Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sankalp Garg

dblp:228/8352 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-8390-4512ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 23% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 21% Vision and language · 21%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model › vision-language model adaptation
CLIP fine-tuning
0.712023
Finetune like you pretrain: Improved finetuning of zero-shot vision models · CVPR 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › fine-tuning
contrastive fine-tuning
0.712023
Finetune like you pretrain: Improved finetuning of zero-shot vision models · CVPR 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning
0.712023
Finetune like you pretrain: Improved finetuning of zero-shot vision models · CVPR 2023
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
image-text model
0.712023
Finetune like you pretrain: Improved finetuning of zero-shot vision models · CVPR 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning
dynamic graph learning
0.412020
Temporal Attribute Prediction via Joint Modeling of Multi-Relational Structure Evolution · IJCAI 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › decision making under uncertainty
relational markov decision process
0.412020
Symbolic Network: Generalized Neural Policies for Relational MDPs · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
relational reinforcement learning
0.412020
Symbolic Network: Generalized Neural Policies for Relational MDPs · ICML 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph
temporal knowledge graph
0.412020
Temporal Attribute Prediction via Joint Modeling of Multi-Relational Structure Evolution · IJCAI 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning
0.312018
Transfer of Deep Reactive Policies for MDP Planning · NeurIPS 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty › probabilistic planning
markov decision process planning
0.312018
Transfer of Deep Reactive Policies for MDP Planning · NeurIPS 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
probabilistic planning
0.312018
Transfer of Deep Reactive Policies for MDP Planning · NeurIPS 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › learning for planning
transfer learning for planning
0.312018
Transfer of Deep Reactive Policies for MDP Planning · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
transfer learning in reinforcement learning
0.312018
Transfer of Deep Reactive Policies for MDP Planning · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning
state representation learning
0.112018
Transfer of Deep Reactive Policies for MDP Planning · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › embedding learning
unified embedding
0.112018
Transfer of Deep Reactive Policies for MDP Planning · NeurIPS 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

image-text pretraining · 0.7contrastive loss · 0.7relational neural models · 0.4recurrent neural network · 0.4node embedding · 0.4joint link and attribute prediction · 0.4graph neural network · 0.4symbolic transition function · 0.3state embedding · 0.3deep reinforcement learning · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Finetune like you pretrain: Improved finetuning of zero-shot vision models
abstract
Finetuning image-text models such as CLIP achieves state-of-the-art accuracies on a variety of benchmarks. However, recent works (Kumar et al., 2022; Wortsman et al., 2021) have shown that even subtle differences in the finetuning process can lead to surprisingly large differences in the final performance, both for in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) data. In this work, we show that a natural and simple approach of mimicking contrastive pretraining consistently outperforms alternative finetuning approaches. Specifically, we cast downstream class labels as text prompts and continue optimizing the contrastive loss between image embeddings and class-descriptive prompt embeddings (contrastive finetuning). Our method consistently outperforms baselines across 7 distribution shift, 6 transfer learning, and 3 few-shot learning benchmarks. On WILDS-iWILDCam, our proposed approach FLYP outperforms the top of the leaderboard by 2.3% ID and 2.7% OOD, giving the highest reported accuracy. Averaged across 7 OOD datasets (2 WILDS and 5 ImageNet associated shifts), FLYP gives gains of 4.2% OOD over standard finetuning and outperforms current state-of-the-art (LP-FT) by more than 1 % both ID and OOD. Similarly, on 3 few-shot learning benchmarks, FLYP gives gains up to 4.6% over standard finetuning and 4.4% over the state-of-the-art. Thus we establish our proposed method of contrastive finetuning as a simple and intuitive state-of-the-art for supervised finetuning of image-text models like CLIP. Code is available at https://github.com/locuslab/FLYP.
Sachin Goyal, Ananya Kumar, Sankalp Garg, J. Zico Kolter, Aditi Raghunathan
CVPR3
2020 Symbolic Network: Generalized Neural Policies for Relational MDPs
abstract
A Relational Markov Decision Process (RMDP) is a first-order representation to express all instances of a single probabilistic planning domain with possibly unbounded number of objects. Early work in RMDPs outputs generalized (instance-independent) first-order policies or value functions as a means to solve all instances of a domain at once. Unfortunately, this line of work met with limited success due to inherent limitations of the representation space used in such policies or value functions. Can neural models provide the missing link by easily representing more complex generalized policies, thus making them effective on all instances of a given domain? We present SymNet, the first neural approach for solving RMDPs that are expressed in the probabilistic planning language of RDDL. SymNet trains a set of shared parameters for an RDDL domain using training instances from that domain. For each instance, SymNet first converts it to an instance graph and then uses relational neural models to compute node embeddings. It then scores each ground action as a function over the first-order action symbols and node embeddings related to the action. Given a new test instance from the same domain, SymNet architecture with pre-trained parameters scores each ground action and chooses the best action. This can be accomplished in a single forward pass without any retraining on the test instance, thus implicitly representing a neural generalized policy for the whole domain. Our experiments on nine RDDL domains from IPPC demonstrate that SymNet policies are significantly better than random and sometimes even more effective than training a state-of-the-art deep reactive policy from scratch.
Sankalp Garg, Aniket Bajpai, Mausam
ICML1
2020 Temporal Attribute Prediction via Joint Modeling of Multi-Relational Structure Evolution
abstract
Time series prediction is an important problem in machine learning. Previous methods for time series prediction did not involve additional information. With a lot of dynamic knowledge graphs available, we can use this additional information to predict the time series better. Recently, there has been a focus on the application of deep representation learning on dynamic graphs. These methods predict the structure of the graph by reasoning over the interactions in the graph at previous time steps. In this paper, we propose a new framework to incorporate the information from dynamic knowledge graphs for time series prediction. We show that if the information contained in the graph and the time series data are closely related, then this inter-dependence can be used to predict the time series with improved accuracy. Our framework, DArtNet, learns a static embedding for every node in the graph as well as a dynamic embedding which is dependent on the dynamic attribute value (time-series). Then it captures the information from the neighborhood by taking a relation specific mean and encodes the history information using RNN. We jointly train the model link prediction and attribute prediction. We evaluate our method on five specially curated datasets for this problem and show a consistent improvement in time series prediction results. We release the data and code of model DArtNet for future research.
Sankalp Garg, Navodita Sharma, Woojeong Jin 0001, Xiang Ren 0001
IJCAI1
2018 Transfer of Deep Reactive Policies for MDP Planning
abstract
Domain-independent probabilistic planners input an MDP description in a factored representation language such as PPDDL or RDDL, and exploit the specifics of the representation for faster planning. Traditional algorithms operate on each problem instance independently, and good methods for transferring experience from policies of other instances of a domain to a new instance do not exist. Recently, researchers have begun exploring the use of deep reactive policies, trained via deep reinforcement learning (RL), for MDP planning domains. One advantage of deep reactive policies is that they are more amenable to transfer learning. In this paper, we present the first domain-independent transfer algorithm for MDP planning domains expressed in an RDDL representation. Our architecture exploits the symbolic state configuration and transition function of the domain (available via RDDL) to learn a shared embedding space for states and state-action pairs for all problem instances of a domain. We then learn an RL agent in the embedding space, making a near zero-shot transfer possible, i.e., without much training on the new instance, and without using the domain simulator at all. Experiments on three different benchmark domains underscore the value of our transfer algorithm. Compared against planning from scratch, and a state-of-the-art RL transfer algorithm, our transfer solution has significantly superior learning curves.
Aniket Bajpai, Sankalp Garg, Mausam
NeurIPS2