EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Santiago Vargas
dblp:229/1143
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-1612-8626ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
6 papers |
Content delivery and video streaming · 51% Network measurement and analytics · 18% Transport protocols and congestion control · 18% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Content delivery and video streaming
peer-to-peer content distribution |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Is IPFS Ready for Decentralized Video Streaming? · WWW 2023 |
Content delivery and video streaming › quality of experience
video streaming performance |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Is IPFS Ready for Decentralized Video Streaming? · WWW 2023 |
Transport protocols and congestion control › TCP congestion control
BBR |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Are mobiles ready for BBR? · IMC 2022 |
Network measurement and analytics
bandwidth estimation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | BBR Bufferbloat in DASH Video · WWW 2021 |
Transport protocols and congestion control › TCP congestion control
BBR congestion control |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | BBR Bufferbloat in DASH Video · WWW 2021 |
Content delivery and video streaming
360-degree video streaming |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Streaming 360-Degree Videos Using Super-Resolution · INFOCOM 2020 |
Content delivery and video streaming › 360-degree video streaming
viewport prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Streaming 360-Degree Videos Using Super-Resolution · INFOCOM 2020 |
Content delivery and video streaming
quality of experience |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Impact of Device Performance on Mobile Internet QoE · Internet Measurement Conference 2018 |
Network measurement and analytics › internet measurement
peer-to-peer network measurement |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Is IPFS Ready for Decentralized Video Streaming? · WWW 2023 |
Image and video processing
super-resolution |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Streaming 360-Degree Videos Using Super-Resolution · INFOCOM 2020 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
machine-to-machine communication |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Characterizing JSON Traffic Patterns on a CDN · Internet Measurement Conference 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
video encoding · 0.9deep learning · 0.9measurement study · 0.7performance benchmarking · 0.6packet pacing analysis · 0.6queue analysis · 0.5bandwidth estimation algorithm · 0.5ngram modeling · 0.4cache analysis · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Is IPFS Ready for Decentralized Video Streaming?abstractInterPlanetary File System (IPFS) is a peer-to-peer protocol for decentralized content storage and retrieval. The IPFS platform has the potential to help users evade censorship and avoid a central point of failure. IPFS is seeing increasing adoption for distributing various kinds of files, including video. However, the performance of video streaming on IPFS has not been well-studied. We conduct a measurement study with over 28,000 videos hosted on the IPFS network and find that video streaming experiences high stall rates due to relatively high Round Trip Times (RTT). Further, videos are encoded using a single static quality, because of which streaming cannot adapt to different network conditions. Zhengyu Wu, ChengHao Ryan Yang, Santiago Vargas, Aruna Balasubramanian |
WWW | 3 |
| 2022 | Are mobiles ready for BBR?abstractBBR is a new congestion control algorithm that has seen widespread Internet adoption in recent years with an estimated 40% of Internet traffic volume as BBR traffic. While many studies examine the performance and fairness of BBR on desktops and servers, there is still a question of how BBR would behave on mobile devices. This is especially important because mobiles represent a large segment of Internet devices. In this work, we study the potential performance bottlenecks of BBR if it were to be deployed on Android devices. We compare the performance of BBR and the default congestion control algorithm Cubic for different devices and device configurations. We find that BBR performs poorly compared to Cubic, especially under low-end device configurations. Further investigation reveals that this poor performance is because of packet pacing which is enabled in BBR by default. Pacing increases the computational overhead, which can affect performance for low-end devices. To address this problem, we propose a first cut solution that modifies BBR's pacing behavior to improve performance while still retaining the benefits of packet pacing. Santiago Vargas, Gautham Gunapati, Anshul Gandhi, Aruna Balasubramanian |
IMC | 1 |
