Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christopher Brix

dblp:228/5443 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 53% Efficient and distributed learning · 35% Machine translation · 12%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 67% Digital forensics and information hiding · 33%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial robustness
0.912025
CertPHash: Towards Certified Perceptual Hashing via Robust Training · USENIX Security Symposium 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial robustness
certified robustness
0.912025
CertPHash: Towards Certified Perceptual Hashing via Robust Training · USENIX Security Symposium 2025
Digital forensics and information hiding
perceptual hashing
0.912025
CertPHash: Towards Certified Perceptual Hashing via Robust Training · USENIX Security Symposium 2025
Program verification › neural network verification
bound propagation
0.812024
Scalable Neural Network Verification with Branch-and-bound Inferred Cutting Planes · NeurIPS 2024
Program verification › neural network verification
branch-and-bound verification
0.812024
Scalable Neural Network Verification with Branch-and-bound Inferred Cutting Planes · NeurIPS 2024
Program verification
neural network verification
0.812024
Scalable Neural Network Verification with Branch-and-bound Inferred Cutting Planes · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.712023
Provably Bounding Neural Network Preimages · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
neural network verification
0.712023
Provably Bounding Neural Network Preimages · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.712023
Provably Bounding Neural Network Preimages · NeurIPS 2023
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation
0.522020
Towards Two-Dimensional Sequence to Sequence Model in Neural Machine Translation · EMNLP 2018
Successfully Applying the Stabilized Lottery Ticket Hypothesis to the Transformer Architecture · ACL 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparse training
lottery ticket hypothesis
0.412020
Successfully Applying the Stabilized Lottery Ticket Hypothesis to the Transformer Architecture · ACL 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.412020
Successfully Applying the Stabilized Lottery Ticket Hypothesis to the Transformer Architecture · ACL 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning
0.412020
Successfully Applying the Stabilized Lottery Ticket Hypothesis to the Transformer Architecture · ACL 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

robust training · 0.9multi-tree search · 0.8mixed-integer programming · 0.8constraint strengthening · 0.8linear programming · 0.7branch-and-bound · 0.7GPU acceleration · 0.7stabilized lottery ticket pruning · 0.4magnitude pruning · 0.4multi-dimensional LSTM · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 CertPHash: Towards Certified Perceptual Hashing via Robust Training
Yuchen Yang 0001, Qichang Liu, Christopher Brix, Huan Zhang 0001, Yinzhi Cao
USENIX Security Symposium3
2024 Scalable Neural Network Verification with Branch-and-bound Inferred Cutting Planes
abstract
Recently, cutting-plane methods such as GCP-CROWN have been explored to enhance neural network verifiers and made significant advancements. However, GCP-CROWN currently relies on ${\it generic}$ cutting planes ("cuts") generated from external mixed integer programming (MIP) solvers. Due to the poor scalability of MIP solvers, large neural networks cannot benefit from these cutting planes. In this paper, we exploit the structure of the neural network verification problem to generate efficient and scalable cutting planes ${\it specific}$ to this problem setting. We propose a novel approach, Branch-and-bound Inferred Cuts with COnstraint Strengthening (BICCOS), that leverages the logical relationships of neurons within verified subproblems in the branch-and-bound search tree, and we introduce cuts that preclude these relationships in other subproblems. We develop a mechanism that assigns influence scores to neurons in each path to allow the strengthening of these cuts. Furthermore, we design a multi-tree search technique to identify more cuts, effectively narrowing the search space and accelerating the BaB algorithm. Our results demonstrate that BICCOS can generate hundreds of useful cuts during the branch-and-bound process and consistently increase the number of verifiable instances compared to other state-of-the-art neural network verifiers on a wide range of benchmarks, including large networks that previous cutting plane methods could not scale to.
