Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Md Imbesat Hassan Rizvi

dblp:227/5139 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-0150-8677ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 36% Language models and text generation · 33% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 12%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning
1.012026
SPARE: Single-Pass Annotation with Reference-Guided Evaluation for Automatic Process Supervision and Reward Modelling · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning
1.012026
SPARE: Single-Pass Annotation with Reference-Guided Evaluation for Automatic Process Supervision and Reward Modelling · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning
1.012026
SPARE: Single-Pass Annotation with Reference-Guided Evaluation for Automatic Process Supervision and Reward Modelling · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
process reward model
1.012026
SPARE: Single-Pass Annotation with Reference-Guided Evaluation for Automatic Process Supervision and Reward Modelling · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
process supervision
1.012026
SPARE: Single-Pass Annotation with Reference-Guided Evaluation for Automatic Process Supervision and Reward Modelling · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
reward modeling
1.012026
SPARE: Single-Pass Annotation with Reference-Guided Evaluation for Automatic Process Supervision and Reward Modelling · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.812024
SpaRC and SpaRP: Spatial Reasoning Characterization and Path Generation for Understanding Spatial Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
spatial reasoning
0.812024
SpaRC and SpaRP: Spatial Reasoning Characterization and Path Generation for Understanding Spatial Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene understanding
spatial relation understanding
0.812024
SpaRC and SpaRP: Spatial Reasoning Characterization and Path Generation for Understanding Spatial Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reference-guided evaluation · 1.0monte carlo tree search · 1.0fine-tuning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 SPARE: Single-Pass Annotation with Reference-Guided Evaluation for Automatic Process Supervision and Reward Modelling
abstract
Process or step-wise supervision has played a crucial role in advancing complex multi-step reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, efficient, high-quality automated process annotation remains a significant challenge. To address this, we introduce Single-Pass Annotation with Reference-Guided Evaluation (SPARE), a novel structured framework that enables efficient per-step annotation by jointly aligning solution steps to reference solutions and determine its accuracy with explicit reasoning in single generation. We demonstrate SPARE's effectiveness across four diverse datasets spanning mathematical reasoning (GSM8K, MATH), multi-hop question answering (MuSiQue-Ans), and spatial reasoning (SpaRP), showing consistent improvements in two applications: (1) training Process Reward Models (PRMs) for ranking and aggregating multiple generations, and (2) fine-tuning models via offline reinforcement learning for greedy decoding. On PROCESSBENCH, SPARE demonstrates data-efficient out-of-distribution generalization, using only ~16% of training samples compared to human-labeled and other synthetically trained baselines. Additionally, it achieves competitive performance with MCTS-based methods while offering 2.3x speedup in terms of total token count. Manual analysis reveals complementary precision-recall characteristics with MCTS approaches, suggesting potential for ensemble methods. These results establish SPARE as a practical and scalable solution for automatic process supervision in LLM reasoning.
Md Imbesat Hassan Rizvi, Xiaodan Zhu 0001, Iryna Gurevych
AAAI1
2024 SpaRC and SpaRP: Spatial Reasoning Characterization and Path Generation for Understanding Spatial Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models
abstract
Spatial reasoning is a crucial component of both biological and artificial intelligence.In this work, we present a comprehensive study of the capability of current state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) on spatial reasoning.To support our study, we created and contribute a novel Spatial Reasoning Characterization (SpaRC) framework and Spatial Reasoning Paths (SpaRP) 1 datasets, to enable an in-depth understanding of the spatial relations and compositions as well as the usefulness of spatial reasoning chains.We found that all the stateof-the-art LLMs do not perform well on the datasets-their performances are consistently low across different setups.The spatial reasoning capability improves substantially as model sizes scale up.Finetuning both large language models (e.g., Llama-2-70B) and smaller ones (e.g., Llama-2-13B) can significantly improve their F1-scores by 7-32 absolute points.We also found that the top proprietary LLMs still significantly outperform their open-source counterparts in topological spatial understanding and reasoning.
Md Imbesat Hassan Rizvi, Xiaodan Zhu 0001, Iryna Gurevych
ACL (1)1
2018 Identifying the Relative Importance of Customer Issues on Product Ratings through Machine Learning
abstract
Millions of customer reviews for products are available online across hundreds of different websites. These reviews have a tremendous influence on the purchase decision of new customers and in creating a positive brand image. Understanding which of the product issues are critical in determining the product ratings is crucial for marketing teams. We have developed a solution which can derive deep insights from customer reviews which goes significantly beyond keyword based analysis. Our solution can identify key customer issues voiced in the reviews and the impact of each of these on the final rating that a customer gives the product. This insight is very actionable as it helps identify which customer concerns are responsible for bad ratings of products.
Himanshu Tiwari, Shameed Sait, Md Imbesat Hassan Rizvi, Niranjan Damera-Venkata
DocEng3