Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marc Rigter

dblp:226/6276 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
7as first author
9since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-5219-8552ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 7 first-author · 9 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
10 papers
Reinforcement learning · 66% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 9% Trustworthy machine learning · 9%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 56% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 44%

Topics — the 30 heaviest of 31, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
2.642024
TWIST: Teacher-Student World Model Distillation for Efficient Sim-to-Real Transfer · ICRA 2024
Reward-Free Curricula for Training Robust World Models · ICLR 2024
RAMBO-RL: Robust Adversarial Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning
world model
1.522024
TWIST: Teacher-Student World Model Distillation for Efficient Sim-to-Real Transfer · ICRA 2024
Reward-Free Curricula for Training Robust World Models · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning
1.222023
One Risk to Rule Them All: A Risk-Sensitive Perspective on Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023
RAMBO-RL: Robust Adversarial Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning
risk-sensitive reinforcement learning
1.222023
One Risk to Rule Them All: A Risk-Sensitive Perspective on Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Risk-Averse Bayes-Adaptive Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration
0.812024
Reward-Free Curricula for Training Robust World Models · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration › exploration in markov decision processes
reward-free exploration
0.812024
Reward-Free Curricula for Training Robust World Models · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
sim-to-real transfer
0.812024
TWIST: Teacher-Student World Model Distillation for Efficient Sim-to-Real Transfer · ICRA 2024
Mathematical optimization › sequential decision making
markov decision processes
0.722022
Optimal Admission Control for Multiclass Queues with Time-Varying Arrival Rates via State Abstraction · AAAI 2022
Minimax Regret Optimisation for Robust Planning in Uncertain Markov Decision Processes · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process › Bayesian MDP
bayes-adaptive markov decision process
0.712023
Planning with Hidden Parameter Polynomial MDPs · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bayesian reinforcement learning
0.712023
Planning with Hidden Parameter Polynomial MDPs · AAAI 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
belief representation
0.712023
Planning with Hidden Parameter Polynomial MDPs · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
distributional shift
0.712023
One Risk to Rule Them All: A Risk-Sensitive Perspective on Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
epistemic uncertainty
0.712023
One Risk to Rule Them All: A Risk-Sensitive Perspective on Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process
0.712023
Planning with Hidden Parameter Polynomial MDPs · AAAI 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
decision making under uncertainty
0.612022
Shared Autonomy Systems with Stochastic Operator Models · IJCAI 2022
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty › partially observable markov decision process
mixed observability markov decision process
0.612022
Shared Autonomy Systems with Stochastic Operator Models · IJCAI 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › offline reinforcement learning
model-based offline reinforcement learning
0.612022
RAMBO-RL: Robust Adversarial Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022
Human-robot interaction
shared control
0.612022
Shared Autonomy Systems with Stochastic Operator Models · IJCAI 2022
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › resource allocation › online resource allocation
admission control
0.612022
Optimal Admission Control for Multiclass Queues with Time-Varying Arrival Rates via State Abstraction · AAAI 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › meta-reinforcement learning
bayes-adaptive reinforcement learning
0.512021
Risk-Averse Bayes-Adaptive Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning › risk-sensitive reinforcement learning
conditional value-at-risk
0.512021
Risk-Averse Bayes-Adaptive Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning › regret bounds
minimax regret
0.512021
Minimax Regret Optimisation for Robust Planning in Uncertain Markov Decision Processes · AAAI 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
planning under uncertainty
0.512021
Minimax Regret Optimisation for Robust Planning in Uncertain Markov Decision Processes · AAAI 2021
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots
quadrotor
0.312018
Differential Flatness Transformations for Aggressive Quadrotor Flight · ICRA 2018
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › sim-to-real transfer
domain randomization
0.212024
Reward-Free Curricula for Training Robust World Models · ICLR 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning
0.212024
TWIST: Teacher-Student World Model Distillation for Efficient Sim-to-Real Transfer · ICRA 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.212024
Reward-Free Curricula for Training Robust World Models · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation › representation learning for reinforcement learning
state abstraction
0.212022
Optimal Admission Control for Multiclass Queues with Time-Varying Arrival Rates via State Abstraction · AAAI 2022
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › trajectory planning
differential flatness
0.112018
Differential Flatness Transformations for Aggressive Quadrotor Flight · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory planning
0.112018
Differential Flatness Transformations for Aggressive Quadrotor Flight · ICRA 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dynamic programming · 2.1state abstraction · 1.1minimax regret · 0.8knowledge distillation · 0.8domain randomization · 0.8curriculum learning · 0.8risk aversion · 0.7particle filtering · 0.7model ensemble · 0.7closed-form polynomial belief representation · 0.7partially observable models · 0.6mixed-observability markov decision process · 0.6bellman equation · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Reward-Free Curricula for Training Robust World Models
abstract
There has been a recent surge of interest in developing generally-capable agents that can adapt to new tasks without additional training in the environment. Learning world models from reward-free exploration is a promising approach, and enables policies to be trained using imagined experience for new tasks. However, achieving a general agent requires robustness across different environments. In this work, we address the novel problem of generating curricula in the reward-free setting to train robust world models. We consider robustness in terms of minimax regret over all environment instantiations and show that the minimax regret can be connected to minimising the maximum error in the world model across environment instances. This result informs our algorithm, WAKER: Weighted Acquisition of Knowledge across Environments for Robustness. WAKER selects environments for data collection based on the estimated error of the world model for each environment. Our experiments demonstrate that WAKER outperforms naı̈ve domain randomisation, resulting in improved robustness, efficiency, and generalisation.
