments show that LMs partially converge towards representations isomorphic to those of vision models, subject to dispersion, polysemy, and frequency. This has important implications for both multi-modal processing and the LM understanding debate (Mitchell and Krakauer, 2023).1 Jiaang Li 0002, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Constanza Fierro, Anders Søgaard |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 2 |
| 2023 | Smallcap: Lightweight Image Captioning Prompted with Retrieval AugmentationabstractRecent advances in image captioning have focused on scaling the data and model size, substantially increasing the cost of pretraining and finetuning. As an alternative to large models, we present Smallcap, which generates a caption conditioned on an input image and related captions retrieved from a datastore. Our model is lightweight and fast to train, as the only learned parameters are in newly introduced cross-attention layers between a pre-trained CLIP encoder and GPT-2 decoder. Smallcap can transfer to new domains without additional finetuning and can exploit large-scale data in a training-free fashion since the contents of the datastore can be readily replaced. Our experiments show that Smallcap, trained only on COCO, has competitive performance on this benchmark, and also transfers to other domains without retraining, solely through retrieval from target-domain data. Further improvement is achieved through the training-free exploitation of diverse human-labeled and web data, which proves to be effective for a range of domains, including the nocaps benchmark, designed to test generalization to unseen visual concepts.11Code: https://github.com/RitaRamo/smallcap. Rita Ramos, Bruno Martins 0001, Desmond Elliott, Yova Kementchedjhieva |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2021 | A Multilingual Benchmark for Probing Negation-Awareness with Minimal PairsabstractMareike Hartmann, Miryam de Lhoneux, Daniel Hershcovich, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Lukas Nielsen, Chen Qiu, Anders Søgaard. Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. 2021. Mareike Hartmann, Miryam de Lhoneux, Daniel Hershcovich, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Lukas Nielsen, Chen Qiu 0005, Anders Søgaard |
CoNLL | 4 |
| 2021 | Dynamic Forecasting of Conversation DerailmentabstractOnline conversations can sometimes take a turn for the worse, either due to systematic cultural differences, accidental misunderstandings, or mere malice.Automatically forecasting derailment in public online conversations provides an opportunity to take early action to moderate it.Previous work in this space is limited, and we extend it in several ways.We apply a pretrained language encoder to the task, which outperforms earlier approaches.We further experiment with shifting the training paradigm for the task from a static to a dynamic one to increase the forecast horizon.This approach shows mixed results: in a highquality data setting, a longer average forecast horizon can be achieved at the cost of a small drop in F1; in a low-quality data setting, however, dynamic training propagates the noise and is highly detrimental to performance. Yova Kementchedjhieva, Anders Søgaard |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2020 | PuzzLing Machines: A Challenge on Learning From Small DataabstractDeep neural models have repeatedly proved excellent at memorizing surface patterns from large datasets for various ML and NLP benchmarks.They struggle to achieve human-like thinking, however, because they lack the skill of iterative reasoning upon knowledge.To expose this problem in a new light, we introduce a challenge on learning from small data, PuzzLing Machines, which consists of Rosetta Stone puzzles from Linguistic Olympiads for high school students.These puzzles are carefully designed to contain only the minimal amount of parallel text necessary to deduce the form of unseen expressions.Solving them does not require external information (e.g., knowledge bases, visual signals) or linguistic expertise, but meta-linguistic awareness and deductive skills.Our challenge contains around 100 puzzles covering a wide range of linguistic phenomena from 81 languages.We show that both simple statistical algorithms and state-of-the-art deep neural models perform inadequately on this challenge, as expected.We hope that this benchmark, available at https://ukplab.github.io/ PuzzLing-Machines/, inspires further efforts towards a new paradigm in NLP-one that is grounded in human-like reasoning and understanding. Gözde Gül Sahin, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Phillip Rust, Iryna Gurevych |
ACL | 2 |
| 2020 | The ApposCorpus: a new multilingual, multi-domain dataset for factual appositive generationabstractNews articles, image captions, product reviews and many other texts mention people and organizations whose name recognition could vary for different audiences.In such cases, background information about the named entities could be provided in the form of an appositive noun phrase, either written by a human or generated automatically.We expand on the previous work in appositive generation with a new, more realistic, end-to-end definition of the task, instantiated by a dataset that spans four languages (English, Spanish, German and Polish), two entity types (person and organization) and two domains (Wikipedia and News).We carry out an extensive analysis of the data and the task, pointing to the various modeling challenges it poses.The results we obtain with standard language generation methods show that the task is indeed non-trivial, and leaves plenty of room for improvement. Yova Kementchedjhieva, Di Lu 0003, Joel R. Tetreault |
COLING | 1 |
