Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andriy Mulyar
dblp:228/2733
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 67% Information extraction and text analysis · 33% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Debugging and program repair · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval
code search |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CoRNStack: High-Quality Contrastive Data for Better Code Retrieval and Reranking · ICLR 2025 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CoRNStack: High-Quality Contrastive Data for Better Code Retrieval and Reranking · ICLR 2025 |
Information retrieval
reranking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CoRNStack: High-Quality Contrastive Data for Better Code Retrieval and Reranking · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
entity linking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Clinical Concept Linking with Contextualized Neural Representations · ACL 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › ontology › domain ontology
medical ontology |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Clinical Concept Linking with Contextualized Neural Representations · ACL 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Clinical Concept Linking with Contextualized Neural Representations · ACL 2020 |
Debugging and program repair › fault localization
bug localization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | CoRNStack: High-Quality Contrastive Data for Better Code Retrieval and Reranking · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hard negative mining · 1.7contrastive learning · 1.7pre-training with synonyms · 0.4neural ranking · 0.4contextualized neural representations · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | CoRNStack: High-Quality Contrastive Data for Better Code Retrieval and RerankingabstractEffective code retrieval plays a crucial role in advancing code generation, bug fixing, and software maintenance, particularly as software systems increase in complexity. While current code embedding models have demonstrated promise in retrieving code snippets for small-scale, well-defined tasks, they often underperform in more demanding real-world applications such as bug localization within GitHub repositories. We hypothesize that a key issue is their reliance on noisy and inconsistent datasets for training, which impedes their ability to generalize to more complex retrieval scenarios. To address these limitations, we introduce CoRNStack, a large-scale, high-quality contrastive training dataset for code that spans multiple programming languages. This dataset is curated using consistency filtering to eliminate noisy positives and is further enriched with mined hard negatives, thereby facilitating more effective learning. We demonstrate that contrastive training of embedding models using CoRNStack leads to state-of-the-art performance across a variety of code retrieval tasks. Furthermore, the dataset can be leveraged for training code reranking models, a largely underexplored area compared to text reranking. Our finetuned code reranking model significantly improves the ranking quality over the retrieved results. Finally, by employing our code retriever and reranker together, we demonstrate significant improvements in function localization for GitHub issues, an important
component of real-world software development. Tarun Suresh, Revanth Gangi Reddy, Zach Nussbaum, Andriy Mulyar, Brandon Duderstadt, Heng Ji 0001 |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2022 | Extracting experimental parameter entities from scientific articles
Steele Farnsworth, Gabrielle Gurdin, Jorge Vargas, Andriy Mulyar, Nastassja Lewinski, Bridget T. McInnes |
J. Biomed. Informatics | 4 |
| 2021 | MT-clinical BERT: scaling clinical information extraction with multitask learningabstractOBJECTIVE: Clinical notes contain an abundance of important, but not-readily accessible, information about patients. Systems that automatically extract this information rely on large amounts of training data of which there exists limited resources to create. Furthermore, they are developed disjointly, meaning that no information can be shared among task-specific systems. This bottleneck unnecessarily complicates practical application, reduces the performance capabilities of each individual solution, and associates the engineering debt of managing multiple information extraction systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We address these challenges by developing Multitask-Clinical BERT: a single deep learning model that simultaneously performs 8 clinical tasks spanning entity extraction, personal health information identification, language entailment, and similarity by sharing representations among tasks. RESULTS: We compare the performance of our multitasking information extraction system to state-of-the-art BERT sequential fine-tuning baselines. We observe a slight but consistent performance degradation in MT-Clinical BERT relative to sequential fine-tuning. DISCUSSION: These results intuitively suggest that learning a general clinical text representation capable of supporting multiple tasks has the downside of losing the ability to exploit dataset or clinical note-specific properties when compared to a single, task-specific model. CONCLUSIONS: We find our single system performs competitively with all state-the-art task-specific systems while also benefiting from massive computational benefits at inference. Andriy Mulyar, Özlem Uzuner, Bridget T. McInnes |
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc. | 1 |
| 2020 | Clinical Concept Linking with Contextualized Neural RepresentationsabstractIn traditional approaches to entity linking, linking decisions are based on three sources of information -the similarity of the mention string to an entity's name, the similarity of the context of the document to the entity, and broader information about the knowledge base (KB).In some domains, there is little contextual information present in the KB and thus we rely more heavily on mention string similarity.We consider one example of this, concept linking, which seeks to link mentions of medical concepts to a medical concept ontology.We propose an approach to concept linking that leverages recent work in contextualized neural models, such as ELMo (Peters et al., 2018), which create a token representation that integrates the surrounding context of the mention and concept name.We find a neural ranking approach paired with contextualized embeddings provides gains over a competitive baseline (Leaman et al., 2013).Additionally, we find that a pre-training step using synonyms from the ontology offers a useful initialization for the ranker. Elliot Schumacher, Andriy Mulyar, Mark Dredze |
ACL | 2 |
| 2018 | Addressing Local Class Imbalance in Balanced Datasets with Dynamic Impurity Decision Trees
Andriy Mulyar, Bartosz Krawczyk |
DS | 1 |