The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to their widespread adoption across various domains, leveraging vast pre-training knowledge and impressive generalization capabilities. However, these models often inherit biased knowledge, resulting in unfair decisions in sensitive applications. It is challenging to remove this biased knowledge without compromising reasoning abilities due to the entangled nature of the learned knowledge within LLMs. To solve this problem, existing approaches have attempted to mitigate the bias using techniques such as fine-tuning with unbiased datasets, model merging, and gradient ascent. While these methods have experimentally proven effective, they can still be sub-optimum in fully disentangling biases from reasoning. To address this gap, we propose Selective Disentanglement Unlearning (SDU), a novel unlearning framework that selectively removes biased knowledge while preserving reasoning capabilities. SDU operates in three stages: identifying biased parameters using a shadow LLM, fine-tuning with unbiased data, and performing selective parameter updates based on weight saliency. Experimental results across multiple LLMs show that SDU improves fairness accuracy by 14.7% and enhances reasoning performance by 62.6% compared to existing baselines.

The use of LLMs in natural language reasoning has shown mixed results, sometimes rivaling or even surpassing human performance in simpler classification tasks while struggling with social-cognitive reasoning, a domain where humans naturally excel. These differences have been attributed to many factors, such as variations in prompting and the specific LLMs used. However, no reasons appear conclusive, and no clear mechanisms have been established in prior work. In this study, we empirically evaluate how role-playing persona-based prompting influences Theory-of-Mind (ToM) reasoning capabilities. Grounding our research in psychological theory, we found that, beyond the inherent variance in the complexity of reasoning tasks, ToM performance differences arise because of socially-motivated prompting differences. In an era where prompt engineering with role-play is a typical approach to adapt LLMs to new contexts, our research advocates caution as models that adopt specific personas might potentially result in errors in social-cognitive reasoning.

The recent advancements in machine learning and artificial intelligence (particularly foundation models such as BERT, GPT-3, T5, ResNet, etc.) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities and driven significant revolutionary changes to the way we make inferences from complex data. These models represent a fundamental shift in the way data are approached and offer exciting new research directions and opportunities for multimodal learning and data fusion. Given the potential of foundation models to transform the field of multimodal learning, there is a need to bring together experts and researchers to discuss the latest developments in this area, exchange ideas, and identify key research questions and challenges that need to be addressed. By hosting this workshop, we aim to create a forum for researchers to share their insights and expertise on multimodal data fusion and learning using foundation models, and to explore potential new research directions and applications in the rapidly evolving field. We expect contributions from interdisciplinary researchers to study and model interactions between (but not limited to) modalities of language, graphs, time-series, vision, tabular data, sensors, and more. Our workshop will emphasize interdisciplinary work and aim at seeding cross-team collaborations around new tasks, datasets, and models.

We investigate how to effectively and efficiently embed users’ personalized travel behaviors to vectors in this paper. Based on an example scenario of travel mode choice in intelligent transportation system, three data structures representing users’ travel behaviors are defined, namely heterogeneous graph of users’ travel behaviors, user travel behavior$k$-partite graph, and personalized user travel behavior sentence set. This paper systematically analyzes the principle of existing methods and provides intuitions for the problem of learning travel behavior representation in intelligent transportation system. Then we propose the Behavior2vector, which is an improved method tailored for embedding users’ personalized travel behaviors to vectors. In our experiments, we design a travel mode choice model based on machine learning, which uses both hand-crafted basic features and embedded vector features. We further quantify the impact of various factors on travel mode choice and use travel big data to test the hypothesis of traffic assignment models, e.g., travelers always choose the path with the shortest path. In addition, we also compared with the existing graph embedding methods and essentially discussed their advantages and disadvantages.