Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sanatan Sharma
dblp:226/2544
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Wireless sensing and localization · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wireless sensing and localization › localization algorithms
deep learning based localization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Deep learning based wireless localization for indoor navigation · MobiCom 2020 |
Wireless sensing and localization
indoor localization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Deep learning based wireless localization for indoor navigation · MobiCom 2020 |
Wireless sensing and localization › indoor localization
wifi localization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Deep learning based wireless localization for indoor navigation · MobiCom 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
wifi fingerprinting · 0.4deep learning · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Deep learning based wireless localization for indoor navigationabstractLocation services, fundamentally, rely on two components: a mapping system and a positioning system. The mapping system provides the physical map of the space, and the positioning system identifies the position within the map. Outdoor location services have thrived over the last couple of decades because of well-established platforms for both these components (e.g. Google Maps for mapping, and GPS for positioning). In contrast, indoor location services haven't caught up because of the lack of reliable mapping and positioning frameworks. Wi-Fi positioning lacks maps and is also prone to environmental errors. In this paper, we present DLoc, a Deep Learning based wireless localization algorithm that can overcome traditional limitations of RF-based localization approaches (like multipath, occlusions, etc.). We augment DLoc with an automated mapping platform, MapFind. MapFind constructs location-tagged maps of the environment and generates training data for DLoc. Together, they allow off-the-shelf Wi-Fi devices like smartphones to access a map of the environment and to estimate their position with respect to that map. During our evaluation, MapFind has collected location estimates of over 105 thousand points under 8 different scenarios with varying furniture positions and people motion across two different spaces covering 2000 sq. Ft. DLoc outperforms state-of-the-art methods in Wi-Fi-based localization by 80% (median & 90th percentile) across the two different spaces. Roshan Sai Ayyalasomayajula, Aditya Arun 0002, Chenfeng Wu, Sanatan Sharma, Abhishek Rajkumar Sethi, Deepak Vasisht, Dinesh Bharadia |
MobiCom | 4 |
| 2018 | Class Specific Coders for Hyper-Spectral Image ClassificationabstractIn this paper, we introduce the paradigm of class specific coders (CSC) for classification of hyper-spectral images (HSI). Apparently, CSC are defined as a set of distinct encoder-decoder (henceforth called a coder) networks where a given coder is trained on the samples of a particular class. In contrast to auto-encoders (AE) which learn an identity mapping of data in an unsupervised fashion, the CSC model, on the other hand, learns re-constructive mappings for all possible pairs of training samples for each class in separate coders. Further, for reducing redundancy, it is ensured that the latent space dimensions of the coders are orthogonal to each other. Once the CSC are trained, we introduce a feature encoding by concatenating the latent representations of all the class specific coders. Experimental results obtained on the benchmark Botswana and Indian Pines datasets ensure that the CSC model outperforms a number of AE variants significantly. Sanatan Sharma, Akashdeep Goel, Omkar Gune, Biplab Banerjee, Subhasis Chaudhuri |
ICIP | 1 |