Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alfredo Velasco II

dblp:227/1790 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.412020
Look4TRs: a de novo tool for detecting simple tandem repeats using self-supervised hidden Markov models · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › repetitive DNA analysis
microsatellite identification
0.412020
Look4TRs: a de novo tool for detecting simple tandem repeats using self-supervised hidden Markov models · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics
0.412020
Look4TRs: a de novo tool for detecting simple tandem repeats using self-supervised hidden Markov models · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › repeat detection
tandem repeat detection
0.412020
Look4TRs: a de novo tool for detecting simple tandem repeats using self-supervised hidden Markov models · Bioinform. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-supervised hidden markov model · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Look4TRs: a de novo tool for detecting simple tandem repeats using self-supervised hidden Markov models
abstract
MOTIVATION: Simple tandem repeats, microsatellites in particular, have regulatory functions, links to several diseases and applications in biotechnology. There is an immediate need for an accurate tool for detecting microsatellites in newly sequenced genomes. The current available tools are either sensitive or specific but not both; some tools require adjusting parameters manually. RESULTS: We propose Look4TRs, the first application of self-supervised hidden Markov models to discovering microsatellites. Look4TRs adapts itself to the input genomes, balancing high sensitivity and low false positive rate. It auto-calibrates itself. We evaluated Look4TRs on 26 eukaryotic genomes. Based on F measure, which combines sensitivity and false positive rate, Look4TRs outperformed TRF and MISA-the most widely used tools-by 78 and 84%. Look4TRs outperformed the second and the third best tools, MsDetector and Tantan, by 17 and 34%. On eight bacterial genomes, Look4TRs outperformed the second and the third best tools by 27 and 137%. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/TulsaBioinformaticsToolsmith/Look4TRs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Alfredo Velasco II, Benjamin T. James, Vincent D. Wells, Hani Z. Girgis
Bioinform.1
2018 HebbPlot: an intelligent tool for learning and visualizing chromatin mark signatures
abstract
BACKGROUND: Histone modifications play important roles in gene regulation, heredity, imprinting, and many human diseases. The histone code is complex and consists of more than 100 marks. Therefore, biologists need computational tools to characterize general signatures representing the distributions of tens of chromatin marks around thousands of regions. RESULTS: To this end, we developed a software tool, HebbPlot, which utilizes a Hebbian neural network in learning a general chromatin signature from regions with a common function. Hebbian networks can learn the associations between tens of marks and thousands of regions. HebbPlot presents a signature as a digital image, which can be easily interpreted. Moreover, signatures produced by HebbPlot can be compared quantitatively. We validated HebbPlot in six case studies. The results of these case studies are novel or validating results already reported in the literature, indicating the accuracy of HebbPlot. Our results indicate that promoters have a directional chromatin signature; several marks tend to stretch downstream or upstream. H3K4me3 and H3K79me2 have clear directional distributions around active promoters. In addition, the signatures of high- and low-CpG promoters are different; H3K4me3, H3K9ac, and H3K27ac are the most different marks. When we studied the signatures of enhancers active in eight tissues, we observed that these signatures are similar, but not identical. Further, we identified some histone modifications - H3K36me3, H3K79me1, H3K79me2, and H4K8ac - that are associated with coding regions of active genes. Other marks - H4K12ac, H3K14ac, H3K27me3, and H2AK5ac - were found to be weakly associated with coding regions of inactive genes. CONCLUSIONS: This study resulted in a novel software tool, HebbPlot, for learning and visualizing the chromatin signature of a genetic element. Using HebbPlot, we produced a visual catalog of the signatures of multiple genetic elements in 57 cell types available through the Roadmap Epigenomics Project. Furthermore, we made a progress toward a functional catalog consisting of 22 histone marks. In sum, HebbPlot is applicable to a wide array of studies, facilitating the deciphering of the histone code.
Hani Z. Girgis, Alfredo Velasco II, Zachary E. Reyes
BMC Bioinform.2