Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xiao-Mei Chou

dblp:23/5988 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 87% Debugging and program repair · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
software reliability
0.011989
Does Imperfect Debugging Affect Software Reliability Growth? · ICSE 1989
Software testing › software reliability › software reliability modeling
software reliability growth model
0.011989
Does Imperfect Debugging Affect Software Reliability Growth? · ICSE 1989
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1989 Does Imperfect Debugging Affect Software Reliability Growth?
abstract
This paper discusses the improvement of conventional software reliability growth models by elimination of the unreasonable assumption that errors or faults in a program can be perfectly removed when they are detected.The results show that exponential-type software reliability growth models that deal with errorcounting data could be used even if the perfect debugging assumption were not held, in which case the interpretation of the model parameters should be changed.An analysis of real project data is presented. I. INTRODUCTlON
Mitsuru Ohba, Xiao-Mei Chou
ICSE2