EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mohammad Bashiri
dblp:229/0971
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
3D vision · 39% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 23% Representation and self-supervised learning · 20% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
2.1 | 3 | 2025 | Learning and aligning single-neuron invariance manifolds in visual cortex · ICLR 2025 Retrospective for the Dynamic Sensorium Competition for predicting large-scale mouse primary visual cortex activity from videos · NeurIPS 2024 A flow-based latent state generative model of neural population responses to natural images · NeurIPS 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › neural response modeling
neural response prediction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Retrospective for the Dynamic Sensorium Competition for predicting large-scale mouse primary visual cortex activity from videos · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › computational neuroscience › neural coding
brain encoding models |
0.7 | 2 | 2023 | Generalization in data-driven models of primary visual cortex · ICLR 2021 Bayesian Oracle for bounding information gain in neural encoding models · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Bayesian Oracle for bounding information gain in neural encoding models · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A flow-based latent state generative model of neural population responses to natural images · NeurIPS 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › biological vision modeling
visual cortex modeling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Generalization in data-driven models of primary visual cortex · ICLR 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › neural response modeling
neural system identification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A flow-based latent state generative model of neural population responses to natural images · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Generalization in data-driven models of primary visual cortex · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | A flow-based latent state generative model of neural population responses to natural images · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep neural network · 2.7affine transformation · 1.7normalizing flow · 1.0benchmark competition · 0.8artificial neural network · 0.8bayesian oracle · 0.7data-driven modeling · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Learning and aligning single-neuron invariance manifolds in visual cortexabstractUnderstanding how sensory neurons exhibit selectivity to certain features and invariance to others is central to uncovering the computational principles underlying robustness and generalization in visual perception. Most existing methods for characterizing selectivity and invariance identify single or finite discrete sets of stimuli. Since these are only isolated measurements from an underlying continuous manifold, characterizing invariance properties accurately and comparing them across neurons with varying receptive field size, position, and orientation, becomes challenging. Consequently, a systematic analysis of invariance types at the population level remains under-explored. Building on recent advances in learning continuous invariance manifolds, we introduce a novel method to accurately identify and align invariance manifolds of visual sensory neurons, overcoming these challenges. Our approach first learns the continuous invariance manifold of stimuli that maximally excite a neuron modeled by a response-predicting deep neural network. It then learns an affine transformation on the pixel coordinates such that the same manifold activates another neuron as strongly as possible, effectively aligning their invariance manifolds spatially. This alignment provides a principled way to quantify and compare neuronal invariances irrespective of receptive field differences. Using simulated neurons, we demonstrate that our method accurately learns and aligns known invariance manifolds, robustly identifying functional clusters. When applied to macaque V1 neurons, it reveals functional clusters of neurons, including simple and complex cells. Overall, our method enables systematic, quantitative exploration of the neural invariance landscape, to gain new insights into the functional properties of visual sensory neurons. Mohammad Bashiri, Luca Baroni, Ján Antolík, Fabian H. Sinz |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | Retrospective for the Dynamic Sensorium Competition for predicting large-scale mouse primary visual cortex activity from videosabstractUnderstanding how biological visual systems process information is challenging because of the nonlinear relationship between visual input and neuronal responses. Artificial neural networks allow computational neuroscientists to create predictive models that connect biological and machine vision.Machine learning has benefited tremendously from benchmarks that compare different models on the same task under standardized conditions. However, there was no standardized benchmark to identify state-of-the-art dynamic models of the mouse visual system.To address this gap, we established the SENSORIUM 2023 Benchmark Competition with dynamic input, featuring a new large-scale dataset from the primary visual cortex of ten mice. This dataset includes responses from 78,853 neurons to 2 hours of dynamic stimuli per neuron, together with behavioral measurements such as running speed, pupil dilation, and eye movements.The competition ranked models in two tracks based on predictive performance for neuronal responses on a held-out test set: one focusing on predicting in-domain natural stimuli and another on out-of-distribution (OOD) stimuli to assess model generalization.As part of the NeurIPS 2023 Competition Track, we received more than 160 model submissions from 22 teams. Several new architectures for predictive models were proposed, and the winning teams improved the previous state-of-the-art model by 50\%. Access to the dataset as well as the benchmarking infrastructure will remain online at www.sensorium-competition.net. Polina Turishcheva, Paul G. Fahey, Michaela Vystrcilová, Laura Hansel, Rachel Froebe, Kayla Ponder, Yongrong Qiu, Konstantin Willeke, Mohammad Bashiri, Ruslan Baikulov, Yu Zhu 0008, Lei Ma 0008, Tiejun Huang 0001, Bryan Li, Wolf De Wulf, Nina Kudryashova, Matthias H. Hennig, Nathalie Rochefort, Arno Onken, Eric Y. Wang, Zhiwei Ding, Andreas S. Tolias, Fabian H. Sinz, Alexander S. Ecker |
NeurIPS | 9 |
| 2023 | Bayesian Oracle for bounding information gain in neural encoding models
Konstantin-Klemens Lurz, Mohammad Bashiri, Edgar Y. Walker, Fabian H. Sinz |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2021 | Generalization in data-driven models of primary visual cortex
Konstantin-Klemens Lurz, Mohammad Bashiri, Konstantin Willeke, Akshay K. Jagadish, Edgar Y. Walker, Santiago A. Cadena, Taliah Muhammad, Erick Cobos, Andreas S. Tolias, Alexander S. Ecker, Fabian H. Sinz |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2021 | A flow-based latent state generative model of neural population responses to natural imagesabstractWe present a joint deep neural system identification model for two major sources of neural variability: stimulus-driven and stimulus-conditioned fluctuations. To this end, we combine (1) state-of-the-art deep networks for stimulus-driven activity and (2) a flexible, normalizing flow-based generative model to capture the stimulus-conditioned variability including noise correlations. This allows us to train the model end-to-end without the need for sophisticated probabilistic approximations associated with many latent state models for stimulus-conditioned fluctuations. We train the model on the responses of thousands of neurons from multiple areas of the mouse visual cortex to natural images. We show that our model outperforms previous state-of-the-art models in predicting the distribution of neural population responses to novel stimuli, including shared stimulus-conditioned variability. Furthermore, it successfully learns known latent factors of the population responses that are related to behavioral variables such as pupil dilation, and other factors that vary systematically with brain area or retinotopic location. Overall, our model accurately accounts for two critical sources of neural variability while avoiding several complexities associated with many existing latent state models. It thus provides a useful tool for uncovering the interplay between different factors that contribute to variability in neural activity. Mohammad Bashiri, Edgar Y. Walker, Konstantin-Klemens Lurz, Akshay K. Jagadish, Taliah Muhammad, Zhiwei Ding, Zhuokun Ding, Andreas S. Tolias, Fabian H. Sinz |
NeurIPS | 1 |