Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Varun Mangalick
dblp:228/5204
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Three Operator Splitting with a Nonconvex Loss Function · ICML 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
operator splitting |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Three Operator Splitting with a Nonconvex Loss Function · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic gradient · 0.5operator splitting · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Three Operator Splitting with a Nonconvex Loss FunctionabstractWe consider the problem of minimizing the sum of three functions, one of which is nonconvex but differentiable, and the other two are convex but possibly nondifferentiable. We investigate the Three Operator Splitting method (TOS) of Davis & Yin (2017) with an aim to extend its theoretical guarantees for this nonconvex problem template. In particular, we prove convergence of TOS with nonasymptotic bounds on its nonstationarity and infeasibility errors. In contrast with the existing work on nonconvex TOS, our guarantees do not require additional smoothness assumptions on the terms comprising the objective; hence they cover instances of particular interest where the nondifferentiable terms are indicator functions. We also extend our results to a stochastic setting where we have access only to an unbiased estimator of the gradient. Finally, we illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method through numerical experiments on quadratic assignment problems. Alp Yurtsever, Varun Mangalick, Suvrit Sra |
ICML | 2 |