Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tristan Milne

dblp:229/4305 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 39% Deep learning architectures and training · 36% Optimization for machine learning · 26%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network
0.612022
Wasserstein GANs with Gradient Penalty Compute Congested Transport · COLT 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization › gradient regularization
gradient penalty
0.612022
Wasserstein GANs with Gradient Penalty Compute Congested Transport · COLT 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
Wasserstein GAN
0.612022
Wasserstein GANs with Gradient Penalty Compute Congested Transport · COLT 2022
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport
0.612022
Wasserstein GANs with Gradient Penalty Compute Congested Transport · COLT 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization landscape
critical point analysis
0.412019
Piecewise Strong Convexity of Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss landscape
0.412019
Piecewise Strong Convexity of Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization
0.412019
Piecewise Strong Convexity of Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
ReLU networks
0.112019
Piecewise Strong Convexity of Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimal transport · 1.1kantorovich potential · 1.1weight decay · 0.4stochastic gradient descent · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Wasserstein GANs with Gradient Penalty Compute Congested Transport
abstract
Wasserstein GANs with Gradient Penalty (WGAN-GP) are a very popular method for training generative models to produce high quality synthetic data. While WGAN-GP were initially developed to calculate the Wasserstein 1 distance between generated and real data, recent works (e.g. [23]) have provided empirical evidence that this does not occur, and have argued that WGAN-GP perform well not in spite of this issue, but because of it. In this paper we show for the first time that WGAN-GP compute the minimum of a different optimal transport problem, the so-called congested transport [7]. Congested transport determines the cost of moving one distribution to another under a transport model that penalizes congestion. For WGAN-GP, we find that the congestion penalty has a spatially varying component determined by the sampling strategy used in [12] which acts like a local speed limit, making congestion cost less in some regions than others. This aspect of the congested transport problem is new, in that the congestion penalty turns out to be unbounded and depends on the distributions to be transported, and so we provide the necessary mathematical proofs for this setting. One facet of our discovery is a formula connecting the gradient of solutions to the optimization problem in WGAN-GP to the time averaged momentum of the optimal mass flow. This is in contrast to the gradient of Kantorovich potentials for the Wasserstein 1 distance, which is just the normalized direction of flow. Based on this and other considerations, we speculate on how our results explain the observed performance of WGAN-GP. Beyond applications to GANs, our theorems also point to the possibility of approximately solving large scale congested transport problems using neural network techniques.
Tristan Milne, Adrian I. Nachman
COLT1
2019 Piecewise Strong Convexity of Neural Networks
abstract
We study the loss surface of a feed-forward neural network with ReLU non-linearities, regularized with weight decay. We show that the regularized loss function is piecewise strongly convex on an important open set which contains, under some conditions, all of its global minimizers. This is used to prove that local minima of the regularized loss function in this set are isolated, and that every differentiable critical point in this set is a local minimum, partially addressing an open problem given at the Conference on Learning Theory (COLT) 2015; our result is also applied to linear neural networks to show that with weight decay regularization, there are no non-zero critical points in a norm ball obtaining training error below a given threshold. We also include an experimental section where we validate our theoretical work and show that the regularized loss function is almost always piecewise strongly convex when restricted to stochastic gradient descent trajectories for three standard image classification problems.
Tristan Milne
NeurIPS1