Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tristan Milne
dblp:229/4305
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 39% Deep learning architectures and training · 36% Optimization for machine learning · 26% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Wasserstein GANs with Gradient Penalty Compute Congested Transport · COLT 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization › gradient regularization
gradient penalty |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Wasserstein GANs with Gradient Penalty Compute Congested Transport · COLT 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
Wasserstein GAN |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Wasserstein GANs with Gradient Penalty Compute Congested Transport · COLT 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Wasserstein GANs with Gradient Penalty Compute Congested Transport · COLT 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization landscape
critical point analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Piecewise Strong Convexity of Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss landscape |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Piecewise Strong Convexity of Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Piecewise Strong Convexity of Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
ReLU networks |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Piecewise Strong Convexity of Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
optimal transport · 1.1kantorovich potential · 1.1weight decay · 0.4stochastic gradient descent · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Wasserstein GANs with Gradient Penalty Compute Congested TransportabstractWasserstein GANs with Gradient Penalty (WGAN-GP) are a very popular method for training generative models to produce high quality synthetic data. While WGAN-GP were initially developed to calculate the Wasserstein 1 distance between generated and real data, recent works (e.g. [23]) have provided empirical evidence that this does not occur, and have argued that WGAN-GP perform well not in spite of this issue, but because of it. In this paper we show for the first time that WGAN-GP compute the minimum of a different optimal transport problem, the so-called congested transport [7]. Congested transport determines the cost of moving one distribution to another under a transport model that penalizes congestion. For WGAN-GP, we find that the congestion penalty has a spatially varying component determined by the sampling strategy used in [12] which acts like a local speed limit, making congestion cost less in some regions than others. This aspect of the congested transport problem is new, in that the congestion penalty turns out to be unbounded and depends on the distributions to be transported, and so we provide the necessary mathematical proofs for this setting. One facet of our discovery is a formula connecting the gradient of solutions to the optimization problem in WGAN-GP to the time averaged momentum of the optimal mass flow. This is in contrast to the gradient of Kantorovich potentials for the Wasserstein 1 distance, which is just the normalized direction of flow. Based on this and other considerations, we speculate on how our results explain the observed performance of WGAN-GP. Beyond applications to GANs, our theorems also point to the possibility of approximately solving large scale congested transport problems using neural network techniques. Tristan Milne, Adrian I. Nachman |
COLT | 1 |
| 2019 | Piecewise Strong Convexity of Neural NetworksabstractWe study the loss surface of a feed-forward neural network with ReLU non-linearities, regularized with weight decay. We show that the regularized loss function is piecewise strongly convex on an important open set which contains, under some conditions, all of its global minimizers. This is used to prove that local minima of the regularized loss function in this set are isolated, and that every differentiable critical point in this set is a local minimum, partially addressing an open problem given at the Conference on Learning Theory (COLT) 2015; our result is also applied to linear neural networks to show that with weight decay regularization, there are no non-zero critical points in a norm ball obtaining training error below a given threshold. We also include an experimental section where we validate our theoretical work and show that the regularized loss function is almost always piecewise strongly convex when restricted to stochastic gradient descent trajectories for three standard image classification problems. Tristan Milne |
NeurIPS | 1 |