Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Karen Seyffarth

dblp:23/4597 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Computer networks · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Distributed computing theory · 70% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed computing theory
distributed graph algorithms
0.012002
Dynamic and self-stabilizing distributed matching · PODC 2002
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
matching
0.012002
Dynamic and self-stabilizing distributed matching · PODC 2002
Distributed computing theory
self-stabilization
0.012002
Dynamic and self-stabilizing distributed matching · PODC 2002
Distributed computing theory › distributed algorithms
anonymous networks
0.012002
Dynamic and self-stabilizing distributed matching · PODC 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-stabilizing algorithm · 0.0read/write atomicity · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Dynamic and self-stabilizing distributed matching
abstract
Finding a maximal or maximum matching in a graph is a well-understood problem for which efficient sequential algorithms exist. Applications of matchings in distributed settings make it desirable to find self-stabilizing asynchronous distributed solutions to these problems. We first present a self-stabilizing algorithm for finding a maximal matching in a general anonymous network under read/write atomicity with linear round complexity. This is followed by a self-stabilizing algorithm, with quadratic time complexity, for finding a maximum matching in a bipartite network under composite atomicity. These results represent significant progress in the area of distributed algorithms for matchings.
Subhendu Chattopadhyay, Lisa Higham, Karen Seyffarth
PODC3
1998 Constructions of large planar networks with given degree and diameter
abstract
There is considerable interest in constructing large networks with given diameter and maximum degree. In certain applications, there is a natural restriction for the networks to be planar. Thus, consider the problem of determining the maximum number of nodes in a planar network with maximum degree Δ and diameter at most k. We have previously proved that this number is at most (roughly) 12kΔ⌊k/2⌋ and there is a trivial lower bound of about (Δ − 1)⌊k/2⌋. We introduce a number of general constructions which substantially improve the lower bound and yield the largest known networks. We also provide a catalog of the best-known networks for small values of Δ and k, many obtained by specialized constructions. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Networks 32:275–281, 1998
Michael R. Fellows, Pavol Hell, Karen Seyffarth
Networks3
1995 Large Planar Graphs with Given Diameter and Maximum Degree
Michael R. Fellows, Pavol Hell, Karen Seyffarth
Discret. Appl. Math.3