High-level synthesis (HLS) is a process that automatically translates a software program in a high-level language into a low-level hardware description. However, the hardware designs produced by HLS tools still suffer from a significant performance gap compared to manual implementations. This is because the input HLS programs must still be written using hardware design principles.

The rise of data-intensive applications exposed the limitations of conventional processor-centric von-Neumann architectures that struggle to meet the off-chip memory bandwidth demand. Therefore, recent innovations in computer architecture advocate compute-in-memory (CIM) and compute-near-memory (CNM), non-von-Neumann paradigms achieving orders-of-magnitude improvements in performance and energy consumption. Despite significant technological breakthroughs in the last few years, the programmability of these systems is still a serious challenge. Their programming models are too low-level and specific to particular system implementations. Since such future architectures are predicted to be highly heterogeneous, developing novel compiler abstractions and frameworks becomes necessary. To this end, we present CINM (Cinnamon), a first end-to-end compilation flow that leverages the hierarchical abstractions to generalize over different CIM and CNM devices and enable device-agnostic and device-aware optimizations. Cinnamon progressively lowers input programs and performs optimizations at each level in the lowering pipeline. To show its efficacy, we evaluate CINM on a set of benchmarks for a real CNM system (UPMEM) and the memristors-based CIM accelerators. We show that Cinnamon, supporting multiple hardware targets, generates high-performance code comparable to or better than state-of-the-art implementations.

Memristive devices promise an alternative approach toward non-Von Neumann architectures, where specific computational tasks are performed within the memory devices. In the machine learning (ML) domain, crossbar arrays of resistive devices have shown great promise for ML inference, as they allow for hardware acceleration of matrix multiplications. But, to enable widespread adoption of these novel architectures, it is critical to have an automatic compilation flow as opposed to relying on a manual mapping of specific kernels on the crossbar arrays. We demonstrate the programmability of memristor-based accelerators using the new compiler design principle of multilevel rewriting, where a hierarchy of abstractions lowers programs level-by-level and perform code transformations at the most suitable abstraction. In particular, we develop a prototype compiler, which progressively lowers a mathematical notation for tensor operations arising in ML workloads, to fixed-function memristor-based hardware blocks.

We present Polygeist, a new compilation flow that connects the MLIR compiler infrastructure to cutting edge polyhedral optimization tools. It consists of a C and C++ frontend capable of converting a broad range of existing codes into MLIR suitable for polyhedral transformation and a bi-directional conversion between MLIR and OpenScop exchange format. The Polygeist/MLIR intermediate representation featuring high-level (affine) loop constructs and n-D arrays embedded into a single static assignment (SSA) substrate enables an unprecedented combination of SSA-based and polyhedral optimizations. We illustrate this by proposing and implementing two extra transformations: statement splitting and reduction parallelization. Our evaluation demonstrates that Polygeist outperforms on average both an LLVM IR-level optimizer (Polly) and a source-to-source state-of-the-art polyhedral compiler (Pluto) when exercised on the Polybench/C benchmark suite in sequential (2.53x vs 1.41x, 2.34x) and parallel mode (9.47x vs 3.26x, 7.54x) thanks to the new representation and transformations.

Multi-level intermediate representations (IR) show great promise for lowering the design costs for domain-specific compilers by providing a reusable, extensible, and non-opini-onated framework for expressing domain-specific and high-level abstractions directly in the IR. But, while such frameworks support the progressive lowering of high-level representations to low-level IR, they do not raise in the opposite direction. Thus, the entry point into the compilation pipeline defines the highest level of abstraction for all subsequent transformations, limiting the set of applicable optimizations, in particular for general-purpose languages that are not semantically rich enough to model the required abstractions. We propose Progressive Raising, a complementary approach to the progressive lowering in multi-level IRs that raises from lower to higher-level abstractions to leverage domain-specific transformations for low-level representations. We further introduce Multilevel Tactics, our declarative approach for progressive raising, implemented on top of the MLIR framework, and demonstrate the progressive raising from affine loop nests specified in a general-purpose language to high-level linear algebra operations. Our raising paths leverage subsequent high-level domain-specific transformations with significant performance improvements.

Despite years of research, the optimization strategy of loop-level optimization frameworks remains fragile when addressing modern and heterogeneous architectures. Furthermore, optimizers act as an opaque operation, a black-box, to the users, forcing them to tedious an error-prone manual optimization if imprecise cost models are used. Current solutions, to drive loop-level optimizers rely on pragmas or bake the transformations recipes in the source code using imperative embedded scripting. But, the optimization of programs via a sequence of imperative directives is unlikely to solve this problem fully as expressing optimization is still an error-prone and time-consuming task for the users. The ideal solution would be a declarative approach that allows the users to opt-in if the optimizer has made a poor optimization decision but avoid baking the transformation script within a given application or bind it to a particular loop nest. Based on such an idea, we propose LoopOpt, an interactive tool that enables users to design optimizations in partnership with the compiler in a declarative way. Thus, our approach opens the polyhedral black-box allowing users to design complex optimizations sequences in a declarative way.

