Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sebastian Engelke

dblp:225/7710 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 61% Trustworthy machine learning · 39%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal effect estimation
1.012026
Boosted Control Functions: Distribution Generalization and Invariance in Confounded Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
1.012026
Boosted Control Functions: Distribution Generalization and Invariance in Confounded Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift
1.012026
Boosted Control Functions: Distribution Generalization and Invariance in Confounded Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
instrumental variable
1.012026
Boosted Control Functions: Distribution Generalization and Invariance in Confounded Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
invariance
1.012026
Boosted Control Functions: Distribution Generalization and Invariance in Confounded Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
1.012026
Boosted Control Functions: Distribution Generalization and Invariance in Confounded Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
latent variable graphical model
0.912025
Extremal graphical modeling with latent variables via convex optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.312025
Extremal graphical modeling with latent variables via convex optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

husler-reiss model · 1.7convex optimization · 1.7robust optimization · 1.0nonparametric regression · 1.0empirical risk minimization · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Boosted Control Functions: Distribution Generalization and Invariance in Confounded Models
abstract
Modern machine learning methods and the availability of large-scale data have significantly advanced our ability to predict target quantities from large sets of covariates. However, these methods often struggle under distributional shifts, particularly in the presence of hidden confounding. While the impact of hidden confounding is well-studied in causal effect estimation, e.g., instrumental variables, its implications for prediction tasks under shifting distributions remain underexplored. This work addresses this gap by introducing a strong notion of invariance that, unlike existing weaker notions, allows for distribution generalization even in the presence of nonlinear, non-identifiable structural functions. Central to this framework is the Boosted Control Function (BCF), a novel, identifiable target of inference that satisfies the proposed strong invariance notion and is provably worst-case optimal under distributional shifts. The theoretical foundation of our work lies in Simultaneous Equation Models for Distribution Generalization (SIMDGs), which bridge machine learning with econometrics by describing data-generating processes under distributional shifts. To put these insights into practice, we propose the ControlTwicing algorithm to estimate the BCF using nonparametric machine-learning techniques and study its generalization performance on synthetic and real-world datasets compared to robust and empirical risk minimization approaches.
Nicola Gnecco, Jonas Peters, Sebastian Engelke, Niklas Pfister
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2025 Extremal graphical modeling with latent variables via convex optimization
abstract
Extremal graphical models encode the conditional independence structure of multivariate extremes and provide a powerful tool for quantifying the risk of rare events. Prior work on learning these graphs from data has focused on the setting where all relevant variables are observed. For the popular class of Husler-Reiss models, we propose the eglatent method, a tractable convex program for learning extremal graphical models in the presence of latent variables. Our approach decomposes the Husler-Reiss precision matrix into a sparse component encoding the graphical structure among the observed variables after conditioning on the latent variables, and a low-rank component encoding the effect of a few latent variables on the observed variables. We provide finite-sample guarantees of eglatent and show that it consistently recovers the conditional graph as well as the number of latent variables. We highlight the improved performances of our approach on synthetic and real data.
Sebastian Engelke, Armeen Taeb
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1