Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lyubov R. Lonishin

dblp:228/5256 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › gene-gene interaction
epistasis
0.412020
HypercubeME: two hundred million combinatorially complete datasets from a single experiment · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › gene-gene interaction
higher-order epistasis detection
0.412020
HypercubeME: two hundred million combinatorially complete datasets from a single experiment · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural biology › protein structure and function › protein stability prediction
mutation-induced stability change
0.312018
Self-consistency test reveals systematic bias in programs for prediction change of stability upon mutation · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural biology › protein structure and function
protein stability prediction
0.312018
Self-consistency test reveals systematic bias in programs for prediction change of stability upon mutation · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
protein structure
0.112018
Self-consistency test reveals systematic bias in programs for prediction change of stability upon mutation · Bioinform. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

recursive algorithm · 0.4self-consistency test · 0.3molecular relaxation · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 HypercubeME: two hundred million combinatorially complete datasets from a single experiment
abstract
MOTIVATION: Epistasis, the context-dependence of the contribution of an amino acid substitution to fitness, is common in evolution. To detect epistasis, fitness must be measured for at least four genotypes: the reference genotype, two different single mutants and a double mutant with both of the single mutations. For higher-order epistasis of the order n, fitness has to be measured for all 2n genotypes of an n-dimensional hypercube in genotype space forming a "combinatorially complete dataset". So far, only a handful of such datasets have been produced by manual curation. Concurrently, random mutagenesis experiments have produced measurements of fitness and other phenotypes in a high-throughput manner, potentially containing a number of combinatorially complete datasets. RESULTS: We present an effective recursive algorithm for finding all hypercube structures in random mutagenesis experimental data. To test the algorithm, we applied it to the data from a recent HIS3 protein dataset and found all 199,847,053 unique combinatorially complete genotype combinations of dimensionality ranging from two to twelve. The algorithm may be useful for researchers looking for higher-order epistasis in their high-throughput experimental data. AVAILABILITY: https://github.com/ivankovlab/HypercubeME.git. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Laura Aviñó-Esteban, Lyubov R. Lonishin, Daniil M. Bobrovskiy, Gregory Leleytner, Natalya S. Bogatyreva, Fyodor A. Kondrashov, Dmitry N. Ivankov
Bioinform.2
2018 Self-consistency test reveals systematic bias in programs for prediction change of stability upon mutation
abstract
Motivation: Computational prediction of the effect of mutations on protein stability is used by researchers in many fields. The utility of the prediction methods is affected by their accuracy and bias. Bias, a systematic shift of the predicted change of stability, has been noted as an issue for several methods, but has not been investigated systematically. Presence of the bias may lead to misleading results especially when exploring the effects of combination of different mutations. Results: Here we use a protocol to measure the bias as a function of the number of introduced mutations. It is based on a self-consistency test of the reciprocity the effect of a mutation. An advantage of the used approach is that it relies solely on crystal structures without experimentally measured stability values. We applied the protocol to four popular algorithms predicting change of protein stability upon mutation, FoldX, Eris, Rosetta and I-Mutant, and found an inherent bias. For one program, FoldX, we manage to substantially reduce the bias using additional relaxation by Modeller. Authors using algorithms for predicting effects of mutations should be aware of the bias described here. Availability and implementation: All calculations were implemented by in-house PERL scripts. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Note: The article 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty348, published alongside this paper, also addresses the problem of biases in protein stability change predictions.
Dinara R. Usmanova, Natalya S. Bogatyreva, Joan Ariño Bernad, Aleksandra A. Eremina, Anastasiya A. Gorshkova, German M. Kanevskiy, Lyubov R. Lonishin, Alexander V. Meister, Alisa G. Yakupova, Fyodor A. Kondrashov, Dmitry N. Ivankov
Bioinform.7