Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mandrita Banerjee

dblp:227/7246 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-2712-4735ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 56% Embedded and real-time systems · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Embedded and real-time systems
cyber-physical system platforms
0.612022
A Hardware-Assisted Heartbeat Mechanism for Fault Identification in Large-Scale IoT Systems · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2022
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › fault diagnosis
fault identification
0.612022
A Hardware-Assisted Heartbeat Mechanism for Fault Identification in Large-Scale IoT Systems · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2022
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault detection
0.212022
A Hardware-Assisted Heartbeat Mechanism for Fault Identification in Large-Scale IoT Systems · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hardware monitoring agent · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 A Hardware-Assisted Heartbeat Mechanism for Fault Identification in Large-Scale IoT Systems
abstract
With increased inter-connectivity among disparate devices, such as Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices, including those deployed in a nation’s critical infrastructure, there is a need to ensure that any failure in the deployed devices can be detected. The capability to automatically detect device failures is particularly crucial in a large-scale, complex IoT system, since it can be very time-consuming and challenging to investigate a large number of geographically-dispersed devices that are also of different makes and types. In this paper, we present a faulty-device identification technique that is designed to achieve lightweight processor-level architectural support. Specifically, a hardware-based monitoring agent is incorporated within a processor and connected to a separate monitoring program when an examination is required. By analyzing information collected by the agent, the monitoring program determines whether the device being monitored is functioning. Findings from our detailed evaluation demonstrate that the proposed approach can detect around 90 percent of the failures with minimal hardware overhead of approximately 5k gates. This area overhead is reasonable and amounts to 7.69 percent of the ARM Cortex-M4 – a lightweight IoT-class processor – that has a total area (excluding optional caches and scratch-pad memory) of 65k gates.
Mandrita Banerjee, Carlo Borges, Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, Junghee Lee 0004, Chrysostomos Nicopoulos
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput.1
2018 Blockchain-Based Security Layer for Identification and Isolation of Malicious Things in IoT: A Conceptual Design
abstract
Internet-of-Things (IoT) is increasingly becoming the norm in both civilian and military settings. In this paper, we present a comprehensive security abstraction layer for IoT systems based on blockchain, which provides us a logical view of a system that comprises trusted devices. The goal of the proposed layer is to detect and isolate untrusted devices. The proposed abstraction layer provides three services, namely: authorization, authentication, and auditing by using blockchain and smart contract-based approaches. We adopt a hardware based approach, where dedicated hardware modules are used to monitor the behavior of the firmware without incurring excessive performance overhead.
Mandrita Banerjee, Junghee Lee 0004, Qian Chen 0019, Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo
ICCCN1