Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Keith Instone

dblp:23/6035 · also Keith E. Instone · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 5Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Usability and user experience research › usability evaluation
comparative usability study
0.011992
Hypertext or Book: Which is Better for Answering Questions? · CHI 1992
Information retrieval › document organization
hypertext
0.011992
Hypertext or Book: Which is Better for Answering Questions? · CHI 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

comparative study · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Effective Illustrations in Interactive Media: What Works?
Barbee Teasley, Keith Instone, Laura M. Leventhal
INTERACT2
1996 Assessing user interfaces for diverse user groups: Evaluation strategies and defining characteristics
abstract
User interface designers are challenged to design for diverse users, including those of different genders, cultures and abilities; however, little research has been directed at this problem. One factor which may inhibit such research is its cost. This paper presents an approach which offers a way to seek out important characteristics of designs in a cost-effective way and reports on the results. In a study reported here, subjects from different nationalities and of both genders evaluated three dialog boxes specifically designed for 'white American women'. 'European adult male intellectuals', and 'English-speaking-internationals'. The dialog boxes were evaluated with conjoint techniques of preference rankings, and factor-analysed adjective ratings. These results showed that female subjects had stronger and more consistent patterns of preferences than the male subjects. All subjects preferred interfaces rated high on an accessibility factor and disliked complex layouts; this effect was even stronger for women. Nationality did not effect ratings. Gender had a stronger effect on the outcome than nationality.
Laura M. Leventhal, Barbee Teasley, Brad Blumenthal, Keith Instone, Daryl Stone, M. V. Donskoy
Behav. Inf. Technol.4
1995 Searching without a keyboard in a multimedia environment
Laura M. Leventhal, Barbee Teasley, Keith Instone, Daryl Stone
INTERACT3
1993 Sleuthing in HyperHolmes : aTM an evaluation of using hypertext vs. a book to answer questions
abstract
Although hypertext offers exciting new ways of presenting and accessing information, there is little research which systematically compares the usability of hypertext against traditional media with an eye to improving the design of the hypertext. This paper presents the results of an experiment which examined the performance and navigation strategies of users engaged in a question-answering task using either a hypertext encyclopedia of Sherlock Holmes facts (the HyperHolmessyTMstem) or the traditional paper form. The results showed that, overall, the hypertext users were marginally more accurate in answering questions, and excelled at questions where the key information was embedded in a text entry. The book users were marginally faster overall, but excelled only in answering questions based on graphics. Hypertext users showed a preference for those tools which most closely mimicked use of a conventional book. They used a hierarchical structure to guide their navigation strategy in early trials, but soon learned to navigate in a non-hierarchical, flat way.
Laura M. Leventhal, Barbee Teasley, Keith Instone, Diane S. Rohlman, John Farhat
Behav. Inf. Technol.3
1992 Hypertext or Book: Which is Better for Answering Questions?
Barbee T. Mynatt, Laura M. Leventhal, Keith Instone, John Farhat, Diane S. Rohlman
CHI3
1992 Another view of computer science ethics: Patterns of responses among computer scientists
Laura M. Leventhal, Keith Instone, David W. Chilson
J. Syst. Softw.2