Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brandon Carter 0001

dblp:228/6804-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-6318-2521ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 56% Image recognition and object detection · 44%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.612022
Maximum n-times Coverage for Vaccine Design · ICLR 2022
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization › submodular maximization
maximum coverage
0.612022
Maximum n-times Coverage for Vaccine Design · ICLR 2022
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.512021
Overinterpretation reveals image classification model pathologies · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.512021
Overinterpretation reveals image classification model pathologies · NeurIPS 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology
immunoinformatics
0.512021
Machine learning optimization of peptides for presentation by class II MHCs · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › immunoinformatics
peptide-MHC binding prediction
0.512021
Machine learning optimization of peptides for presentation by class II MHCs · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design › antibody design
complementarity-determining region design
0.412020
Antibody complementarity determining region design using high-capacity machine learning · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein design
0.412020
Antibody complementarity determining region design using high-capacity machine learning · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › immunoinformatics
vaccine design
0.212022
Maximum n-times Coverage for Vaccine Design · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.112021
Overinterpretation reveals image classification model pathologies · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

combinatorial optimization · 1.1yeast display assay · 0.5input dropout · 0.5ensembling · 0.5ensemble learning · 0.5deep residual network · 0.5Batched Gradient SIS · 0.5high-throughput sequencing · 0.4gradient-based machine learning · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Maximum n-times Coverage for Vaccine Design
Alexander Dimitrakakis, Brandon Carter 0001, David K. Gifford
ICLR3
2022 Embedding Comparator: Visualizing Differences in Global Structure and Local Neighborhoods via Small Multiples
abstract
Embeddings mapping high-dimensional discrete input to lower-dimensional continuous vector spaces have been widely adopted in machine learning applications as a way to capture domain semantics. Interviewing 13 embedding users across disciplines, we find comparing embeddings is a key task for deployment or downstream analysis but unfolds in a tedious fashion that poorly supports systematic exploration. In response, we present the Embedding Comparator, an interactive system that presents a global comparison of embedding spaces alongside fine-grained inspection of local neighborhoods. It systematically surfaces points of comparison by computing the similarity of the k-nearest neighbors of every embedded object between a pair of spaces. Through case studies across multiple modalities, we demonstrate our system rapidly reveals insights, such as semantic changes following fine-tuning, language changes over time, and differences between seemingly similar models. In evaluations with 15 participants, we find our system accelerates comparisons by shifting from laborious manual specification to browsing and manipulating visualizations.
Angie W. Boggust, Brandon Carter 0001, Arvind Satyanarayan
IUI2
2021 Overinterpretation reveals image classification model pathologies
abstract
Image classifiers are typically scored on their test set accuracy, but high accuracy can mask a subtle type of model failure. We find that high scoring convolutional neural networks (CNNs) on popular benchmarks exhibit troubling pathologies that allow them to display high accuracy even in the absence of semantically salient features. When a model provides a high-confidence decision without salient supporting input features, we say the classifier has overinterpreted its input, finding too much class-evidence in patterns that appear nonsensical to humans. Here, we demonstrate that neural networks trained on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet suffer from overinterpretation, and we find models on CIFAR-10 make confident predictions even when 95% of input images are masked and humans cannot discern salient features in the remaining pixel-subsets. We introduce Batched Gradient SIS, a new method for discovering sufficient input subsets for complex datasets, and use this method to show the sufficiency of border pixels in ImageNet for training and testing. Although these patterns portend potential model fragility in real-world deployment, they are in fact valid statistical patterns of the benchmark that alone suffice to attain high test accuracy. Unlike adversarial examples, overinterpretation relies upon unmodified image pixels. We find ensembling and input dropout can each help mitigate overinterpretation.
Brandon Carter 0001, Siddhartha Jain 0001, Jonas Mueller 0001, David K. Gifford
NeurIPS1
2021 Machine learning optimization of peptides for presentation by class II MHCs
abstract
SUMMARY: T cells play a critical role in cellular immune responses to pathogens and cancer and can be activated and expanded by Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC)-presented antigens contained in peptide vaccines. We present a machine learning method to optimize the presentation of peptides by class II MHCs by modifying their anchor residues. Our method first learns a model of peptide affinity for a class II MHC using an ensemble of deep residual networks, and then uses the model to propose anchor residue changes to improve peptide affinity. We use a high throughput yeast display assay to show that anchor residue optimization improves peptide binding. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Zheng Dai, Brooke D. Huisman, Brandon Carter 0001, Siddhartha Jain 0001, Michael E. Birnbaum, David K. Gifford
Bioinform.4
2020 Antibody complementarity determining region design using high-capacity machine learning
abstract
MOTIVATION: The precise targeting of antibodies and other protein therapeutics is required for their proper function and the elimination of deleterious off-target effects. Often the molecular structure of a therapeutic target is unknown and randomized methods are used to design antibodies without a model that relates antibody sequence to desired properties. RESULTS: Here, we present Ens-Grad, a machine learning method that can design complementarity determining regions of human Immunoglobulin G antibodies with target affinities that are superior to candidates derived from phage display panning experiments. We also demonstrate that machine learning can improve target specificity by the modular composition of models from different experimental campaigns, enabling a new integrative approach to improving target specificity. Our results suggest a new path for the discovery of therapeutic molecules by demonstrating that predictive and differentiable models of antibody binding can be learned from high-throughput experimental data without the need for target structural data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Sequencing data of the phage panning experiment are deposited at NIH's Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession number SRP158510. We make our code available at https://github.com/gifford-lab/antibody-2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Jonas Mueller 0001, Brandon Carter 0001, Jonas Schilz, Geraldine Horny, Michael E. Birnbaum, Stefan Ewert, David K. Gifford
Bioinform.4
2019 What made you do this? Understanding black-box decisions with sufficient input subsets
abstract
Local explanation frameworks aim to rationalize particular decisions made by a black-box prediction model. Existing techniques are often restricted to a specific type of predictor or based on input saliency, which may be undesirably sensitive to factors unrelated to the model’s decision making process. We instead propose sufficient input subsets that identify minimal subsets of features whose observed values alone suffice for the same decision to be reached, even if all other input feature values are missing. General principles that globally govern a model’s decision-making can also be revealed by searching for clusters of such input patterns across many data points. Our approach is conceptually straightforward, entirely model-agnostic, simply implemented using instance-wise backward selection, and able to produce more concise rationales than existing techniques. We demonstrate the utility of our interpretation method on various neural network models trained on text, image, and genomic data.
Brandon Carter 0001, Jonas Mueller 0001, Siddhartha Jain 0001, David K. Gifford
AISTATS1