Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aniket Bajpai
dblp:228/8251 · also Aniket (Nick) Bajpai
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 52% Reinforcement learning · 40% Representation and self-supervised learning · 7% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › decision making under uncertainty
relational markov decision process |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Symbolic Network: Generalized Neural Policies for Relational MDPs · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
relational reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Symbolic Network: Generalized Neural Policies for Relational MDPs · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Transfer of Deep Reactive Policies for MDP Planning · NeurIPS 2018 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty › probabilistic planning
markov decision process planning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Transfer of Deep Reactive Policies for MDP Planning · NeurIPS 2018 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
probabilistic planning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Transfer of Deep Reactive Policies for MDP Planning · NeurIPS 2018 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › learning for planning
transfer learning for planning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Transfer of Deep Reactive Policies for MDP Planning · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
transfer learning in reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Transfer of Deep Reactive Policies for MDP Planning · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning
state representation learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Transfer of Deep Reactive Policies for MDP Planning · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › embedding learning
unified embedding |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Transfer of Deep Reactive Policies for MDP Planning · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
relational neural models · 0.4node embedding · 0.4graph neural network · 0.4symbolic transition function · 0.3state embedding · 0.3deep reinforcement learning · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Symbolic Network: Generalized Neural Policies for Relational MDPsabstractA Relational Markov Decision Process (RMDP) is a first-order representation to express all instances of a single probabilistic planning domain with possibly unbounded number of objects. Early work in RMDPs outputs generalized (instance-independent) first-order policies or value functions as a means to solve all instances of a domain at once. Unfortunately, this line of work met with limited success due to inherent limitations of the representation space used in such policies or value functions. Can neural models provide the missing link by easily representing more complex generalized policies, thus making them effective on all instances of a given domain? We present SymNet, the first neural approach for solving RMDPs that are expressed in the probabilistic planning language of RDDL. SymNet trains a set of shared parameters for an RDDL domain using training instances from that domain. For each instance, SymNet first converts it to an instance graph and then uses relational neural models to compute node embeddings. It then scores each ground action as a function over the first-order action symbols and node embeddings related to the action. Given a new test instance from the same domain, SymNet architecture with pre-trained parameters scores each ground action and chooses the best action. This can be accomplished in a single forward pass without any retraining on the test instance, thus implicitly representing a neural generalized policy for the whole domain. Our experiments on nine RDDL domains from IPPC demonstrate that SymNet policies are significantly better than random and sometimes even more effective than training a state-of-the-art deep reactive policy from scratch. Sankalp Garg, Aniket Bajpai, Mausam |
ICML | 2 |
| 2018 | Transfer of Deep Reactive Policies for MDP PlanningabstractDomain-independent probabilistic planners input an MDP description in a factored representation language such as PPDDL or RDDL, and exploit the specifics of the representation for faster planning. Traditional algorithms operate on each problem instance independently, and good methods for transferring experience from policies of other instances of a domain to a new instance do not exist. Recently, researchers have begun exploring the use of deep reactive policies, trained via deep reinforcement learning (RL), for MDP planning domains. One advantage of deep reactive policies is that they are more amenable to transfer learning. In this paper, we present the first domain-independent transfer algorithm for MDP planning domains expressed in an RDDL representation. Our architecture exploits the symbolic state configuration and transition function of the domain (available via RDDL) to learn a shared embedding space for states and state-action pairs for all problem instances of a domain. We then learn an RL agent in the embedding space, making a near zero-shot transfer possible, i.e., without much training on the new instance, and without using the domain simulator at all. Experiments on three different benchmark domains underscore the value of our transfer algorithm. Compared against planning from scratch, and a state-of-the-art RL transfer algorithm, our transfer solution has significantly superior learning curves. Aniket Bajpai, Sankalp Garg, Mausam |
NeurIPS | 1 |