Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kenneth T. Co
dblp:228/6888
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-2766-7326ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial example |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Procedural Noise Adversarial Examples for Black-Box Attacks on Deep Convolutional Networks · CCS 2019 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial machine learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Procedural Noise Adversarial Examples for Black-Box Attacks on Deep Convolutional Networks · CCS 2019 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
black-box attack |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Procedural Noise Adversarial Examples for Black-Box Attacks on Deep Convolutional Networks · CCS 2019 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
query-efficient attack |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Procedural Noise Adversarial Examples for Black-Box Attacks on Deep Convolutional Networks · CCS 2019 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack › adversarial perturbation
universal adversarial perturbation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Procedural Noise Adversarial Examples for Black-Box Attacks on Deep Convolutional Networks · CCS 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Procedural Noise Adversarial Examples for Black-Box Attacks on Deep Convolutional Networks · CCS 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network
deep convolutional networks |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Procedural Noise Adversarial Examples for Black-Box Attacks on Deep Convolutional Networks · CCS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
procedural noise functions · 0.8bayesian optimization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Jacobian Ensembles Improve Robustness Trade-Offs to Adversarial Attacks
Kenneth T. Co, David Martínez-Rego, Zhongyuan Hau, Emil C. Lupu |
ICANN (3) | 1 |
| 2021 | Jacobian Regularization for Mitigating Universal Adversarial Perturbations
Kenneth T. Co, David Martínez-Rego, Emil C. Lupu |
ICANN (4) | 1 |
| 2021 | Universal Adversarial Robustness of Texture and Shape-Biased ModelsabstractIncreasing shape-bias in deep neural networks has been shown to improve robustness to common corruptions and noise. In this paper we analyze the adversarial robustness of texture and shape-biased models to Universal Adversarial Perturbations (UAPs). We use UAPs to evaluate the robustness of DNN models with varying degrees of shape-based training. We find that shape-biased models do not markedly improve adversarial robustness, and we show that ensembles of texture and shape-biased models can improve universal adversarial robustness while maintaining strong performance. Kenneth T. Co, Luis Muñoz-González, Leslie Kanthan, Ben Glocker, Emil C. Lupu |
ICIP | 1 |
| 2019 | Procedural Noise Adversarial Examples for Black-Box Attacks on Deep Convolutional NetworksabstractDeep Convolutional Networks (DCNs) have been shown to be vulnerable to adversarial examples---perturbed inputs specifically designed to produce intentional errors in the learning algorithms at test time. Existing input-agnostic adversarial perturbations exhibit interesting visual patterns that are currently unexplained. In this paper, we introduce a structured approach for generating Universal Adversarial Perturbations (UAPs) with procedural noise functions. Our approach unveils the systemic vulnerability of popular DCN models like Inception v3 and YOLO v3, with single noise patterns able to fool a model on up to 90% of the dataset. Procedural noise allows us to generate a distribution of UAPs with high universal evasion rates using only a few parameters. Additionally, we propose Bayesian optimization to efficiently learn procedural noise parameters to construct inexpensive untargeted black-box attacks. We demonstrate that it can achieve an average of less than 10 queries per successful attack, a 100-fold improvement on existing methods. We further motivate the use of input-agnostic defences to increase the stability of models to adversarial perturbations. The universality of our attacks suggests that DCN models may be sensitive to aggregations of low-level class-agnostic features. These findings give insight on the nature of some universal adversarial perturbations and how they could be generated in other applications. Kenneth T. Co, Luis Muñoz-González, Sixte de Maupeou, Emil C. Lupu |
CCS | 1 |