Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Friedrich Kurz

dblp:228/5055 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
classical planning
0.712023
Formally Verified SAT-Based AI Planning · AAAI 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › classical planning
SAT-based planning
0.712023
Formally Verified SAT-Based AI Planning · AAAI 2023
Automated reasoning and model checking › theorem proving
interactive theorem proving
0.712023
Formally Verified SAT-Based AI Planning · AAAI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

formal verification · 1.3SAT encoding · 1.3Isabelle/HOL · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Formally Verified SAT-Based AI Planning
abstract
We present an executable formally verified SAT encoding of ground classical AI planning problems. We use the theorem prover Isabelle/HOL to perform the verification. We experimentally test the verified encoding and show that it can be used for reasonably sized standard planning benchmarks. We also use it as a reference to test a state-of-the-art SAT-based planner, showing that it sometimes falsely claims that problems have no solutions of certain lengths.
Mohammad Abdulaziz, Friedrich Kurz
AAAI2