Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nipun Bayas
dblp:227/2097
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › event analysis › event causality identification
causality detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Causal Explanation Analysis on Social Media · EMNLP 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis
discourse parsing |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Causal Explanation Analysis on Social Media · EMNLP 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
support vector machine · 0.3bidirectional LSTM · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Causal Explanation Analysis on Social MediaabstractUnderstanding causal explanations -reasons given for happenings in one's life -has been found to be an important psychological factor linked to physical and mental health.Causal explanations are often studied through manual identification of phrases over limited samples of personal writing.Automatic identification of causal explanations in social media, while challenging in relying on contextual and sequential cues, offers a larger-scale alternative to expensive manual ratings and opens the door for new applications (e.g.studying prevailing beliefs about causes, such as climate change).Here, we explore automating causal explanation analysis, building on discourse parsing, and presenting two novel subtasks: causality detection (determining whether a causal explanation exists at all) and causal explanation identification (identifying the specific phrase that is the explanation).We achieve strong accuracies for both tasks but find different approaches best: an SVM for causality prediction (F 1 = 0.791) and a hierarchy of Bidirectional LSTMs for causal explanation identification (F 1 = 0.853).Finally, we explore applications of our complete pipeline (F 1 = 0.868), showing demographic differences in mentions of causal explanation and that the association between a word and sentiment can change when it is used within a causal explanation. Youngseo Son, Nipun Bayas, H. Andrew Schwartz |
EMNLP | 2 |