Marc Rigter, Minqi Jiang, Ingmar Posner
ICLR1
2024 TWIST: Teacher-Student World Model Distillation for Efficient Sim-to-Real Transfer
abstract
Model-based RL is a promising approach for real-world robotics due to its improved sample efficiency and generalization capabilities compared to model-free RL. However, effective model-based RL solutions for vision-based real-world applications require bridging the sim-to-real gap for any world model learnt. Due to its significant computational cost, standard domain randomisation does not provide an effective solution to this problem. This paper proposes TWIST (Teacher-Student World Model Distillation for Sim-to-Real Transfer) to achieve efficient sim-to-real transfer of vision-based model-based RL using distillation. Specifically, TWIST leverages state observations as readily accessible, privileged information commonly garnered from a simulator to significantly accelerate sim-to-real transfer. Specifically, a teacher world model is trained efficiently on state information. At the same time, a matching dataset is collected of domain-randomised image observations. The teacher world model then supervises a student world model that takes the domain-randomised image observations as input. By distilling the learned latent dynamics model from the teacher to the student model, TWIST achieves efficient and effective sim-to-real transfer for vision-based model-based RL tasks. Experiments in simulated and real robotics tasks demonstrate that our approach outperforms naive domain randomisation and model-free methods in terms of sample efficiency and task performance of sim-to-real transfer.
Jun Yamada, Marc Rigter, Jack Collins, Ingmar Posner
ICRA2
2023 Planning with Hidden Parameter Polynomial MDPs
abstract
For many applications of Markov Decision Processes (MDPs), the transition function cannot be specified exactly. Bayes-Adaptive MDPs (BAMDPs) extend MDPs to consider transition probabilities governed by latent parameters. To act optimally in BAMDPs, one must maintain a belief distribution over the latent parameters. Typically, this distribution is described by a set of sample (particle) MDPs, and associated weights which represent the likelihood of a sample MDP being the true underlying MDP. However, as the number of dimensions of the latent parameter space increases, the number of sample MDPs required to sufficiently represent the belief distribution grows exponentially. Thus, maintaining an accurate belief in the form of a set of sample MDPs over complex latent spaces is computationally intensive, which in turn affects the performance of planning for these models. In this paper, we propose an alternative approach for maintaining the belief over the latent parameters. We consider a class of BAMDPs where the transition probabilities can be expressed in closed form as a polynomial of the latent parameters, and outline a method to maintain a closed-form belief distribution for the latent parameters which results in an accurate belief representation. Furthermore, the closed-form representation does away with the need to tune the number of sample MDPs required to represent the belief. We evaluate two domains and empirically show that the polynomial, closed-form, belief representation results in better plans than a sampling-based belief representation.
