Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Jarmo Ilonen

dblp:23/304 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot manipulation · 55% 3D vision · 24% Image recognition and object detection · 10%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 50% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 50%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction
0.212013
Fusing visual and tactile sensing for 3-D object reconstruction while grasping · ICRA 2013
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping
0.212013
Fusing visual and tactile sensing for 3-D object reconstruction while grasping · ICRA 2013
Robotics › Robot manipulation › tactile sensing › force/tactile sensing › multimodal tactile sensing
visual-tactile fusion
0.212013
Fusing visual and tactile sensing for 3-D object reconstruction while grasping · ICRA 2013
Image and video processing
feature detection
0.112008
Image Feature Localization by Multiple Hypothesis Testing of Gabor Features · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2008
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
object recognition
0.112008
Image Feature Localization by Multiple Hypothesis Testing of Gabor Features · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2008
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object localization
0.112007
Object Localisation Using Generative Probability Model for Spatial Constellation and Local Image Features · ICCV 2007
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
probabilistic generative model
0.112007
Object Localisation Using Generative Probability Model for Spatial Constellation and Local Image Features · ICCV 2007
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping
grasp planning
0.012013
Fusing visual and tactile sensing for 3-D object reconstruction while grasping · ICRA 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tactile sensing · 0.2state estimation · 0.2extended kalman filter · 0.2multiple hypothesis testing · 0.1gabor features · 0.1markov chain monte carlo · 0.1RANSAC · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Comparison of bubble detectors and size distribution estimators
abstract
Detection, counting and characterization of bubbles, that is, transparent objects in a liquid, is important in many industrial applications. These applications include monitoring of pulp delignification and multiphase dispersion processes common in the chemical, pharmaceutical, and food industries. Typically the aim is to measure the bubble size distribution. In this paper, we present a comprehensive comparison of bubble detection methods for challenging industrial image data. Moreover, we compare the detection-based methods to a direct bubble size distribution estimation method that does not require the detection of individual bubbles. The experiments showed that the approach based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) outperforms the other methods in detection accuracy. However, the boosting-based approaches were remarkably faster to compute. The power spectrum approach for direct bubble size distribution estimation produced accurate distributions and it is fast to compute, but it does not provide the spatial locations of the bubbles. Selecting the most suitable method depends on the specific application.
Jarmo Ilonen, Roman Juránek, Tuomas Eerola, Lasse Lensu, Markéta Dubská, Pavel Zemcík, Heikki Kälviäinen
Pattern Recognit. Lett.1
2014 Estimation of Bubble Size Distribution Based on Power Spectrum
Jarmo Ilonen, Tuomas Eerola, Heikki Mutikainen, Lasse Lensu, Jari Käyhkö, Heikki Kälviäinen
CIARP1
2013 Fusing visual and tactile sensing for 3-D object reconstruction while grasping
abstract
In this work, we propose to reconstruct a complete 3-D model of an unknown object by fusion of visual and tactile information while the object is grasped. Assuming the object is symmetric, a first hypothesis of its complete 3-D shape is generated from a single view. This initial model is used to plan a grasp on the object which is then executed with a robotic manipulator equipped with tactile sensors. Given the detected contacts between the fingers and the object, the full object model including the symmetry parameters can be refined. This refined model will then allow the planning of more complex manipulation tasks. The main contribution of this work is an optimal estimation approach for the fusion of visual and tactile data applying the constraint of object symmetry. The fusion is formulated as a state estimation problem and solved with an iterative extended Kalman filter. The approach is validated experimentally using both artificial and real data from two different robotic platforms.
Jarmo Ilonen, Jeannette Bohg, Ville Kyrki
ICRA1
2010 Learning and Detection of Object Landmarks in Canonical Object Space
abstract
This work contributes to part-based object detection and recognition by introducing an enhanced method for local part detection. The method is based on complex-valued multiresolution Gabor features and their ranking using multiple hypothesis testing. In the present work, our main contribution is the introduction of a canonical object space, where objects are represented in their ``expected pose and visual appearance''. The canonical space circumvents the problem of geometric image normalisation prior to feature extraction. In addition, we define a compact set of Gabor filter parameters, from where the optimal values can be easily devised. These enhancements make our method an attractive landmark detector for part-based object detection and recognition methods.
