Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Isabella Pozzi

dblp:226/9634 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 61% Reinforcement learning · 39%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
backpropagation
0.412020
Attention-Gated Brain Propagation: How the brain can implement reward-based error backpropagation · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
biologically plausible learning
0.412020
Attention-Gated Brain Propagation: How the brain can implement reward-based error backpropagation · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
biologically plausible reinforcement learning
0.412020
Attention-Gated Brain Propagation: How the brain can implement reward-based error backpropagation · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning
0.112020
Attention-Gated Brain Propagation: How the brain can implement reward-based error backpropagation · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

credit assignment · 0.4attention-gated feedback · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Attention-Gated Brain Propagation: How the brain can implement reward-based error backpropagation
abstract
Much recent work has focused on biologically plausible variants of supervised learning algorithms. However, there is no teacher in the motor cortex that instructs the motor neurons and learning in the brain depends on reward and punishment. We demonstrate a biologically plausible reinforcement learning scheme for deep networks with an arbitrary number of layers. The network chooses an action by selecting a unit in the output layer and uses feedback connections to assign credit to the units in successively lower layers that are responsible for this action. After the choice, the network receives reinforcement and there is no teacher correcting the errors. We show how the new learning scheme – Attention-Gated Brain Propagation (BrainProp) – is mathematically equivalent to error backpropagation, for one output unit at a time. We demonstrate successful learning of deep fully connected, convolutional and locally connected networks on classical and hard image-classification benchmarks; MNIST, CIFAR10, CIFAR100 and Tiny ImageNet. BrainProp achieves an accuracy that is equivalent to that of standard error-backpropagation, and better than state-of-the-art biologically inspired learning schemes. The trial-and-error nature of learning is associated with limited additional training time so that BrainProp is a factor of 1-3.5 times slower. Our results thereby provide new insights into how deep learning may be implemented in the brain.
Isabella Pozzi, Sander M. Bohté, Pieter R. Roelfsema
NeurIPS1
2018 Gating Sensory Noise in a Spiking Subtractive LSTM
Isabella Pozzi, Roeland Nusselder, Davide Zambrano, Sander M. Bohté
ICANN (1)1