Clarissa Costen, Marc Rigter, Bruno Lacerda, Nick Hawes
AAAI2
2023 One Risk to Rule Them All: A Risk-Sensitive Perspective on Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Offline reinforcement learning (RL) is suitable for safety-critical domains where online exploration is not feasible. In such domains, decision-making should take into consideration the risk of catastrophic outcomes. In other words, decision-making should be *risk-averse*. An additional challenge of offline RL is avoiding *distributional shift*, i.e. ensuring that state-action pairs visited by the policy remain near those in the dataset. Previous offline RL algorithms that consider risk combine offline RL techniques (to avoid distributional shift), with risk-sensitive RL algorithms (to achieve risk-aversion). In this work, we propose risk-aversion as a mechanism to jointly address *both* of these issues. We propose a model-based approach, and use an ensemble of models to estimate epistemic uncertainty, in addition to aleatoric uncertainty. We train a policy that is risk-averse, and avoids high uncertainty actions. Risk-aversion to epistemic uncertainty prevents distributional shift, as areas not covered by the dataset have high epistemic uncertainty. Risk-aversion to aleatoric uncertainty discourages actions that are risky due to environment stochasticity. Thus, by considering epistemic uncertainty via a model ensemble and introducing risk-aversion, our algorithm (1R2R) avoids distributional shift in addition to achieving risk-aversion to aleatoric risk. Our experiments show that 1R2R achieves strong performance on deterministic benchmarks, and outperforms existing approaches for risk-sensitive objectives in stochastic domains.
Marc Rigter, Bruno Lacerda, Nick Hawes
NeurIPS1
2022 Optimal Admission Control for Multiclass Queues with Time-Varying Arrival Rates via State Abstraction
abstract
We consider a novel queuing problem where the decision-maker must choose to accept or reject randomly arriving tasks into a no buffer queue which are processed by N identical servers. Each task has a price, which is a positive real number, and a class. Each class of task has a different price distribution, service rate, and arrives according to an inhomogenous Poisson process. The objective is to decide which tasks to accept so that the total price of tasks processed is maximised over a finite horizon. We formulate the problem using a discrete time Markov Decision Process (MDP) with a hybrid state space. We show that the optimal value function has a specific structure, which enables us to solve the hybrid MDP exactly. Moreover, we rigorously prove that as the gap between successive decision epochs grows smaller, the discrete time solution approaches the optimal solution to the original continuous time problem. To improve the scalability of our approach to a greater number of servers and task classes, we present an approximation based on state abstraction. We validate our approach on synthetic data, as well as a real financial fraud data set, which is the motivating application for this work.
Marc Rigter, Danial Dervovic, Parisa Hassanzadeh, Jason Long, Parisa Zehtabi, Daniele Magazzeni
AAAI1
2022 Shared Autonomy Systems with Stochastic Operator Models
abstract
We consider shared autonomy systems where multiple operators (AI and human), can interact with the environment, e.g. by controlling a robot. The decision problem for the shared autonomy system is to select which operator takes control at each timestep, such that a reward specifying the intended system behaviour is maximised. The performance of the human operator is influenced by unobserved factors, such as fatigue or skill level. Therefore, the system must reason over stochastic models of operator performance. We present a framework for stochastic operators in shared autonomy systems (SO-SAS), where we represent operators using rich, partially observable models. We formalise SO-SAS as a mixed-observability Markov decision process, where environment states are fully observable and internal operator states are hidden. We test SO-SAS on a simulated domain and a computer game, empirically showing it results in better performance compared to traditional formulations of shared autonomy systems.
Clarissa Costen, Marc Rigter, Bruno Lacerda, Nick Hawes
IJCAI2
2022 RAMBO-RL: Robust Adversarial Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Offline reinforcement learning (RL) aims to find performant policies from logged data without further environment interaction. Model-based algorithms, which learn a model of the environment from the dataset and perform conservative policy optimisation within that model, have emerged as a promising approach to this problem. In this work, we present Robust Adversarial Model-Based Offline RL (RAMBO), a novel approach to model-based offline RL. We formulate the problem as a two-player zero sum game against an adversarial environment model. The model is trained to minimise the value function while still accurately predicting the transitions in the dataset, forcing the policy to act conservatively in areas not covered by the dataset. To approximately solve the two-player game, we alternate between optimising the policy and adversarially optimising the model. The problem formulation that we address is theoretically grounded, resulting in a probably approximately correct (PAC) performance guarantee and a pessimistic value function which lower bounds the value function in the true environment. We evaluate our approach on widely studied offline RL benchmarks, and demonstrate that it outperforms existing state-of-the-art baselines.
