Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ece Calikus

dblp:229/6487 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-6249-4144ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 87% Time series and sequential data · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
anomaly explanation
1.012026
Reimagining Anomalies: What If Anomalies Were Normal? · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.012026
Reimagining Anomalies: What If Anomalies Were Normal? · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › anomaly detection
visual anomaly detection
0.312026
Reimagining Anomalies: What If Anomalies Were Normal? · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deep anomaly detection · 1.0counterfactual generation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Reimagining Anomalies: What If Anomalies Were Normal?
abstract
Deep learning-based methods have achieved a breakthrough in image anomaly detection, but their complexity introduces a considerable challenge to understanding why an instance is predicted to be anomalous. We introduce a novel explanation method that generates multiple alternative modifications for each anomaly, capturing diverse concepts of anomalousness. Each modification is trained to be perceived as normal by the anomaly detector. The method provides a semantic explanation of the mechanism that triggered the detector, allowing users to explore ``what-if scenarios.'' Qualitative and quantitative analyses across various image datasets demonstrate that applying this method to state-of-the-art detectors provides high-quality semantic explanations.
Philipp Liznerski, Saurabh Varshneya, Ece Calikus, Puyu Wang, Alexander Bartscher, Sebastian J. Vollmer, Sophie Fellenz, Marius Kloft
AAAI3
2022 Wisdom of the contexts: active ensemble learning for contextual anomaly detection
abstract
Abstract In contextual anomaly detection, an object is only considered anomalous within a specific context. Most existing methods use a single context based on a set of user-specified contextual features. However, identifying the right context can be very challenging in practice, especially in datasets with a large number of attributes. Furthermore, in real-world systems, there might be multiple anomalies that occur in different contexts and, therefore, require a combination of several “useful” contexts to unveil them. In this work, we propose a novel approach, called wisdom of the contexts (WisCon), to effectively detect complex contextual anomalies in situations where the true contextual and behavioral attributes are unknown. Our method constructs an ensemble of multiple contexts, with varying importance scores, based on the assumption that not all useful contexts are equally so. We estimate the importance of each context using an active learning approach with a novel query strategy. Experiments show that WisCon significantly outperforms existing baselines in different categories (i.e., active learning methods, unsupervised contextual and non-contextual anomaly detectors) on 18 datasets. Furthermore, the results support our initial hypothesis that there is no single perfect context that successfully uncovers all kinds of contextual anomalies, and leveraging the “wisdom” of multiple contexts is necessary.
Ece Calikus, Slawomir Nowaczyk, Mohamed-Rafik Bouguelia, Onur Dikmen
Data Min. Knowl. Discov.1
2020 No free lunch but a cheaper supper: A general framework for streaming anomaly detection
Ece Calikus, Slawomir Nowaczyk, Anita Pinheiro Sant'Anna, Onur Dikmen
Expert Syst. Appl.1
2018 Monitoring Equipment Operation Through Model and Event Discovery
Slawomir Nowaczyk, Anita Pinheiro Sant'Anna, Ece Calikus, Yuantao Fan
IDEAL (2)3