To this day, polyhedral optimizing compilers use either extremely rigid (but accurate) cost models, one-size-fits-all general-purpose heuristics, or auto-tuning strategies to traverse and evaluate large optimization spaces. In this paper, we introduce an adaptive and automatic scheduler that permits to generate novel loop transformation sequences (or recipes) capable of delivering strong performance for a variety of different architectures without relying on auto-tuning, nor on pre-determined transformation strategies. We evaluate our approach using the Polybench/C benchmark suite against two modern state-of-the-art optimizers on three different architectures: An AMD ThreadRipper, an Intel Xeon Phi, and an Intel Xeon Platinum. Our results provide evidence that a set of high-level objectives backed up by an automatic adaptive scheduler (i.e., not hard-wired) is capable of achieving competitive performance, while only resorting to evaluating a handful of tuned variants.

Computation in-memory is a promising non-von Neumann approach aiming at completely diminishing the data transfer to and from the memory subsystem. Although a lot of architectures have been proposed, compiler support for such architectures is still lagging behind. In this paper, we close this gap by proposing an end-to-end compilation flow for in-memory computing based on the LLVM compiler infrastructure. Starting from sequential code, our approach automatically detects, opti-mizes, and offloads kernels suitable for in-memory acceleration. We demonstrate our compiler tool-flow on the PolyBench/C benchmark suite and evaluate the benefits of our proposed in-memory architecture simulated in Gem5 by comparing it with a state-of-the-art von Neumann architecture.

We present PET-to-MLIR, a new tool to enter the MLIR compiler framework from C source. The tool is based on the popular PET and ISL libraries for extracting and manipulating quasi-affine sets and relations, and Loop Tactics, a declarative optimizer. The use of PET brings advanced diagnosis and full support for C by relying on the Clang parser. ISL allows easy manipulation of the polyhedral representation and efficient code generation. Loop Tactics, on the other hand, enable us to detect computational motifs transparently and lift the entry point in MLIR, thus enabling domain-specific optimizations in general-purpose code.We demonstrate our tool using the Polybench/C benchmark suite and show that it can lower most of the benchmarks to the MLIR's affine dialect successfully. We believe that our tool can benefit research in the compiler community by providing an automatic way to translate C code to the MLIR affine dialect.

Increasingly complex hardware makes the design of effective compilers difficult. To reduce this problem, we introduce Declarative Loop Tactics , which is a novel framework of composable program transformations based on an internal tree-like program representation of a polyhedral compiler. The framework is based on a declarative C++ API built around easy-to-program matchers and builders, which provide the foundation to develop loop optimization strategies. Using our matchers and builders, we express computational patterns and core building blocks, such as loop tiling, fusion, and data-layout transformations, and compose them into algorithm-specific optimizations. Declarative Loop Tactics (Loop Tactics for short) can be applied to many domains. For two of them, stencils and linear algebra, we show how developers can express sophisticated domain-specific optimizations as a set of composable transformations or calls to optimized libraries. By allowing developers to add highly customized optimizations for a given computational pattern, we expect our approach to reduce the need for DSLs and to extend the range of optimizations that can be performed by a current general-purpose compiler.

Application and technology trends are increasingly forcing computer systems to be designed for specific workloads and application domains. Although memory is one of the key components impacting the performance and power consumption of state-of-art computer systems, its operation typically cannot be adapted to workload characteristics beyond some limited controller configuration options. In this paper, we present a novel near-memory acceleration platform based on an Access Processor that enables the main memory system operation to be programmed and adapted dynamically to the accelerated workload. The platform targets both ASIC and FPGA implementations integrated within IBM POWER systems. We show how this platform can be applied to accelerate stencil processing.

The conventional approach of moving stored data to the CPU for computation has become a major performance bottleneck for emerging scale-out data-intensive applications due to their limited data reuse. At the same time, the advancement in integration technologies have made the decade-old concept of coupling compute units close to the memory (called Near-Memory Computing) more viable. Processing right at the "home" of data can completely diminish the data movement problem of data-intensive applications. This paper focuses on analyzing and organizing the extensive body of literature on near-memory computing across various dimensions: starting from the memory level where this paradigm is applied, to the granularity of the application that could be executed on the near-memory units. We highlight the challenges as well as the critical need of evaluation methodologies that can be employed in designing these special architectures. Using a case study, we present our methodology and also identify topics for future research to unlock the full potential of near-memory computing.