Marc Rigter, Bruno Lacerda, Nick Hawes
NeurIPS1
2021 Minimax Regret Optimisation for Robust Planning in Uncertain Markov Decision Processes
abstract
The parameters for a Markov Decision Process (MDP) often cannot be specified exactly. Uncertain MDPs (UMDPs) capture this model ambiguity by defining sets which the parameters belong to. Minimax regret has been proposed as an objective for planning in UMDPs to find robust policies which are not overly conservative. In this work, we focus on planning for Stochastic Shortest Path (SSP) UMDPs with uncertain cost and transition functions. We introduce a Bellman equation to compute the regret for a policy. We propose a dynamic programming algorithm that utilises the regret Bellman equation, and show that it optimises minimax regret exactly for UMDPs with independent uncertainties. For coupled uncertainties, we extend our approach to use options to enable a trade off between computation and solution quality. We evaluate our approach on both synthetic and real-world domains, showing that it significantly outperforms existing baselines.
Marc Rigter, Bruno Lacerda, Nick Hawes
AAAI1
2021 Risk-Averse Bayes-Adaptive Reinforcement Learning
abstract
In this work, we address risk-averse Bayes-adaptive reinforcement learning. We pose the problem of optimising the conditional value at risk (CVaR) of the total return in Bayes-adaptive Markov decision processes (MDPs). We show that a policy optimising CVaR in this setting is risk-averse to both the epistemic uncertainty due to the prior distribution over MDPs, and the aleatoric uncertainty due to the inherent stochasticity of MDPs. We reformulate the problem as a two-player stochastic game and propose an approximate algorithm based on Monte Carlo tree search and Bayesian optimisation. Our experiments demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms baseline approaches for this problem.
Marc Rigter, Bruno Lacerda, Nick Hawes
NeurIPS1
2019 An Autonomous Quadrotor System for Robust High-Speed Flight Through Cluttered Environments Without GPS
abstract
Robust autonomous flight without GPS is key to many emerging drone applications, such as delivery, search and rescue, and warehouse inspection. These and other applications require accurate trajectory tracking through cluttered static environments, where GPS can be unreliable, while high-speed, agile, flight can increase efficiency. We describe the hardware and software of a quadrotor system that meets these requirements with onboard processing: a custom 300 mm wide quadrotor that uses two wide-field-of-view cameras for visual-inertial motion tracking and relocalization to a prior map. Collision-free trajectories are planned offline and tracked online with a custom tracking controller. This controller includes compensation for drag and variability in propeller performance, enabling accurate trajectory tracking, even at high speeds where aerodynamic effects are significant. We describe a system identification approach that identifies quadrotor-specific parameters via maximum likelihood estimation from flight data. Results from flight experiments are presented, which 1) validate the system identification method, 2) show that our controller with aerodynamic compensation reduces tracking error by more than 50% in both horizontal flights at up to 8.5 m/s and vertical flights at up to 3.1 m/s compared to the state-of-the-art, and 3) demonstrate our system tracking complex, aggressive, trajectories.
Marc Rigter, Benjamin Morrell, Robert Reid 0001, Gene Merewether, Theodore Tzanetos, Vinay Rajur, K. C. Wong 0001, Larry H. Matthies
IROS1
2018 Differential Flatness Transformations for Aggressive Quadrotor Flight
abstract
Aggressive maneuvering amongst obstacles could enable advanced capabilities for quadrotors in applications such as search and rescue, surveillance, inspection, and situations where rapid flight is required in cluttered environments. Previous works have treated quadrotors as differentially flat systems, and this property has been exploited widely to design simple algorithms that generate dynamically feasible trajectories and to enable hierarchical control. The differentially flat property allows the full state of the quadrotor to be extracted from the reduced dimensional space of x, y, z, yaw and their derivatives. This differential flatness transformation has a number of singularities, however, as well as stability issues when controlling near these singularities. Many methods have been described in the literature to address these; however, they all have limitations when exploring the full flight envelope of a quadrotor, including roll or pitch angles past 90°, and during inverted flight. In this paper, we review these existing methods and then introduce our method, which combines multiple methods to provide a highly-robust differential flatness transformation that addresses most of these issues. Our approach is demonstrated enabling highly-aggressive quadrotor flight in both simulations and real-world experiments.
Benjamin Morrell, Marc Rigter, Gene Merewether, Robert Reid 0001, Rohan Thakker, Theodore Tzanetos, Vinay Rajur, Gregory E. Chamitoff
ICRA2