Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Steve Mock

dblp:23/5456 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems
grid computing
0.012002
QMView and GAMESS: integration into the world wide computational grid · SC 2002
Distributed systems › grid computing
grid workflow
0.012002
QMView and GAMESS: integration into the world wide computational grid · SC 2002
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Incorporation of middleware and grid technologies to enhance usability in Computational Chemistry applications
Jerry P. Greenberg, Steve Mock, Karan Bhatia, Mason J. Katz, Greg Bruno, Federico D. Sacerdoti, Philip M. Papadopoulos, Kim K. Baldridge
Future Gener. Comput. Syst.2
2004 Kepler: An Extensible System for Design and Execution of Scientific Workflows
abstract
Most scientists conduct analyses and run models in several different software and hardware environments, mentally coordinating the export and import of data from one environment to another. The Kepler scientific workflow system provides domain scientists with an easy-to-use yet powerful system for capturing scientific workflows (SWFs). SWFs are a formalization of the ad-hoc process that a scientist may go through to get from raw data to publishable results. Kepler attempts to streamline the workflow creation and execution process so that scientists can design, execute, monitor, re-run, and communicate analytical procedures repeatedly with minimal effort. Kepler is unique in that it seamlessly combines high-level workflow design with execution and runtime interaction, access to local and remote data, and local and remote service invocation. SWFs are superficially similar to business process workflows but have several challenges not present in the business workflow scenario. For example, they often operate on large, complex and heterogeneous data, can be computationally intensive and produce complex derived data products that may be archived for use in reparameterized runs or other workflows. Moreover, unlike business workflows, SWFs are often dataflow-oriented as witnessed by a number of recent academic systems (e.g., DiscoveryNet, Taverna and Triana) and commercial systems (Scitegic/Pipeline-Pilot, Inforsense). In a sense, SWFs are often closer to signal-processing and data streaming applications than they are to control-oriented business workflow applications.
Ilkay Altintas, Chad Berkley, Efrat Jaeger, Matthew B. Jones, Bertram Ludäscher, Steve Mock
SSDBM6
2002 QMView and GAMESS: integration into the world wide computational grid
abstract
High performance computing, storage, visualization, and database infrastructures are increasing geometrically in complexity as scientists move towards grid-based computing. While this is natural, it has the effect of pushing computational capabilities beyond the reach of scientists because of the time needed to harness the infrastructure. Hiding the complexity of networked resources becomes essential if scientists are to utilize them effectively. In this work, we describe our efforts to integrate various computational chemistry components into a scientific computing environment. We briefly describe improvements we have made to individual components of the chemistry environment as well as future directions, followed by a more in-depth discussion of our strategy for integration into a grid workflow environment based on web services, which enables access to remote resources while shielding users from the complexities of the grid infrastructures. A preliminary schema for storing data obtained from computational chemistry calculations is also described.
Kim K. Baldridge, Jerry P. Greenberg, Stephen T. Elbert, Steve Mock, Philip M. Papadopoulos
SC4