Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David John Gagne II

dblp:23/309 · also David John Gagne · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-0469-2740ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 82% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 18%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Environmental and earth informatics · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-AI interaction
trust in AI
0.312025
(Re)Conceptualizing trustworthy AI: A foundation for change · Artif. Intell. 2025
Environmental and earth informatics
weather forecasting
0.212015
Day-Ahead Hail Prediction Integrating Machine Learning with Storm-Scale Numerical Weather Models · AAAI 2015
Data mining
probabilistic graphical models
0.112008
Spatiotemporal Relational Probability Trees: An Introduction · ICDM 2008
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › decision tree learning
probability estimation trees
0.112008
Spatiotemporal Relational Probability Trees: An Introduction · ICDM 2008
Data mining › structured data mining
relational data mining
0.112008
Spatiotemporal Relational Probability Trees: An Introduction · ICDM 2008
Data mining
spatiotemporal data mining
0.112008
Spatiotemporal Relational Probability Trees: An Introduction · ICDM 2008
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning
0.112015
Day-Ahead Hail Prediction Integrating Machine Learning with Storm-Scale Numerical Weather Models · AAAI 2015
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
gradient boosting
0.112015
Day-Ahead Hail Prediction Integrating Machine Learning with Storm-Scale Numerical Weather Models · AAAI 2015
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning › tree ensembles
random forest
0.112015
Day-Ahead Hail Prediction Integrating Machine Learning with Storm-Scale Numerical Weather Models · AAAI 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spatial neighborhood ensemble probability · 0.4random forest · 0.4linear regression · 0.4gradient boosting trees · 0.4sampling · 0.1probability estimation trees · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 (Re)Conceptualizing trustworthy AI: A foundation for change
abstract
Developers and academics have grown increasingly interested in developing “trustworthy” artificial intelligence (AI). However, this aim is difficult to achieve in practice, especially given trust and trustworthiness are complex, multifaceted concepts that cannot be completely guaranteed nor built entirely into an AI system. We have drawn on the breadth of trust-related literature across multiple disciplines and fields to synthesize knowledge pertaining to interpersonal trust, trust in automation, and risk and trust. Based on this review we have (re)conceptualized trustworthiness in practice as being both (a) perceptual, meaning that a user assesses whether, when, and to what extent AI model output is trustworthy, even if it has been developed in adherence to AI trustworthiness standards, and (b) context-dependent, meaning that a user's perceived trustworthiness and use of an AI model can vary based on the specifics of their situation (e.g., time-pressures for decision-making, high-stakes decisions). We provide our reconceptualization to nuance how trustworthiness is thought about, studied, and evaluated by the AI community in ways that are more aligned with past theoretical research.
Christopher D. Wirz, Julie Demuth, Ann Bostrom, Mariana Cains, Imme Ebert-Uphoff, David John Gagne II, Andrea Schumacher, Amy McGovern, Deianna Madlambayan
Artif. Intell.6
2015 Day-Ahead Hail Prediction Integrating Machine Learning with Storm-Scale Numerical Weather Models
abstract
Hail causes billions of dollars in losses by damaging buildings, vehicles, and crops. Improving the spatial and temporal accuracy of hail forecasts would allow people to mitigate hail damage. We have developed an approach to forecasting hail that identifies potential hail storms in storm-scale numerical weather prediction models and matches them with observed hailstorms. Machine learning models, including random forests, gradient boosting trees, and linear regression, are used to predict the expected hail size from each forecast storm. The individual hail size forecasts are merged with a spatial neighborhood ensemble probability technique to produce a consensus probability of hail at least 25.4 mm in diameter. The system was evaluated during the 2014 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Hazardous Weather Testbed Experimental Forecast Program and compared with a physics-based hail size model. The machine-learning-based technique shows advantages in producing smaller size errors and more reliable probability forecasts. The machine learning approaches correctly predicted the location and extent of a significant hail event in eastern Nebraska and a marginal severe hail event in Colorado.
David John Gagne II, Amy McGovern, Jerald Brotzge, Michael Coniglio, James Correia Jr., Ming Xue
AAAI1
2014 Enhancing understanding and improving prediction of severe weather through spatiotemporal relational learning
abstract
Severe weather, including tornadoes, thunderstorms, wind, and hail annually cause significant loss of life and property. We are developing spatiotemporal machine learning techniques that will enable meteorologists to improve the prediction of these events by improving their understanding of the fundamental causes of the phenomena and by building skillful empirical predictive models. In this paper, we present significant enhancements of our Spatiotemporal Relational Probability Trees that enable autonomous discovery of spatiotemporal relationships as well as learning with arbitrary shapes. We focus our evaluation on two real-world case studies using our technique: predicting tornadoes in Oklahoma and predicting aircraft turbulence in the United States. We also discuss how to evaluate success for a machine learning algorithm in the severe weather domain, which will enable new methods such as ours to transfer from research to operations, provide a set of lessons learned for embedded machine learning applications, and discuss how to field our technique.
Amy McGovern, David John Gagne II, John K. Williams, Rodger A. Brown, Jeffrey B. Basara
Mach. Learn.2
2008 Spatiotemporal Relational Probability Trees: An Introduction
abstract
We introduce spatiotemporal relational probability trees (SRPTs), probability estimation trees for relational data that can vary in both space and time. The SRPT algorithm addresses the exponential increase in search complexity through sampling. We validate the SRPT using a simulated data set and we empirically demonstrate the SRPT algorithm on two real-world data sets.
Amy McGovern, Nathan C. Hiers, Matthew W. Collier, David John Gagne II, Rodger A. Brown
ICDM4