Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aditya Bhatt 0001
dblp:228/0170-1
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 67% Deep learning architectures and training · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › normalization
batch normalization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CrossQ: Batch Normalization in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Greater Sample Efficiency and Simplicity · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CrossQ: Batch Normalization in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Greater Sample Efficiency and Simplicity · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
sample efficiency |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CrossQ: Batch Normalization in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Greater Sample Efficiency and Simplicity · ICLR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
target networks · 0.8batch normalization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | CrossQ: Batch Normalization in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Greater Sample Efficiency and SimplicityabstractSample efficiency is a crucial problem in deep reinforcement learning. Recent algorithms, such as REDQ and DroQ, found a way to improve the sample efficiency by increasing the update-to-data (UTD) ratio to 20 gradient update steps on the critic per environment sample.
However, this comes at the expense of a greatly increased computational cost. To reduce this computational burden, we introduce CrossQ:
A lightweight algorithm for continuous control tasks that makes careful use of Batch Normalization and removes target networks to surpass the current state-of-the-art in sample efficiency while maintaining a low UTD ratio of 1. Notably, CrossQ does not rely on advanced bias-reduction schemes used in current methods. CrossQ's contributions are threefold: (1) it matches or surpasses current state-of-the-art methods in terms of sample efficiency, (2) it substantially reduces the computational cost compared to REDQ and DroQ, (3) it is easy to implement, requiring just a few lines of code on top of SAC. Aditya Bhatt 0001, Daniel Palenicek, Boris Belousov, Max Argus, Artemij Amiranashvili, Thomas Brox, Jan Peters 0001 |
ICLR | 1 |