Duo Zhou, Christopher Brix, Grani Adiwena Hanasusanto, Huan Zhang 0001
NeurIPS2
2023 Provably Bounding Neural Network Preimages
abstract
Most work on the formal verification of neural networks has focused on bounding the set of outputs that correspond to a given set of inputs (for example, bounded perturbations of a nominal input). However, many use cases of neural network verification require solving the inverse problem, or over-approximating the set of inputs that lead to certain outputs. We present the INVPROP algorithm for verifying properties over the preimage of a linearly constrained output set, which can be combined with branch-and-bound to increase precision. Contrary to other approaches, our efficient algorithm is GPU-accelerated and does not require a linear programming solver. We demonstrate our algorithm for identifying safe control regions for a dynamical system via backward reachability analysis, verifying adversarial robustness, and detecting out-of-distribution inputs to a neural network. Our results show that in certain settings, we find over-approximations over $2500\times$ tighter than prior work while being $2.5\times$ faster. By strengthening robustness verification with output constraints, we consistently verify more properties than the previous state-of-the-art on multiple benchmarks, including a large model with 167k neurons in VNN-COMP 2023. Our algorithm has been incorporated into the $\alpha,\beta$-CROWN verifier, available at https://abcrown.org.
Suhas Kotha, Christopher Brix, J. Zico Kolter, Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, Huan Zhang 0001
NeurIPS2
2023 First three years of the international verification of neural networks competition (VNN-COMP)
abstract
Abstract This paper presents a summary and meta-analysis of the first three iterations of the annual International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP), held in 2020, 2021, and 2022. In the VNN-COMP, participants submit software tools that analyze whether given neural networks satisfy specifications describing their input-output behavior. These neural networks and specifications cover a variety of problem classes and tasks, corresponding to safety and robustness properties in image classification, neural control, reinforcement learning, and autonomous systems. We summarize the key processes, rules, and results, present trends observed over the last three years, and provide an outlook into possible future developments.
Christopher Brix, Mark Niklas Müller, Stanley Bak, Taylor T. Johnson, Changliu Liu
Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf.1
2021 Two-Way Neural Machine Translation: A Proof of Concept for Bidirectional Translation Modeling Using a Two-Dimensional Grid
abstract
Neural translation models have proven to be effective in capturing sufficient information from a source sentence and generating a high-quality target sentence. However, it is not easy to get the best effect for bidirectional translation, i.e., both source-to-target and target-to-source translation using a single model. If we exclude some pioneering attempts, such as multilingual systems, all other bidirectional translation approaches are required to train two individual models. This paper proposes to build a single end-to-end bidirectional translation model using a two-dimensional grid, where the left-to-right decoding generates source-to-target, and the bottom-to-up decoding creates target-to-source output. Instead of training two models independently, our approach encourages a single network to jointly learn to translate in both directions. Experiments on the WMT2018 German↔English and Turkish↔English translation tasks show that the proposed model is capable of generating a good translation quality and has sufficient potential to direct the research.
Parnia Bahar, Christopher Brix, Hermann Ney
SLT2
2020 Successfully Applying the Stabilized Lottery Ticket Hypothesis to the Transformer Architecture
abstract
Sparse models require less memory for storage and enable a faster inference by reducing the necessary number of FLOPs.This is relevant both for time-critical and on-device computations using neural networks.The stabilized lottery ticket hypothesis states that networks can be pruned after none or few training iterations, using a mask computed based on the unpruned converged model.On the transformer architecture and the WMT 2014 English→German and English→French tasks, we show that stabilized lottery ticket pruning performs similar to magnitude pruning for sparsity levels of up to 85%, and propose a new combination of pruning techniques that outperforms all other techniques for even higher levels of sparsity.Furthermore, we confirm that the parameter's initial sign and not its specific value is the primary factor for successful training, and show that magnitude pruning cannot be used to find winning lottery tickets.
Christopher Brix, Parnia Bahar, Hermann Ney
ACL1
2018 Towards Two-Dimensional Sequence to Sequence Model in Neural Machine Translation
abstract
This work investigates an alternative model for neural machine translation (NMT) and proposes a novel architecture, where we employ a multi-dimensional long short-term memory (MDLSTM) for translation modeling.In the state-of-the-art methods, source and target sentences are treated as one-dimensional sequences over time, while we view translation as a two-dimensional (2D) mapping using an MDLSTM layer to define the correspondence between source and target words.We extend beyond the current sequence to sequence backbone NMT models to a 2D structure in which the source and target sentences are aligned with each other in a 2D grid.Our proposed topology shows consistent improvements over attention-based sequence to sequence model on two WMT 2017 tasks, German↔English.
Parnia Bahar, Christopher Brix, Hermann Ney
EMNLP2