Joni-Kristian Kämäräinen, Jarmo Ilonen
ICPR2
2008 Image Feature Localization by Multiple Hypothesis Testing of Gabor Features
abstract
Several novel and particularly successful object and object category detection and recognition methods based on image features, local descriptions of object appearance, have recently been proposed. The methods are based on a localization of image features and a spatial constellation search over the localized features. The accuracy and reliability of the methods depend on the success of both tasks: image feature localization and spatial constellation model search. In this paper, we present an improved algorithm for image feature localization. The method is based on complex-valued multi resolution Gabor features and their ranking using multiple hypothesis testing. The algorithm provides very accurate local image features over arbitrary scale and rotation. We discuss in detail issues such as selection of filter parameters, confidence measure, and the magnitude versus complex representation, and show on a large test sample how these influence the performance. The versatility and accuracy of the method is demonstrated on two profoundly different challenging problems (faces and license plates).
Jarmo Ilonen, Joni-Kristian Kämäräinen, Pekka Paalanen, Miroslav Hamouz, Josef Kittler, Heikki Kälviäinen
IEEE Trans. Image Process.1
2007 Object Localisation Using Generative Probability Model for Spatial Constellation and Local Image Features
abstract
In this paper we apply state-of-the-art approach to object detection and localisation by incorporating local descriptors and their spatial configuration into a generative probability model. In contrast to the recent semi- supervised methods we do not utilise interest point detectors, but apply a supervised approach where local image features (landmarks) are annotated in a training set and therefore their appearance and spatial variation can be learnt. Our method enables working in purely probabilistic search spaces providing a MAP estimate of object location, and in contrast to the recent methods, no background class needs to be formed. Using the training set we can estimate pdfs for both spatial constellation and local feature appearance. By applying an inference bias that the largest pdf mode has probability one, we are able to combine prior information (spatial configuration of the features) and observations (image feature appearance) into posterior distribution which can be generatively sampled, e.g. using MCMC techniques. The MCMC methods are sensitive to initialisation, but as a solution, we also propose a very efficient and accurate RANSAC-based method for finding good initial hypotheses of object poses. The complete method can robustly and accurately detect and localise objects under any homography.
Joni-Kristian Kämäräinen, Miroslav Hamouz, Josef Kittler, Pekka Paalanen, Jarmo Ilonen, Alexander Drobchenko
ICCV5
2006 Object categorization using self-organization over visual appearance
abstract
We propose an object categorization method which utilizes a feature structure, capturing object visual appearance, and the self-organizing map (SOM). The feature structure combines a set of spatially distant local receptive field responses with a constellation model which represents spatial relationships between the responses. The receptive field responses capture local appearance information and the spatial model generates a complete description of an object. The combination allows accurate representation of objects and their deformations. By the self-organization procedure unsupervised categorization over visual appearance of objects can be constructed. In addition, the proposed feature structure provides a reconstruction property, and thus, categorization can be used to visualize modalities of visual appearance. Categorization of real objects is demonstrated with human face images.
Jarmo Ilonen, Joni-Kristian Kämäräinen
IJCNN1
2006 Feature representation and discrimination based on Gaussian mixture model probability densities - Practices and algorithms
Pekka Paalanen, Joni-Kristian Kämäräinen, Jarmo Ilonen, Heikki Kälviäinen
Pattern Recognit.3
2003 Differential Evolution Training Algorithm for Feed Forward Neural Networks
Jarmo Ilonen, Joni-Kristian Kämäräinen, Jouni Lampinen
Neural Process. Lett.1
2003 Improving similarity measures of histograms using smoothing projections
Joni-Kristian Kämäräinen, Ville Kyrki, Jarmo Ilonen, Heikki Kälviäinen
Pattern Recognit. Lett.3