EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Weitao Huang
dblp:227/8372
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-9832-0124ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 48% Information extraction and text analysis · 32% Vision and language · 16% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning |
2.0 | 2 | 2026 | JoPR: Joint Emotion Perception and Reasoning for Conversational Emotion Recognition · ACL (1) 2026 ERCThinker: Fast-Slow Thinking for Emotion Recognition in Conversation · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › emotion recognition
emotion recognition in conversation |
2.0 | 2 | 2026 | JoPR: Joint Emotion Perception and Reasoning for Conversational Emotion Recognition · ACL (1) 2026 ERCThinker: Fast-Slow Thinking for Emotion Recognition in Conversation · ACL (1) 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
affective reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | JoPR: Joint Emotion Perception and Reasoning for Conversational Emotion Recognition · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
fast-slow thinking |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | ERCThinker: Fast-Slow Thinking for Emotion Recognition in Conversation · ACL (1) 2026 |
Software testing
metamorphic testing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | NLPLego: Assembling Test Generation for Natural Language Processing Applications · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2025 |
Software testing
test generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | NLPLego: Assembling Test Generation for Natural Language Processing Applications · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reward design |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | JoPR: Joint Emotion Perception and Reasoning for Conversational Emotion Recognition · ACL (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 1.0large language model · 1.0curriculum learning · 1.0chain-of-thought fine-tuning · 1.0syntax structure analysis · 0.9sentence skeleton and adjunct assembly · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | ERCThinker: Fast-Slow Thinking for Emotion Recognition in ConversationabstractYumeng Fu, Weitao Huang, Junjie Wu, Hao Teng, Shouduo Shang, Meishan Zhang, Bingquan Liu. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Yumeng Fu, Weitao Huang, Junjie Wu 0005, Hao Teng, Shouduo Shang, Meishan Zhang, Bingquan Liu |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2026 | JoPR: Joint Emotion Perception and Reasoning for Conversational Emotion RecognitionabstractEmotion Recognition in Conversation (ERC), the task of identifying the emotion of each utterance in a conversation, is crucial for humanmachine interaction.Existing LLM-based ERC methods focus on standard prompting and slow thinking for emotion analysis.However, they suffer from the lack of human-like emotion reasoning and discrimination between similar emotions, thus limiting accurate emotion predictions.To this end, we present JoPR, jointing perception-curriculum learning and emotional reasoning for conversational emotion recognition.Specifically, we devise a multi-dimension curriculum with long CoT fine-tuning to clone human-like emotion reasoning.We further design an emotion-specific reward function in a novel reinforcement learning framework, thereby enhancing the discernment between similar emotions.We conduct extensive experiments on three widely used benchmark datasets, and the results demonstrate that our JoPR achieves consistent and significant improvements over baselines. Yumeng Fu, Weitao Huang, Junjie Wu 0005, Hao Teng, Meishan Zhang, Bingquan Liu |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2026 | Diffusion-enhanced intrusion detection method for imbalanced network traffic
Yaoqi Si, Hongpeng Tian, Youhao Li, Weitao Huang |
Comput. Networks | 5 |
| 2025 | LogCTBL: a hybrid deep learning model for log-based anomaly detection
Wengang Luo, Yinghang Zhou, Weitao Huang |
J. Supercomput. | 5 |
| 2025 | NLPLego: Assembling Test Generation for Natural Language Processing ApplicationsabstractWith the development of Deep Learning, Natural Language Processing (NLP) applications have reached or even exceeded human-level capabilities in certain tasks. Although NLP applications have shown good performance, they can still have bugs like traditional software and even lead to serious consequences. Inspired by Lego blocks and syntax structure analysis, we propose an assembling test generation method for NLP applications or models and implement it in NLPLego . The key idea of NLPLego is to assemble the sentence skeleton and adjuncts in order by simulating the building of Lego blocks to generate multiple grammatically and semantically correct sentences based on one seed sentence. The sentences generated by NLPLego have derivation relations and different degrees of variation. These characteristics make it well-suited for integration with metamorphic testing theory, addressing the challenge of test oracle absence in NLP application testing. To validate NLPLego , we conduct experiments on three commonly used NLP tasks (i.e., machine reading comprehension, sentiment analysis, and semantic similarity measures), focusing on the efficiency of test generation and the quality and effectiveness of generated tests. We select five advanced NLP models and one popular industrial NLP software as the tested subjects. Given seed tests from SQuAD 2.0, SST, and QQP, NLPLego successfully detects 1,732, 3,140, and 261,879 incorrect behaviors with around 93.1% precision in three tasks, respectively. The experiment results show that NLPLego can efficiently generate high-quality tests for multiple NLP tasks to detect erroneous behaviors effectively. In the case study, we analyze the testing results provided by NLPLego to obtain intuitive representations of the different NLP capabilities of the tested subjects. The case study confirms that NLPLego can provide developers with clarity on the direction to improve NLP models or applications, laying the foundation for enhancing performance. Pin Ji, Yang Feng 0003, Ruohao Zhang, Ruichen Xue, Weitao Huang, Jia Liu 0015 |
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. | 6 |