Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rémi Cardon

dblp:228/4819 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
6as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-7858-3504ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 first-author · 4 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 36% Trustworthy machine learning · 28% Language models and text generation · 28%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
automatic text simplification evaluation
0.612022
Linguistic Corpus Annotation for Automatic Text Simplification Evaluation · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.612022
Is Attention Explanation? An Introduction to the Debate · ACL (1) 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
text simplification
0.612022
Linguistic Corpus Annotation for Automatic Text Simplification Evaluation · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism
0.212022
Is Attention Explanation? An Introduction to the Debate · ACL (1) 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › data annotation
corpus annotation
0.212022
Linguistic Corpus Annotation for Automatic Text Simplification Evaluation · EMNLP 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

corpus annotation · 0.6attention analysis · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 GenAI for Cognitive Accessibility: Plain Language
Rémi Cardon, Virginia Francisco
ICCHP (1)1
2026 Automated Essay Scoring and Language Certification: Assessing Generalizability, Agreement and Validity for French
abstract
Abstract In Automated Essay Scoring (AES), benchmarking practices have fostered minimalist evaluation practices, in contrast with the broader-view recommendations of evaluation frameworks, such as the argument-based validation framework (ABV), which argued in favor of a multidimensional assessment of systems, especially in the context of high-stakes language tests. In this paper, we introduce an enhanced and more practical version of the ABV framework, incorporating fairness analysis, correlations with linguistic features, prediction error evaluation, and model agreement compared with human raters. Applying this framework to French AES, we compare 8 model architectures on a corpus of 27k exam essays (2 raters each) and a generalization corpus of 961 essays (at least nine raters each). Our analyses illustrate the benefits of applying the ABV framework to better understand the capabilities and pitfalls of AES models, while also advancing the state-of-the-art for French AES.
Rodrigo Wilkens, Rémi Cardon, Vincent Folny, Thomas François
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics2
2024 Contribution of Move Structure to Automatic Genre Identification: An Annotated Corpus of French Tourism Websites
abstract
The present work studies the contribution of move structure to automatic genre identification. This concept - well known in other branches of genre analysis - seems to have little application in natural language processing. We describe how we collect a corpus of websites in French related to tourism and annotate it with move structure. We conduct experiments on automatic genre identification with our corpus. Our results show that our approach for informing a model with move structure can increase its performance for automatic genre identification, and reduce the need for annotated data and computational power.
Rémi Cardon, Trang Tran Hanh Pham, Julien Zakhia Doueihi, Thomas François
LREC/COLING1
2022 Is Attention Explanation? An Introduction to the Debate
abstract
Adrien Bibal, Rémi Cardon, David Alfter, Rodrigo Wilkens, Xiaoou Wang, Thomas François, Patrick Watrin. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2022.
Adrien Bibal, Rémi Cardon, David Alfter, Rodrigo Wilkens, Xiaoou Wang, Thomas François, Patrick Watrin
ACL (1)2
2022 Linguistic Corpus Annotation for Automatic Text Simplification Evaluation
abstract
Rémi Cardon, Adrien Bibal, Rodrigo Wilkens, David Alfter, Magali Norré, Adeline Müller, Watrin Patrick, Thomas François. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2022.
Rémi Cardon, Adrien Bibal, Rodrigo Wilkens, David Alfter, Magali Norré, Adeline Müller, Patrick Watrin, Thomas François
EMNLP1
2020 French Biomedical Text Simplification: When Small and Precise Helps
abstract
We present experiments on biomedical text simplification in French.We use two kinds of corpora -parallel sentences extracted from existing health comparable corpora in French and WikiLarge corpus translated from English to French -and a lexicon that associates medical terms with paraphrases.Then, we train neural models on these parallel corpora using different ratios of general and specialized sentences.We evaluate the results with BLEU, SARI and Kandel scores.The results point out that little specialized data helps significantly the simplification.
Rémi Cardon, Natalia Grabar
COLING1
2020 A French Corpus for Semantic Similarity
abstract
Semantic similarity is an area of Natural Language Processing that is useful for several downstream applications, such as machine translation, natural language generation, information retrieval, or question answering. The task consists in assessing the extent to which two sentences express or do not express the same meaning. To do so, corpora with graded pairs of sentences are required. The grade is positioned on a given scale, usually going from 0 (completely unrelated) to 5 (equivalent semantics). In this work, we introduce such a corpus for French, the first that we know of. It is comprised of 1,010 sentence pairs with grades from five annotators. We describe the annotation process, analyse these data, and perform a few experiments for the automatic grading of semantic similarity.
Rémi Cardon, Natalia Grabar
LREC1
2019 Automatic Detection of Parallel Sentences from Comparable Biomedical Texts
Rémi Cardon, Natalia Grabar
CICLing (1)1