| 2019 | Uncovering Probabilistic Implications in Typological Knowledge BasesabstractThe study of linguistic typology is rooted in the implications we find between linguistic features, such as the fact that languages with object-verb word ordering tend to have postpositions. Uncovering such implications typically amounts to time-consuming manual processing by trained and experienced linguists, which potentially leaves key linguistic universals unexplored. In this paper, we present a computational model which successfully identifies known universals, including Greenberg universals, but also uncovers new ones, worthy of further linguistic investigation. Our approach outperforms baselines previously used for this problem, as well as a strong baseline from knowledge base population. Johannes Bjerva, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Ryan Cotterell, Isabelle Augenstein |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2019 | How Does Grammatical Gender Affect Noun Representations in Gender-Marking Languages?abstractMany natural languages assign grammatical gender also to inanimate nouns in the language.In such languages, words that relate to the gender-marked nouns are inflected to agree with the noun's gender.We show that this affects the word representations of inanimate nouns, resulting in nouns with the same gender being closer to each other than nouns with different gender.While "embedding debiasing" methods fail to remove the effect, we demonstrate that a careful application of methods that neutralize grammatical gender signals from the words' context when training word embeddings is effective in removing it.Fixing the grammatical gender bias yields a positive effect on the quality of the resulting word embeddings, both in monolingual and crosslingual settings.We note that successfully removing gender signals, while achievable, is not trivial to do and that a language-specific morphological analyzer, together with careful usage of it, are essential for achieving good results. Hila Gonen, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Yoav Goldberg |
CoNLL | 2 |
| 2019 | Adversarial Removal of Demographic Attributes RevisitedabstractMaria Barrett, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Yanai Elazar, Desmond Elliott, Anders Søgaard. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Maria Barrett, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Yanai Elazar, Desmond Elliott, Anders Søgaard |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 2 |
| 2019 | Lost in Evaluation: Misleading Benchmarks for Bilingual Dictionary InductionabstractYova Kementchedjhieva, Mareike Hartmann, Anders Søgaard. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Yova Kementchedjhieva, Mareike Hartmann, Anders Søgaard |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2019 | A systematic comparison of methods for low-resource dependency parsing on genuinely low-resource languagesabstractClara Vania, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Anders Søgaard, Adam Lopez. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Clara Vania, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Anders Søgaard, Adam Lopez |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 2 |
| 2019 | Comparing Unsupervised Word Translation Methods Step by StepabstractCross-lingual word vector space alignment is the task of mapping the vocabularies of two languages into a shared semantic space, which can be used for dictionary induction, unsupervised machine translation, and transfer learning. In the unsupervised regime, an initial seed dictionary is learned in the absence of any known correspondences between words, through {\bf distribution matching}, and the seed dictionary is then used to supervise the induction of the final alignment in what is typically referred to as a (possibly iterative) {\bf refinement} step. We focus on the first step and compare distribution matching techniques in the context of language pairs for which mixed training stability and evaluation scores have been reported. We show that, surprisingly, when looking at this initial step in isolation, vanilla GANs are superior to more recent methods, both in terms of precision and robustness. The improvements reported by more recent methods thus stem from the refinement techniques, and we show that we can obtain state-of-the-art performance combining vanilla GANs with such refinement techniques. Mareike Hartmann, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Anders Søgaard |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2018 | Generalizing Procrustes Analysis for Better Bilingual Dictionary InductionabstractMost recent approaches to bilingual dictionary induction find a linear alignment between the word vector spaces of two languages. We show that projecting the two languages onto a third, latent space, rather than directly onto each other, while equivalent in terms of expressivity, makes it easier to learn approximate alignments. Our modified approach also allows for supporting languages to be included in the alignment process, to obtain an even better performance in low resource settings. Yova Kementchedjhieva, Sebastian Ruder, Ryan Cotterell, Anders Søgaard |
CoNLL | 1 |
| 2018 | Why is unsupervised alignment of English embeddings from different algorithms so hard?abstractThis paper presents a challenge to the community: Generative adversarial networks (GANs) can perfectly align independent English word embeddings induced using the same algorithm, based on distributional information alone; but fails to do so, for two different embeddings algorithms.Why is that?We believe understanding why, is key to understand both modern word embedding algorithms and the limitations and instability dynamics of GANs.This paper shows that (a) in all these cases, where alignment fails, there exists a linear transform between the two embeddings (so algorithm biases do not lead to non-linear differences), and (b) similar effects can not easily be obtained by varying hyper-parameters.One plausible suggestion based on our initial experiments is that the differences in the inductive biases of the embedding algorithms lead to an optimization landscape that is riddled with local optima, leading to a very small basin of convergence, but we present this more as a challenge paper than a technical contribution. Mareike Hartmann, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Anders Søgaard |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2018 | A Discriminative Latent-Variable Model for Bilingual Lexicon InductionabstractWe introduce a novel discriminative latentvariable model for the task of bilingual lexicon induction.Our model combines the bipartite matching dictionary prior of Haghighi et al. (2008) with a state-of-the-art embeddingbased approach.To train the model, we derive an efficient Viterbi EM algorithm.We provide empirical improvements on six language pairs under two metrics and show that the prior theoretically and empirically helps to mitigate the hubness problem.We also demonstrate how previous work may be viewed as a similarly fashioned latent-variable model, albeit with a different prior. 1 * The first two authors contributed equally. Sebastian Ruder, Ryan Cotterell, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Anders Søgaard |
EMNLP | 3 |