Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jayzon Flores Ty

dblp:225/8429 · also J. Flores Ty, Jayzon F. Ty · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Virtual and augmented reality · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Virtual and augmented reality › virtual environment
immersive training
0.312018
Transferability of Spatial Maps: Augmented Versus Virtual Reality Training · VR 2018
Virtual and augmented reality
training transfer
0.312018
Transferability of Spatial Maps: Augmented Versus Virtual Reality Training · VR 2018
Virtual and augmented reality
augmented reality
0.112018
Transferability of Spatial Maps: Augmented Versus Virtual Reality Training · VR 2018
Virtual and augmented reality › augmented reality › augmented reality applications
augmented reality training
0.112018
Transferability of Spatial Maps: Augmented Versus Virtual Reality Training · VR 2018
Human-robot interaction › cognitive human-robot interaction › spatial cognition
spatial memory
0.112018
Transferability of Spatial Maps: Augmented Versus Virtual Reality Training · VR 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

within-subject study · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Design and Development of "Slow Art" Experience for Tapaya's Earthly Desires
Jayzon Flores Ty, Walfrido David A. Diy, Ma. Mercedes T. Rodrigo
ICCE1
2018 Transferability of Spatial Maps: Augmented Versus Virtual Reality Training
abstract
Work space simulations help trainees acquire skills necessary to perform their tasks efficiently without disrupting the workflow, forgetting important steps during a procedure, or the location of important information. This training can be conducted in Augmented and Virtual Reality (AR, VR) to enhance its effectiveness and speed. When the skills are transferred to the actual application, it is referred to as positive training transfer. However, thus far, it is unclear which training, AR or VR, achieves better results in terms of positive training transfer. We compare the effectiveness of AR and VR for spatial memory training in a control-room scenario, where users have to memorize the location of buttons and information displays in their surroundings. We conducted a within-subject study with 16 participants and evaluated the impact the training had on short-term and long-term memory. Results of our study show that VR outperformed AR when tested in the same medium after the training. In a memory transfer test conducted two days later AR outperformed VR. Our findings have implications on the design of future training scenarios and applications.
Nicko R. Caluya, Alexander Plopski, Jayzon Flores Ty, Christian Sandor, Takafumi Taketomi, Hirokazu Kato 0001
VR3
2014 Authoring Augmented Reality as Situated Multimedia
abstract
Augmented reality (AR) is an enabling technology for presenting information in relation to real objects or real environments. AR is situated multimedia or information that is positioned in authentic physical contexts. In this paper, we discuss how we address issues in creating AR content for educational settings. From the learning theory perspective, we explain that AR is a logical extension of multimedia learning theory. From the development perspective, we demonstrate how AR content can be created through our in situ authoring tool and our platform for handheld AR.
Marc Ericson C. Santos, Jayzon Flores Ty, Arno in Wolde Lübke, Ma. Mercedes T. Rodrigo, Takafumi Taketomi, Goshiro Yamamoto, Christian Sandor, Hirokazu Kato 0001
ICCE2