Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ken Hsieh

dblp:228/5726 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Computer networks · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 87% Machine learning and data management · 13%
Computer networks
1 paper
Network management and operations · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud infrastructure
0.412020
Gandalf: An Intelligent, End-To-End Analytics Service for Safe Deployment in Large-Scale Cloud Infrastructure · NSDI 2020
Data mining
anomaly detection
0.412019
Cross-dataset Time Series Anomaly Detection for Cloud Systems · USENIX ATC 2019
Data mining › anomaly detection
time series anomaly detection
0.412019
Cross-dataset Time Series Anomaly Detection for Cloud Systems · USENIX ATC 2019
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud management › cloud monitoring
cloud system monitoring
0.412019
Cross-dataset Time Series Anomaly Detection for Cloud Systems · USENIX ATC 2019
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud service reliability
0.312018
Predicting Node failure in cloud service systems · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2018
Cloud and datacenter computing › datacenter operations
node failure prediction
0.312018
Predicting Node failure in cloud service systems · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2018
Network management and operations › fault management
fault diagnosis
0.112020
Gandalf: An Intelligent, End-To-End Analytics Service for Safe Deployment in Large-Scale Cloud Infrastructure · NSDI 2020
Machine learning and data management
data management for machine learning
0.112019
Cross-dataset Time Series Anomaly Detection for Cloud Systems · USENIX ATC 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning · 0.9transfer learning · 0.8deep learning · 0.8ranking model · 0.3random forest · 0.3cost-sensitive learning · 0.3LSTM · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Gandalf: An Intelligent, End-To-End Analytics Service for Safe Deployment in Large-Scale Cloud Infrastructure
Ze Li 0005, Ken Hsieh, Yingnong Dang, Peng Huang 0005, Pankaj Singh, Xinsheng Yang, Qingwei Lin, Youjiang Wu, Sebastien Levy, Murali Chintalapati
NSDI3
2019 Cross-dataset Time Series Anomaly Detection for Cloud Systems
Xu Zhang 0024, Qingwei Lin, Yong Xu 0010, Si Qin, Hongyu Zhang 0002, Bo Qiao 0001, Yingnong Dang, Xinsheng Yang, Murali Chintalapati, Youjiang Wu, Ken Hsieh, Kaixin Sui, Yaohai Xu, Wenchi Zhang, Furao Shen, Dongmei Zhang 0001
USENIX ATC12
2018 Predicting Node failure in cloud service systems
abstract
In recent years, many traditional software systems have migrated to cloud computing platforms and are provided as online services. The service quality matters because system failures could seriously affect business and user experience. A cloud service system typically contains a large number of computing nodes. In reality, nodes may fail and affect service availability. In this paper, we propose a failure prediction technique, which can predict the failure-proneness of a node in a cloud service system based on historical data, before node failure actually happens. The ability to predict faulty nodes enables the allocation and migration of virtual machines to the healthy nodes, therefore improving service availability. Predicting node failure in cloud service systems is challenging, because a node failure could be caused by a variety of reasons and reflected by many temporal and spatial signals. Furthermore, the failure data is highly imbalanced. To tackle these challenges, we propose MING, a novel technique that combines: 1) a LSTM model to incorporate the temporal data, 2) a Random Forest model to incorporate spatial data; 3) a ranking model that embeds the intermediate results of the two models as feature inputs and ranks the nodes by their failure-proneness, 4) a cost-sensitive function to identify the optimal threshold for selecting the faulty nodes. We evaluate our approach using real-world data collected from a cloud service system. The results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed approach. We have also successfully applied the proposed approach in real industrial practice.
Qingwei Lin, Ken Hsieh, Yingnong Dang, Hongyu Zhang 0002, Kaixin Sui, Yong Xu 0010, Jian-Guang Lou, Chenggang Li, Youjiang Wu, Randolph Yao, Murali Chintalapati, Dongmei Zhang 0001
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE2