Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christof Zalka

dblp:23/2984 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational complexity · 70% Quantum computing and quantum information · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity
communication complexity
0.011999
Bounds for Small-Error and Zero-Error Quantum Algorithms · FOCS 1999
Computational complexity › communication complexity › two-party communication
quantum communication complexity
0.011999
Bounds for Small-Error and Zero-Error Quantum Algorithms · FOCS 1999
Computational complexity › query complexity
quantum query complexity
0.011999
Bounds for Small-Error and Zero-Error Quantum Algorithms · FOCS 1999
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms
quantum search
0.011999
Bounds for Small-Error and Zero-Error Quantum Algorithms · FOCS 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

monotone function query complexity · 0.0evasiveness conjecture · 0.0amplification · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 Bounds for Small-Error and Zero-Error Quantum Algorithms
abstract
We present a number of results related to quantum algorithms with small error probability and quantum algorithms that are zero-error. First, we give a tight analysis of the trade-offs between the number of queries of quantum search algorithms, their error probability, the size of the search space, and the number of solutions in this space. Using this, we deduce new lower and upper bounds for quantum versions of amplification problems. Next, we establish nearly optimal quantum-classical separations for the query complexity of monotone functions in the zero-error model (where our quantum zero-error model is defined so as to be robust when the quantum gates are noisy). Also, we present a communication complexity problem related to a total function for which there is a quantum-classical communication complexity gap in the zero-error model. Finally, we prove separations for monotone graph properties in the zero-error and other error models which imply that the evasiveness conjecture for such properties does not hold for quantum computers.
Harry Buhrman, Richard Cleve, Ronald de Wolf, Christof Zalka
FOCS4