Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ashwin Thangali
dblp:23/2215
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 34% Video understanding and tracking · 32% 3D vision · 18% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.3 | 4 | 2012 | Learning a Family of Detectors via Multiplicative Kernels · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2011 Multiplicative kernels: Object detection, segmentation and pose estimation · CVPR 2008 Parameter Sensitive Detectors · CVPR 2007 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation |
0.2 | 2 | 2011 | Learning a Family of Detectors via Multiplicative Kernels · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2011 Multiplicative kernels: Object detection, segmentation and pose estimation · CVPR 2008 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
multi-object tracking |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Coupling detection and data association for multiple object tracking · CVPR 2012 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › action recognition
sign language recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Exploiting phonological constraints for handshape inference in ASL video · CVPR 2011 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
object segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Multiplicative kernels: Object detection, segmentation and pose estimation · CVPR 2008 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
object tracking |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Layered graphical models for tracking partially-occluded objects · CVPR 2008 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking
occlusion handling |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Layered graphical models for tracking partially-occluded objects · CVPR 2008 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
bayesian network |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Exploiting phonological constraints for handshape inference in ASL video · CVPR 2011 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › multi-object tracking
tracking-by-detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Learning a Family of Detectors via Multiplicative Kernels · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2011 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Exploiting phonological constraints for handshape inference in ASL video · CVPR 2011 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking
person tracking |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Layered graphical models for tracking partially-occluded objects · CVPR 2008 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Parameter Sensitive Detectors · CVPR 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational bayes · 0.2non-rigid image alignment · 0.2bayesian network · 0.2multiplicative kernel · 0.2lagrange dual decomposition · 0.1joint likelihood modeling · 0.1SVM learning · 0.1reversible jump markov chain monte carlo · 0.1graphical model · 0.1SVM · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Coupling detection and data association for multiple object trackingabstractWe present a novel framework for multiple object tracking in which the problems of object detection and data association are expressed by a single objective function. The framework follows the Lagrange dual decomposition strategy, taking advantage of the often complementary nature of the two subproblems. Our coupling formulation avoids the problem of error propagation from which traditional “detection-tracking approaches” to multiple object tracking suffer. We also eschew common heuristics such as “nonmaximum suppression” of hypotheses by modeling the joint image likelihood as opposed to applying independent likelihood assumptions. Our coupling algorithm is guaranteed to converge and can handle partial or even complete occlusions. Furthermore, our method does not have any severe scalability issues but can process hundreds of frames at the same time. Our experiments involve challenging, notably distinct datasets and demonstrate that our method can achieve results comparable to those of state-of-art approaches, even without a heavily trained object detector. Zheng Wu 0003, Ashwin Thangali, Stan Sclaroff, Margrit Betke |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2011 | Exploiting phonological constraints for handshape inference in ASL videoabstractHandshape is a key linguistic component of signs, and thus, handshape recognition is essential to algorithms for sign language recognition and retrieval. In this work, linguistic constraints on the relationship between start and end handshapes are leveraged to improve handshape recognition accuracy. A Bayesian network formulation is proposed for learning and exploiting these constraints, while taking into consideration inter-signer variations in the production of particular handshapes. A Variational Bayes formulation is employed for supervised learning of the model parameters. A non-rigid image alignment algorithm, which yields improved robustness to variability in handshape appearance, is proposed for computing image observation likelihoods in the model. The resulting handshape inference algorithm is evaluated using a dataset of 1500 lexical signs in American Sign Language (ASL), where each lexical sign is produced by three native ASL signers. Ashwin Thangali, Joan P. Nash, Stan Sclaroff, Carol Neidle |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2011 | Learning a Family of Detectors via Multiplicative KernelsabstractObject detection is challenging when the object class exhibits large within-class variations. In this work, we show that foreground-background classification (detection) and within-class classification of the foreground class (pose estimation) can be jointly learned in a multiplicative form of two kernel functions. Model training is accomplished via standard SVM learning. When the foreground object masks are provided in training, the detectors can also produce object segmentations. A tracking-by-detection framework to recover foreground state in video sequences is also proposed with our model. The advantages of our method are demonstrated on tasks of object detection, view angle estimation, and tracking. Our approach compares favorably to existing methods on hand and vehicle detection tasks. Quantitative tracking results are given on sequences of moving vehicles and human faces. Ashwin Thangali, Vitaly Ablavsky, Stan Sclaroff |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2008 | Layered graphical models for tracking partially-occluded objectsabstractPartial occlusions are commonplace in a variety of real world computer vision applications: surveillance, intelligent environments, assistive robotics, autonomous navigation, etc. While occlusion handling methods have been proposed, most methods tend to break down when confronted with numerous occluders in a scene. In this paper, a layered image-plane representation for tracking people through substantial occlusions is proposed. An image-plane representation of motion around an object is associated with a pre-computed graphical model, which can be instantiated efficiently during online tracking. A global state and observation space is obtained by linking transitions between layers. A reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo approach is used to infer the number of people and track them online. The method outperforms two state-of-the-art methods for tracking over extended occlusions, given videos of a parking lot with numerous vehicles and a laboratory with many desks and workstations. Vitaly Ablavsky, Ashwin Thangali, Stan Sclaroff |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2008 | Multiplicative kernels: Object detection, segmentation and pose estimationabstractObject detection is challenging when the object class exhibits large within-class variations. In this work, we show that foreground-background classification (detection) and within-class classification of the foreground class (pose estimation) can be jointly learned in a multiplicative form of two kernel functions. One kernel measures similarity for foreground-background classification. The other kernel accounts for latent factors that control within-class variation and implicitly enables feature sharing among foreground training samples. Detector training can be accomplished via standard SVM learning. The resulting detectors are tuned to specific variations in the foreground class. They also serve to evaluate hypotheses of the foreground state. When the foreground parameters are provided in training, the detectors can also produce parameter estimate. When the foreground object masks are provided in training, the detectors can also produce object segmentation. The advantages of our method over past methods are demonstrated on data sets of human hands and vehicles. Ashwin Thangali, Vitaly Ablavsky, Stan Sclaroff |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2007 | Parameter Sensitive DetectorsabstractObject detection can be challenging when the object class exhibits large variations. One commonly-used strategy is to first partition the space of possible object variations and then train separate classifiers for each portion. However, with continuous spaces the partitions tend to be arbitrary since there are no natural boundaries (for example, consider the continuous range of human body poses). In this paper, a new formulation is proposed, where the detectors themselves are associated with continuous parameters, and reside in a parameterized function space. There are two advantages of this strategy. First, a-priori partitioning of the parameter space is not needed; the detectors themselves are in a parameterized space. Second, the underlying parameters for object variations can be learned from training data in an unsupervised manner. In profile face detection experiments, at a fixed false alarm number of 90, our method attains a detection rate of 75% vs. 70% for the method of Viola-Jones. In hand shape detection, at a false positive rate of 0.1%, our method achieves a detection rate of 99.5% vs. 98% for partition based methods. In pedestrian detection, our method reduces the miss detection rate by a factor of three at a false positive rate of 1%, compared with the method of Dalal-Triggs. Ashwin Thangali, Vitaly Ablavsky, Stan Sclaroff |
CVPR | 2 |