Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hao Song 0007
dblp:23/1961-7
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-0876-485XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 57% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 24% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 19% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › few-shot learning
distribution calibration |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Distribution calibration for regression · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
multi-class calibration |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multi-class probabilities with Dirichlet calibration · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
probability calibration |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multi-class probabilities with Dirichlet calibration · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Distribution calibration for regression · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Distribution calibration for regression · ICML 2019 |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
smart home |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Releasing eHealth Analytics into the Wild: Lessons Learnt from the SPHERE Project · KDD 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sensor data analysis · 0.7machine learning deployment · 0.7temperature scaling · 0.4multi-output gaussian process · 0.4dirichlet distribution · 0.4beta link function · 0.4beta calibration · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Classifier calibration: a survey on how to assess and improve predicted class probabilitiesabstractAbstract This paper provides both an introduction to and a detailed overview of the principles and practice of classifier calibration. A well-calibrated classifier correctly quantifies the level of uncertainty or confidence associated with its instance-wise predictions. This is essential for critical applications, optimal decision making, cost-sensitive classification, and for some types of context change. Calibration research has a rich history which predates the birth of machine learning as an academic field by decades. However, a recent increase in the interest on calibration has led to new methods and the extension from binary to the multiclass setting. The space of options and issues to consider is large, and navigating it requires the right set of concepts and tools. We provide both introductory material and up-to-date technical details of the main concepts and methods, including proper scoring rules and other evaluation metrics, visualisation approaches, a comprehensive account of post-hoc calibration methods for binary and multiclass classification, and several advanced topics. Telmo de Menezes e Silva Filho, Hao Song 0007, Miquel Perelló-Nieto, Raúl Santos-Rodríguez, Meelis Kull, Peter A. Flach |
Mach. Learn. | 2 |
| 2019 | Distribution calibration for regressionabstractWe are concerned with obtaining well-calibrated output distributions from regression models. Such distributions allow us to quantify the uncertainty that the model has regarding the predicted target value. We introduce the novel concept of distribution calibration, and demonstrate its advantages over the existing definition of quantile calibration. We further propose a post-hoc approach to improving the predictions from previously trained regression models, using multi-output Gaussian Processes with a novel Beta link function. The proposed method is experimentally verified on a set of common regression models and shows improvements for both distribution-level and quantile-level calibration. Hao Song 0007, Tom Diethe, Meelis Kull, Peter A. Flach |
ICML | 1 |
| 2019 | Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multi-class probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationabstractClass probabilities predicted by most multiclass classifiers are uncalibrated, often tending towards over-confidence. With neural networks, calibration can be improved by temperature scaling, a method to learn a single corrective multiplicative factor for inputs to the last softmax layer. On non-neural models the existing methods apply binary calibration in a pairwise or one-vs-rest fashion. We propose a natively multiclass calibration method applicable to classifiers from any model class, derived from Dirichlet distributions and generalising the beta calibration method from binary classification. It is easily implemented with neural nets since it is equivalent to log-transforming the uncalibrated probabilities, followed by one linear layer and softmax. Experiments demonstrate improved probabilistic predictions according to multiple measures (confidence-ECE, classwise-ECE, log-loss, Brier score) across a wide range of datasets and classifiers. Parameters of the learned Dirichlet calibration map provide insights to the biases in the uncalibrated model. Meelis Kull, Miquel Perelló-Nieto, Markus Kängsepp, Telmo de Menezes e Silva Filho, Hao Song 0007, Peter A. Flach |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2018 | Releasing eHealth Analytics into the Wild: Lessons Learnt from the SPHERE ProjectabstractThe SPHERE project is devoted to advancing eHealth in a smart-home context, and supports full-scale sensing and data analysis to enable a generic healthcare service. We describe, from a data-science perspective, our experience of taking the system out of the laboratory into more than thirty homes in Bristol, UK. We describe the infrastructure and processes that had to be developed along the way, describe how we train and deploy Machine Learning systems in this context, and give a realistic appraisal of the state of the deployed systems. Tom Diethe, Mike Holmes, Meelis Kull, Miquel Perelló-Nieto, Kacper Sokol, Hao Song 0007, Emma Tonkin, Niall Twomey, Peter A. Flach |
KDD | 6 |
| 2016 | Subgroup Discovery with Proper Scoring Rules
Hao Song 0007, Meelis Kull, Peter A. Flach, Georgios Kalogridis |
ECML/PKDD (2) | 1 |