| 2021 | BBR Bufferbloat in DASH VideoabstractBBR is a new congestion control algorithm and is seeing increased adoption especially for video traffic. BBR solves the bufferbloat problem in legacy loss-based congestion control algorithms where application performance drops considerably when router buffers are deep. BBR regulates traffic such that router queues don’t build up to avoid the bufferbloat problem while still maintaining high throughput. However, our analysis shows that video applications experience significantly poor performance when using BBR under deep buffers. In fact, we find that video traffic sees inflated latencies because of long queues at the router, ultimately degrading video performance. To understand this dichotomy, we study the interaction between BBR and DASH video. Our investigation reveals that BBR under deep buffers and high network burstiness severely overestimates available bandwidth and does not converge to steady state, both of which results in BBR sending substantially more data into the network, causing a queue buildup. This elevated packet sending rate under BBR is ultimately caused by the router’s ability to absorb bursts in traffic, which destabilizes BBR’s bandwidth estimation and overrides BBR’s expected logic for exiting the startup phase. We design a new bandwidth estimation algorithm and apply it to BBR (and a still-unreleased, newer version of BBR called BBR2). Our modified BBR and BBR2 both see significantly improved video QoE even under deep buffers. Santiago Vargas, Rebecca Drucker, Aiswarya Renganathan, Aruna Balasubramanian, Anshul Gandhi |
WWW | 1 |
| 2020 | Streaming 360-Degree Videos Using Super-Resolutionabstract360° videos provide an immersive experience to users, but require considerably more bandwidth to stream compared to regular videos. State-of-the-art 360° video streaming systems use viewport prediction to reduce bandwidth requirement, that involves predicting which part of the video the user will view and only fetching that content. However, viewport prediction is error prone resulting in poor user Quality of Experience (QoE). We design PARSEC, a 360° video streaming system that reduces bandwidth requirement while improving video quality. PARSEC trades off bandwidth for additional client-side computation to achieve its goals. PARSEC uses an approach based on super-resolution, where the video is significantly compressed at the server and the client runs a deep learning model to enhance the video to a much higher quality. PARSEC addresses a set of challenges associated with using super-resolution for 360° video streaming: large deep learning models, slow inference rate, and variance in the quality of the enhanced videos. To this end, PAR-SEC trains small micro-models over shorter video segments, and then combines traditional video encoding with super-resolution techniques to overcome the challenges. We evaluate PARSEC on a real WiFi network, over a broadband network trace released by FCC, and over a 4G/LTE network trace. PARSEC significantly outperforms the state-of-art 360° video streaming systems while reducing the bandwidth requirement. Mallesham Dasari, Arani Bhattacharya, Santiago Vargas, Pranjal Sahu, Aruna Balasubramanian, Samir Ranjan Das |
INFOCOM | 3 |
| 2019 | Characterizing JSON Traffic Patterns on a CDNabstractContent delivery networks serve a major fraction of the Internet traffic, and their geographically deployed infrastructure makes them a good vantage point to observe traffic access patterns. We perform a large-scale investigation to characterize Web traffic patterns observed from a major CDN infrastructure. Specifically, we discover that responses with application/json content-type form a growing majority of all HTTP requests. As a result, we seek to understand what types of devices and applications are requesting JSON objects and explore opportunities to optimize CDN delivery of JSON traffic. Our study shows that mobile applications account for at least 52% of JSON traffic on the CDN and embedded devices account for another 12% of all JSON traffic. We also find that more than 55% of JSON traffic on the CDN is uncacheable, showing that a large portion of JSON traffic on the CDN is dynamic. By further looking at patterns of periodicity in requests, we find that 6.3% of JSON traffic is periodically requested and reflects the use of (partially) autonomous software systems, IoT devices, and other kinds of machine-to-machine communication. Finally, we explore dependencies in JSON traffic through the lens of ngram models and find that these models can capture patterns between subsequent requests. We can potentially leverage this to prefetch requests, improving the cache hit ratio. Santiago Vargas, Utkarsh Goel, Moritz Steiner, Aruna Balasubramanian |
Internet Measurement Conference | 1 |
| 2018 | Impact of Device Performance on Mobile Internet QoE
Mallesham Dasari, Santiago Vargas, Arani Bhattacharya, Aruna Balasubramanian, Samir Ranjan Das, Michael Ferdman |
Internet Measurement Conference | 2 |