Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dafni Antotsiou

dblp:228/6671 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 41% Reinforcement learning · 41% Robot manipulation · 19%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning
1.122022
Modular Adaptive Policy Selection for Multi- Task Imitation Learning through Task Division · ICRA 2022
Adversarial Imitation Learning with Trajectorial Augmentation and Correction · ICRA 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning › transfer imitation learning
multi-task imitation learning
0.612022
Modular Adaptive Policy Selection for Multi- Task Imitation Learning through Task Division · ICRA 2022
Robotics › Robot manipulation › learning from demonstration
data augmentation for imitation learning
0.512021
Adversarial Imitation Learning with Trajectorial Augmentation and Correction · ICRA 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning
0.512021
Adversarial Imitation Learning with Trajectorial Augmentation and Correction · ICRA 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

proto-policies · 0.6meta-learning · 0.6semi-supervised correction network · 0.5adversarial imitation learning · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Modular Adaptive Policy Selection for Multi- Task Imitation Learning through Task Division
abstract
Deep imitation learning requires many expert demonstrations, which can be hard to obtain, especially when many tasks are involved. However, different tasks often share similarities, so learning them jointly can greatly benefit them and alleviate the need for many demonstrations. But, joint multi-task learning often suffers from negative transfer, sharing information that should be task-specific. In this work, we introduce a method to perform multi-task imitation while allowing for task-specific features. This is done by using proto-policies as modules to divide the tasks into simple sub-behaviours that can be shared. The proto-policies operate in parallel and are adaptively chosen by a selector mechanism that is jointly trained with the modules. Experiments on different sets of tasks show that our method improves upon the accuracy of single agents, task-conditioned and multi-headed multi-task agents, as well as state-of-the-art meta learning agents. We also demonstrate its ability to autonomously divide the tasks into both shared and task-specific sub-behaviours.
Dafni Antotsiou, Carlo Ciliberto, Tae-Kyun Kim 0001
ICRA1
2021 Adversarial Imitation Learning with Trajectorial Augmentation and Correction
abstract
Deep Imitation Learning requires a large number of expert demonstrations, which are not always easy to obtain, especially for complex tasks. A way to overcome this shortage of labels is through data augmentation. However, this cannot be easily applied to control tasks due to the sequential nature of the problem. In this work, we introduce a novel augmentation method which preserves the success of the augmented trajectories. To achieve this, we introduce a semi-supervised correction network that aims to correct distorted expert actions. To adequately test the abilities of the correction network, we develop an adversarial data augmented imitation architecture to train an imitation agent using synthetic experts. Additionally, we introduce a metric to measure diversity in trajectory datasets. Experiments show that our data augmentation strategy can improve accuracy and convergence time of adversarial imitation while preserving the diversity between the generated and real trajectories.
Dafni Antotsiou, Carlo Ciliberto, Tae-Kyun Kim 0001
ICRA1