Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Antonius J. Hendriks

dblp:23/2866 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 52% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 48%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
reactive planning
0.031994
Planning by Adaptation: Experimental Results · ICRA 1994
Planning for reactive robot behavior · ICRA 1992
Achieving robustness by casting planning as adaptation of a reactive system · ICRA 1991
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › behavior-based control
reactive behavior
0.041995
Exploiting Patterns of Interaction to Achieve Reactive Behavior · Artif. Intell. 1995
Planning by Adaptation: Experimental Results · ICRA 1994
Planning for reactive robot behavior · ICRA 1992
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.031994
Planning by Adaptation: Experimental Results · ICRA 1994
Planning for reactive robot behavior · ICRA 1992
Achieving robustness by casting planning as adaptation of a reactive system · ICRA 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reactive system adaptation · 0.0formal modeling · 0.0agent architecture · 0.0experimental evaluation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 Exploiting Patterns of Interaction to Achieve Reactive Behavior
Damian M. Lyons, Antonius J. Hendriks
Artif. Intell.2
1994 Planning by Adaptation: Experimental Results
abstract
A robot system operating in an environment in which there is uncertainty and change needs to combine the ability to react with the ability to plan ahead. In a previous paper we proposed a solution to the problems of integrating planning and reaction: cast planning as adaptation of a reactive system, the planner-reactor approach. In this paper, we present our first experimental results from this approach. The results indicate that the planner-reactor approach is an attractive option for integrating planning and reaction in a robot system, allowing smooth, online updates to the behavior, of a reactive system with little time and behavior penalties accruing from the use of a planner.>
Damian M. Lyons, Antonius J. Hendriks
ICRA2
1994 Using perception to plan incremental adaptations
abstract
A robot system operating in an environment in which there is uncertainty and change needs to combine the ability to react with the ability to plan ahead. In a previous paper we proposed a solution to the problems of integrating planning and reaction: cast planning as adaptation of a reactive system. The planner, asynchronously tuning the reactor, decides on the appropriate parts of the reactor to be modified based on perceptions: information gathered in the reactor for the express purpose to inform the planner. In this paper, we show the benefits of using perception to adapt the reactor where it needs to be updated most and present our first experimental results from the planner-reactor architecture.>
Antonius J. Hendriks, Damian M. Lyons
IROS1
1993 Stable grasping with a multi-fingered robot hand: a behavior-based approach
abstract
The paper describes the software design approach and implementation of a stable grasp strategy to control a multifingered robot hand in a dynamic and uncertain environment. The overall design starts with a reactive system, called the Grasp Reactor, which measures the environment, and produces actions based on the environmental situations present. To improve the robustness of the Grasp Reactor, it is augmented with a deliberative component which executes concurrently with the Grasp Reactor. This component, called the Grasp Advisor, communicates global constraints to the Grasp Reactor to improve its decision making capability.
Thomas G. Murphy, Damian M. Lyons, Antonius J. Hendriks
IROS3
1992 Planning for reactive robot behavior
abstract
A robot system operating in an environment in which there is uncertainty and change needs to combine the ability to react with the ability to plan ahead. The authors had previously proposed a solution to the problems of integrating planning and reaction: cast planning as adaptation of a reactive system. They extend the theoretical treatment of the planner, including the effect of its iterated adaptation on the reactor, and describe the current implementation environment and a working example.>
Damian M. Lyons, Antonius J. Hendriks
ICRA2
1991 Achieving robustness by casting planning as adaptation of a reactive system
abstract
Classical artificial intelligence planning is not sufficiently robust in uncertain and dynamic environments. Reactive approaches are robust in some environments-namely those for which they have been programmed. An approach that integrates a priori planning with reaction to increase robustness is presented. As motivation, a practical robot problem, the kitting robot, is presented. Solving this problem demands a system that can make timely and robust actions in an uncertain environment. A solution to the kitting robot problem in which planning is cast as adaptation of a reactive system to suit changes in the goals or environment is outlined. The reactive system (the reactor) is based on a formal model for representing flexible robot plans, the RS model. Thus, it was possible to formalize the mechanisms by which the planner improves the behavior of the reactor. This system was implemented to control a Puma-560 robot equipped with visual sensing.>
Damian M. Lyons, Antonius J. Hendriks, Sandeep Mehta
ICRA2
1991 A methodology for creating and adapting reactive systems
abstract
A methodology is presented for building integrated planning-reacting systems. The work is based on a formal process-based approach to building the reactive component; this makes it possible to formalize the concept of a planner improving a reactor. The planner design emphasizes how the planner can use the reactor to focus its reasoning, as well as how the reactor is guided by the planner to improve its behavior. The reactive component (the reactor) is based on a process-based model of robot computation, the RS model. This gives a powerful representation for actions with precise formal semantics. The duty of the planning component (the planner) is to adapt the reactor to suit a set of objectives and the possibilities afforded by the environment. Planner and reactor both operate continually, separately and in a complementary fashion.>
Antonius J. Hendriks, Damian M. Lyons
ICTAI1