Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Luc Lehéricy
dblp:227/4112
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 34% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 31% Learning theory · 24% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
hidden markov model |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Identifiability and Consistent Estimation of Nonparametric Translation Hidden Markov Models with General State Space · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 State-by-state Minimax Adaptive Estimation for Nonparametric Hidden Markov Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the convergence of the MLE as an estimator of the learning rate in the Exp3 algorithm · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
maximum likelihood estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the convergence of the MLE as an estimator of the learning rate in the Exp3 algorithm · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the convergence of the MLE as an estimator of the learning rate in the Exp3 algorithm · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › disentangled representation learning
disentanglement |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Disentangling Identifiable Features from Noisy Data with Structured Nonlinear ICA · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › causal representation learning › identifiability
identifiable representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Disentangling Identifiable Features from Noisy Data with Structured Nonlinear ICA · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › blind source separation
independent component analysis |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Disentangling Identifiable Features from Noisy Data with Structured Nonlinear ICA · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › blind source separation › independent component analysis
nonlinear ICA |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Disentangling Identifiable Features from Noisy Data with Structured Nonlinear ICA · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Identifiability and Consistent Estimation of Nonparametric Translation Hidden Markov Models with General State Space · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
nonparametric estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Identifiability and Consistent Estimation of Nonparametric Translation Hidden Markov Models with General State Space · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › hidden markov model
nonparametric HMM |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Identifiability and Consistent Estimation of Nonparametric Translation Hidden Markov Models with General State Space · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Identifiability and Consistent Estimation of Nonparametric Translation Hidden Markov Models with General State Space · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Disentangling Identifiable Features from Noisy Data with Structured Nonlinear ICA · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
polynomial learning rate · 1.3maximum likelihood estimation · 1.3variational maximum likelihood · 0.5structured nonlinear ICA · 0.5weak convergence topology · 0.4nonparametric estimation · 0.4light tail assumptions · 0.4spectral estimator · 0.3least squares estimator · 0.3goldenshluger-lepski methodology · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Model selection for behavioral learning data and applications to contextual banditsabstractLearning for animals or humans is the process that leads to behaviors better adapted to the environment. This process highly depends on the individual that learns and is usually observed only through the individual’s actions. This article presents ways to use this individual behavioral data to find the model that best explains how the individual learns. We propose two model selection methods: a general hold-out procedure and an AIC-type criterion, both adapted to non-stationary dependent data. We provide theoretical error bounds for these methods that are close to those of the standard i.i.d. case. To compare these approaches, we apply them to contextual bandit models and illustrate their use on both synthetic and experimental learning data in a human categorization task. Julien Aubert, Louis Köhler, Luc Lehéricy, Giulia Mezzadri, Patricia Reynaud-Bouret |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2023 | On the convergence of the MLE as an estimator of the learning rate in the Exp3 algorithmabstractWhen fitting the learning data of an individual to algorithm-like learning models, the observations are so dependent and non-stationary that one may wonder what the classical Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE) could do, even if it is the usual tool applied to experimental cognition. Our objective in this work is to show that the estimation of the learning rate cannot be efficient if the learning rate is constant in the classical Exp3 (Exponential weights for Exploration and Exploitation) algorithm. Secondly, we show that if the learning rate decreases polynomially with the sample size, then the prediction error and in some cases the estimation error of the MLE satisfy bounds in probability that decrease at a polynomial rate. Julien Aubert, Luc Lehéricy, Patricia Reynaud-Bouret |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | Disentangling Identifiable Features from Noisy Data with Structured Nonlinear ICAabstractWe introduce a new general identifiable framework for principled disentanglement referred to as Structured Nonlinear Independent Component Analysis (SNICA). Our contribution is to extend the identifiability theory of deep generative models for a very broad class of structured models. While previous works have shown identifiability for specific classes of time-series models, our theorems extend this to more general temporal structures as well as to models with more complex structures such as spatial dependencies. In particular, we establish the major result that identifiability for this framework holds even in the presence of noise of unknown distribution. Finally, as an example of our framework's flexibility, we introduce the first nonlinear ICA model for time-series that combines the following very useful properties: it accounts for both nonstationarity and autocorrelation in a fully unsupervised setting; performs dimensionality reduction; models hidden states; and enables principled estimation and inference by variational maximum-likelihood. Hermanni Hälvä, Sylvain Le Corff, Luc Lehéricy, Jonathan So, Yongjie Zhu, Elisabeth Gassiat, Aapo Hyvärinen |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2020 | Identifiability and Consistent Estimation of Nonparametric Translation Hidden Markov Models with General State SpaceabstractThis paper considers hidden Markov models where the observations are given as the sum of a latent state which lies in a general state space and some independent noise with unknown distribution. It is shown that these fully nonparametric translation models are identifiable with respect to both the distribution of the latent variables and the distribution of the noise, under mostly a light tail assumption on the latent variables. Two nonparametric estimation methods are proposed and we prove that the corresponding estimators are consistent for the weak convergence topology. These results are illustrated with numerical experiments. Elisabeth Gassiat, Sylvain Le Corff, Luc Lehéricy |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2018 | State-by-state Minimax Adaptive Estimation for Nonparametric Hidden Markov ModelsabstractIn this paper, we introduce a new estimator for the emission densities of a nonparametric hidden Markov model. It is adaptive and minimax with respect to each state's regularity–as opposed to globally minimax estimators, which adapt to the worst regularity among the emission densities. Our method is based on Goldenshluger and Lepski's methodology. It is computationally efficient and only requires a family of preliminary estimators, without any restriction on the type of estimators considered. We present two such estimators that allow to reach minimax rates up to a logarithmic term: a spectral estimator and a least squares estimator. We show how to calibrate it in practice and assess its performance on simulations and on real data. Luc Lehéricy |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |