EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matan Haroush
dblp:227/3440
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0009-0005-6587-7959ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 34% Efficient and distributed learning · 22% Trustworthy machine learning · 18% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty and out-of-distribution detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Statistical Framework for Efficient Out of Distribution Detection in Deep Neural Networks · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization › post-training quantization
data-free quantization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The Knowledge Within: Methods for Data-Free Model Compression · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The Knowledge Within: Methods for Data-Free Model Compression · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › synthetic data generation
synthetic sample generation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The Knowledge Within: Methods for Data-Free Model Compression · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
action elimination |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learn What Not to Learn: Action Elimination with Deep Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › deep reinforcement learning
deep q-network |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learn What Not to Learn: Action Elimination with Deep Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learn What Not to Learn: Action Elimination with Deep Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value-based reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learn What Not to Learn: Action Elimination with Deep Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
privacy-preserving machine learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | The Knowledge Within: Methods for Data-Free Model Compression · CVPR 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical testing · 0.6deep neural network · 0.6synthetic data generation · 0.4quantization · 0.4batch normalization statistics · 0.4behavioral cloning · 0.3action elimination network · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | A Statistical Framework for Efficient Out of Distribution Detection in Deep Neural Networks
Matan Haroush, Tzviel Frostig, Ruth Heller, Daniel Soudry |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2020 | The Knowledge Within: Methods for Data-Free Model CompressionabstractBackground: Recently, an extensive amount of research has been focused on compressing and accelerating Deep Neural Networks (DNN). So far, high compression rate algorithms require part of the training dataset for a low precision calibration, or a fine-tuning process. However, this requirement is unacceptable when the data is unavailable or contains sensitive information, as in medical and biometric use-cases. Contributions: We present three methods for generating synthetic samples from trained models. Then, we demonstrate how these samples can be used to calibrate and fine-tune quantized models without using any real data in the process. Our best performing method has a negligible accuracy degradation compared to the original training set. This method, which leverages intrinsic batch normalization layers' statistics of the trained model, can be used to evaluate data similarity. Our approach opens a path towards genuine data-free model compression, alleviating the need for training data during model deployment. Matan Haroush, Itay Hubara, Elad Hoffer, Daniel Soudry |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2018 | Learn What Not to Learn: Action Elimination with Deep Reinforcement LearningabstractLearning how to act when there are many available actions in each state is a challenging task for Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents, especially when many of the actions are redundant or irrelevant. In such cases, it is easier to learn which actions not to take. In this work, we propose the Action-Elimination Deep Q-Network (AE-DQN) architecture that combines a Deep RL algorithm with an Action Elimination Network (AEN) that eliminates sub-optimal actions. The AEN is trained to predict invalid actions, supervised by an external elimination signal provided by the environment. Simulations demonstrate a considerable speedup and added robustness over vanilla DQN in text-based games with over a thousand discrete actions. Tom Zahavy, Matan Haroush, Nadav Merlis, Daniel J. Mankowitz, Shie Mannor |
NeurIPS | 2 |