Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stefano Nembrini

dblp:228/5324 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
random forest variable importance
1.132019
On what to permute in test-based approaches for variable importance measures in Random Forests · Bioinform. 2019
Bias in the intervention in prediction measure in random forests: illustrations and recommendations · Bioinform. 2019
The revival of the Gini importance? · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics
1.132019
On what to permute in test-based approaches for variable importance measures in Random Forests · Bioinform. 2019
Bias in the intervention in prediction measure in random forests: illustrations and recommendations · Bioinform. 2019
The revival of the Gini importance? · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.112018
The revival of the Gini importance? · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome-wide association study
0.112018
The revival of the Gini importance? · Bioinform. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random forest · 1.1permutation testing · 0.7permutation importance · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Bias in the intervention in prediction measure in random forests: illustrations and recommendations
abstract
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Stefano Nembrini
Bioinform.1
2019 On what to permute in test-based approaches for variable importance measures in Random Forests
abstract
MOTIVATION: In bioinformatics applications, it is currently customary to permute the outcome variable in order to produce inference on covariates to test novel methods or statistics whose distributions are poorly known. The seminal publication of Altmann et al. in Bioinformatics uses the same permutation scheme to obtain P-values that can be treated as corrected measure of feature importance to rectify the bias of the Gini variable importance in Random Forests. Since then, such method has been used in applied work to also draw statistical conclusions on variable importance measures from resulting P-values. RESULTS: In this paper, we show that permuting the outcome may produce unexpected results, including P-values with undesirable properties and illustrate how more refined permutation schemes can be appropriate to obtain desirable results, including high power in discovering relevant variables. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Stefano Nembrini
Bioinform.1
2018 The revival of the Gini importance?
abstract
Motivation: Random forests are fast, flexible and represent a robust approach to analyze high dimensional data. A key advantage over alternative machine learning algorithms are variable importance measures, which can be used to identify relevant features or perform variable selection. Measures based on the impurity reduction of splits, such as the Gini importance, are popular because they are simple and fast to compute. However, they are biased in favor of variables with many possible split points and high minor allele frequency. Results: We set up a fast approach to debias impurity-based variable importance measures for classification, regression and survival forests. We show that it creates a variable importance measure which is unbiased with regard to the number of categories and minor allele frequency and almost as fast as the standard impurity importance. As a result, it is now possible to compute reliable importance estimates without the extra computing cost of permutations. Further, we combine the importance measure with a fast testing procedure, producing p-values for variable importance with almost no computational overhead to the creation of the random forest. Applications to gene expression and genome-wide association data show that the proposed method is powerful and computationally efficient. Availability and implementation: The procedure is included in the ranger package, available at https://cran.r-project.org/package=ranger and https://github.com/imbs-hl/ranger. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Stefano Nembrini, Inke R. König, Marvin N. Wright
Bioinform.1