Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chongli Qin
dblp:229/4236
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 66% Generative modeling · 28% Representation and self-supervised learning · 6% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training |
1.2 | 3 | 2020 | Achieving Robustness in the Wild via Adversarial Mixing With Disentangled Representations · CVPR 2020 Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearization · NeurIPS 2019 Scalable Verified Training for Provably Robust Image Classification · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.9 | 2 | 2020 | Training Generative Adversarial Networks by Solving Ordinary Differential Equations · NeurIPS 2020 Achieving Robustness in the Wild via Adversarial Mixing With Disentangled Representations · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Achieving Robustness in the Wild via Adversarial Mixing With Disentangled Representations · CVPR 2020 Scalable Verified Training for Provably Robust Image Classification · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative model evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Feature Likelihood Score: Evaluating the Generalization of Generative Models Using Samples · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
certified robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Framework for robustness Certification of Smoothed Classifiers using F-Divergences · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
disentangled representation learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Achieving Robustness in the Wild via Adversarial Mixing With Disentangled Representations · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
StyleGAN |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Achieving Robustness in the Wild via Adversarial Mixing With Disentangled Representations · CVPR 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical analysis
ODE solvers |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Training Generative Adversarial Networks by Solving Ordinary Differential Equations · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
ordinary differential equation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Training Generative Adversarial Networks by Solving Ordinary Differential Equations · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearization · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
calibration |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearization · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › certified robustness
interval bound propagation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Scalable Verified Training for Provably Robust Image Classification · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
neural network verification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Verification of Non-Linear Specifications for Neural Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
runge-kutta · 0.9integration error control · 0.9sample-based evaluation · 0.7likelihood estimation · 0.7randomized smoothing · 0.4f-divergence · 0.4disentangled representation · 0.4adversarial mixing · 0.4StyleGAN · 0.4adversarial training · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Feature Likelihood Score: Evaluating the Generalization of Generative Models Using Samples
Marco Jiralerspong, Joey Bose, Ian Gemp, Chongli Qin, Yoram Bachrach, Gauthier Gidel |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2020 | Achieving Robustness in the Wild via Adversarial Mixing With Disentangled RepresentationsabstractRecent research has made the surprising finding that state-of-the-art deep learning models sometimes fail to generalize to small variations of the input. Adversarial training has been shown to be an effective approach to overcome this problem. However, its application has been limited to enforcing invariance to analytically defined transformations like lp-norm bounded perturbations. Such perturbations do not necessarily cover plausible real-world variations that preserve the semantics of the input (such as a change in lighting conditions). In this paper, we propose a novel approach to express and formalize robustness to these kinds of real-world transformations of the input. The two key ideas underlying our formulation are (1) leveraging disentangled representations of the input to define different factors of variations, and (2) generating new input images by adversarially composing the representations of different images. We use a StyleGAN model to demonstrate the efficacy of this framework. Specifically, we leverage the disentangled latent representations computed by a StyleGAN model to generate perturbations of an image that are similar to real-world variations (like adding make-up, or changing the skin-tone of a person) and train models to be invariant to these perturbations. Extensive experiments show that our method improves generalization and reduces the effect of spurious correlations (reducing the error rate of a "smile" detector by 21% for example). Sven Gowal, Chongli Qin, Po-Sen Huang, A. Taylan Cemgil, Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, Timothy A. Mann, Pushmeet Kohli |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2020 | A Framework for robustness Certification of Smoothed Classifiers using F-Divergences
Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, Jamie Hayes, Borja Balle, J. Zico Kolter, Chongli Qin, András György 0001, Sven Gowal, Pushmeet Kohli |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2020 | Training Generative Adversarial Networks by Solving Ordinary Differential EquationsabstractThe instability of Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) training has frequently been attributed to gradient descent. Consequently, recent methods have aimed to tailor the models and training procedures to stabilise the discrete updates. In contrast, we study the continuous-time dynamics induced by GAN training. Both theory and toy experiments suggest that these dynamics are in fact surprisingly stable. From this perspective, we hypothesise that instabilities in training GANs arise from the integration error in discretising the continuous dynamics. We experimentally verify that well-known ODE solvers (such as Runge-Kutta) can stabilise training - when combined with a regulariser that controls the integration error. Our approach represents a radical departure from previous methods which typically use adaptive optimisation and stabilisation techniques that constrain the functional space (e.g. Spectral Normalisation). Evaluation on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet shows that our method outperforms several strong baselines, demonstrating its efficacy. Chongli Qin, Yan Wu 0010, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Andrew Brock, Jeff Donahue, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Pushmeet Kohli |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Scalable Verified Training for Provably Robust Image ClassificationabstractRecent work has shown that it is possible to train deep neural networks that are provably robust to norm-bounded adversarial perturbations. Most of these methods are based on minimizing an upper bound on the worst-case loss over all possible adversarial perturbations. While these techniques show promise, they often result in difficult optimization procedures that remain hard to scale to larger networks. Through a comprehensive analysis, we show how a simple bounding technique, interval bound propagation (IBP), can be exploited to train large provably robust neural networks that beat the state-of-the-art in verified accuracy. While the upper bound computed by IBP can be quite weak for general networks, we demonstrate that an appropriate loss and clever hyper-parameter schedule allow the network to adapt such that the IBP bound is tight. This results in a fast and stable learning algorithm that outperforms more sophisticated methods and achieves state-of-the-art results on MNIST, CIFAR-10 and SVHN. It also allows us to train the largest model to be verified beyond vacuous bounds on a downscaled version of IMAGENET. Sven Gowal, Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, Robert Stanforth, Rudy Bunel, Chongli Qin, Jonathan Uesato, Relja Arandjelovic, Timothy A. Mann, Pushmeet Kohli |
ICCV | 5 |
| 2019 | Verification of Non-Linear Specifications for Neural Networks
Chongli Qin, Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, Brendan O'Donoghue, Rudy Bunel, Robert Stanforth, Sven Gowal, Jonathan Uesato, Grzegorz Swirszcz, Pushmeet Kohli |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |
| 2019 | Adversarial Robustness through Local LinearizationabstractAdversarial training is an effective methodology for training deep neural networks that are robust against adversarial, norm-bounded perturbations. However, the computational cost of adversarial training grows prohibitively as the size of the model and number of input dimensions increase. Further, training against less expensive and therefore weaker adversaries produces models that are robust against weak attacks but break down under attacks that are stronger. This is often attributed to the phenomenon of gradient obfuscation; such models have a highly non-linear loss surface in the vicinity of training examples, making it hard for gradient-based attacks to succeed even though adversarial examples still exist. In this work, we introduce a novel regularizer that encourages the loss to behave linearly in the vicinity of the training data, thereby penalizing gradient obfuscation while encouraging robustness. We show via extensive experiments on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet, that models trained with our regularizer avoid gradient obfuscation and can be trained significantly faster than adversarial training. Using this regularizer, we exceed current state of the art and achieve 47% adversarial accuracy for ImageNet with L-infinity norm adversarial perturbations of radius 4/255 under an untargeted, strong, white-box attack. Additionally, we match state of the art results for CIFAR-10 at 8/255. Chongli Qin, James Martens, Sven Gowal, Dilip Krishnan, Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, Alhussein Fawzi, Soham De, Robert Stanforth, Pushmeet Kohli |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Efficient Neural Network Verification with Exactness Characterization
Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, Robert Stanforth, Sven Gowal, Chongli Qin, Soham De, Pushmeet Kohli |
UAI | 4 |