Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
John T. Hwang
dblp:227/0426
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 62% Robot manipulation · 38% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot manipulation › medical robotics
concentric tube robot design |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Generalized Framework for Concentric Tube Robot Design Using Gradient-Based Optimization · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2022 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › design optimization
robot design optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Generalized Framework for Concentric Tube Robot Design Using Gradient-Based Optimization · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2022 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › optimization-based motion planning
gradient-based motion planning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | A Generalized Framework for Concentric Tube Robot Design Using Gradient-Based Optimization · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2022 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | A Generalized Framework for Concentric Tube Robot Design Using Gradient-Based Optimization · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient-based optimization · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | A Generalized Framework for Concentric Tube Robot Design Using Gradient-Based OptimizationabstractConcentric tube robots (CTRs) show particular promise for minimally invasive surgery due to their inherent compliance and ability to navigate in constrained environments. Due to variations in anatomy among patients and variations in task requirements among procedures, it is necessary to customize the design of these robots on a patient- or population-specific basis. However, the complex kinematics and large design space make the design problem challenging. In this article, we propose a computational framework that can efficiently optimize a robot design and a motion plan to enable safe navigation through the patient’s anatomy. The current framework is the first fully gradient-based method for CTR design optimization and motion planning, enabling an efficient and scalable solution for simultaneously optimizing continuous variables, even across multiple anatomies. The framework is demonstrated using two clinical examples, laryngoscopy and heart biopsy, where the optimization problems are solved for a single patient and across multiple patients, respectively. Jui-Te Lin, Cédric Girerd, Jiayao Yan, John T. Hwang, Tania K. Morimoto |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 4 |
| 2018 | A Computational Architecture for Coupling Heterogeneous Numerical Models and Computing Coupled DerivativesabstractOne of the challenges in computational modeling is coupling models to solve multidisciplinary problems. Flow-based computational frameworks alleviate part of the challenge through a modular approach, where data flows from component to component. However, existing flow-based frameworks are inefficient when coupled derivatives are needed for optimization. To address this, we develop the modular analysis and unified derivatives (MAUD) architecture. MAUD formulates the multidisciplinary model as a nonlinear system of equations, which leads to a linear equation that unifies all methods for computing derivatives. This enables flow-based frameworks that use the MAUD architecture to provide a common interface for the chain rule, adjoint method, coupled adjoint method, and hybrid methods; MAUD automatically uses the appropriate method for the problem. A hierarchical, matrix-free approach enables modern solution techniques such as Newton--Krylov solvers to be used within this monolithic formulation without computational overhead. Two demonstration problems are solved using a Python implementation of MAUD: a nanosatellite optimization with more than 2 million unknowns and 25,000 design variables, and an aircraft optimization involving over 6,000 design variables and 23,000 constraints. MAUD is now implemented in the open source framework OpenMDAO, which has been used to solve aircraft, satellite, wind turbine, and turbofan engine design problems. John T. Hwang, Joaquim R. R. A. Martins |
ACM Trans. Math. Softw. | 1 |